Allison Marier1, Lauren E W Olsho2, William Rhodes2, William D Spector3. 1. Abt Associates, U.S. Health Division, Bethesda, MD, USA Allison_Marier@abtassoc.com. 2. Abt Associates, U.S. Health Division, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3. Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Falls are physically and financially costly, but may be preventable with targeted intervention. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is one potential source of information on fall risk factors among nursing home residents, but its limited breadth and relatively infrequent updates may limit its practical utility. Richer, more frequently updated data from electronic medical records (EMRs) may improve ability to identify individuals at highest risk for falls. METHODS: The authors applied a repeated events survival model to analyze MDS 3.0 and EMR data for 5129 residents in 13 nursing homes within a single large California chain that uses a centralized EMR system from a leading vendor. Estimated regression parameters were used to project resident fall probability. The authors examined the proportion of observed falls within each projected fall risk decile to assess improvements in predictive power from including EMR data. RESULTS: In a model incorporating fall risk factors from the MDS only, 28.6% of observed falls occurred among residents in the highest projected risk decile. In an alternative specification incorporating more frequently updated measures for the same risk factors from the EMR data, 32.3% of observed falls occurred among residents in the highest projected risk decile, a 13% increase over the base MDS-only specification. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating EMR data improves ability to identify those at highest risk for falls relative to prediction using MDS data alone. These improvements stem chiefly from the greater frequency with which EMR data are updated, with minimal additional gains from availability of additional risk factor variables.
OBJECTIVE: Falls are physically and financially costly, but may be preventable with targeted intervention. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is one potential source of information on fall risk factors among nursing home residents, but its limited breadth and relatively infrequent updates may limit its practical utility. Richer, more frequently updated data from electronic medical records (EMRs) may improve ability to identify individuals at highest risk for falls. METHODS: The authors applied a repeated events survival model to analyze MDS 3.0 and EMR data for 5129 residents in 13 nursing homes within a single large California chain that uses a centralized EMR system from a leading vendor. Estimated regression parameters were used to project resident fall probability. The authors examined the proportion of observed falls within each projected fall risk decile to assess improvements in predictive power from including EMR data. RESULTS: In a model incorporating fall risk factors from the MDS only, 28.6% of observed falls occurred among residents in the highest projected risk decile. In an alternative specification incorporating more frequently updated measures for the same risk factors from the EMR data, 32.3% of observed falls occurred among residents in the highest projected risk decile, a 13% increase over the base MDS-only specification. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating EMR data improves ability to identify those at highest risk for falls relative to prediction using MDS data alone. These improvements stem chiefly from the greater frequency with which EMR data are updated, with minimal additional gains from availability of additional risk factor variables.
Authors: Dustin D French; Dennis C Werner; Robert R Campbell; Gail M Powell-Cope; Audrey L Nelson; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Tatjana Bulat; Andrea M Spehar Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2006-10-27 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Mary E Tinetti; Ling Han; David S H Lee; Gail J McAvay; Peter Peduzzi; Cary P Gross; Bingqing Zhou; Haiqun Lin Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Alon Y Avidan; Brant E Fries; Mary L James; Kristina L Szafara; Glenn T Wright; Ronald D Chervin Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: William Spector; Thomas Shaffer; D E B Potter; Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo; M Rhona Limcangco Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Richard D Boyce; Olga V Kravchenko; Subashan Perera; Jordan F Karp; Sandra L Kane-Gill; Charles F Reynolds; Steven M Albert; Steven M Handler Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 7.942
Authors: Pritika Dasgupta; Jessie VanSwearingen; Alan Godfrey; Mark Redfern; Manuel Montero-Odasso; Ervin Sejdic Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.802