Literature DB >> 26102191

The role of tactile afference in shaping motor behaviour and implications for prosthetic innovation.

Rochelle Ackerley1, Anne Kavounoudias2.   

Abstract

The present review focusses on how tactile somatosensory afference is encoded and processed, and how this information is interpreted and acted upon in terms of motor control. We relate the fundamental workings of the sensorimotor system to the rehabilitation of amputees using modern prosthetic interventions. Our sense of touch is central to our everyday lives, from allowing us to manipulate objects accurately to giving us a sense of self-embodiment. There are a variety of specialised cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents, which differ in terms of type and density according to the skin site. In humans, there is a dense innervation of our hands, which is reflected in their vast over-representation in somatosensory and motor cortical areas. We review the accumulated evidence from animal and human studies about the precise interplay between the somatosensory and motor systems, which is highly integrated in many brain areas and often not separable. The glabrous hand skin provides exquisite, discriminative detail about touch, which is useful for refining movements. When these signals are disrupted, such as through injury or amputation, the consequences are considerable. The development of sensory feedback in prosthetics offers a promising avenue for the full integration of a missing body part. Real-time touch feedback from motor intentions aids in grip control and the ability to distinguish different surfaces, even introducing the possibility of pleasure in artificial touch. Thus, our knowledge from fundamental research into sensorimotor interactions should be used to develop more realistic and integrative prostheses.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efferent; M1; Rehabilitation; S1; Somatosensory; Touch

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26102191     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  20 in total

Review 1.  Advantages of comparative studies in songbirds to understand the neural basis of sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  Karagh Murphy; Logan S James; Jon T Sakata; Jonathan F Prather
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Motor Intention/Intentionality and Associationism - A conceptual review.

Authors:  Denis Ebbesen; Jeppe Olsen
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2018-12

3.  The importance of cutaneous feedback on neural activation during maximal voluntary contraction.

Authors:  Carlos Cruz-Montecinos; Huub Maas; Carla Pellegrin-Friedmann; Claudio Tapia
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  The biology of skin wetness perception and its implications in manual function and for reproducing complex somatosensory signals in neuroprosthetics.

Authors:  Davide Filingeri; Rochelle Ackerley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Relationships between sensory integration and the core symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the mediating effect of executive function.

Authors:  Jing Li; Wenchen Wang; Jia Cheng; Haimei Li; Lei Feng; Yuanchun Ren; Lu Liu; Qiujin Qian; Yufeng Wang
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Armband with Soft Robotic Actuators and Vibrotactile Stimulators for Bimodal Haptic Feedback from a Dexterous Artificial Hand.

Authors:  Moaed A Abd; Michael Bornstein; Emmanuelle Tognoli; Erik D Engeberg
Journal:  IEEE ASME Int Conf Adv Intell Mechatron       Date:  2018-09-03

Review 7.  Human Thalamic Somatosensory Nucleus (Ventral Caudal, Vc) as a Locus for Stimulation by INPUTS from Tactile, Noxious and Thermal Sensors on an Active Prosthesis.

Authors:  Jui Hong Chien; Anna Korzeniewska; Luana Colloca; Claudia Campbell; Patrick Dougherty; Frederick Lenz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Somatosensory lateral inhibition processes modulate motor response inhibition - an EEG source localization study.

Authors:  Julia Friedrich; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Natural Sensations Evoked in Distal Extremities Using Surface Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Julia P Slopsema; John M Boss; Lane A Heyboer; Carson M Tobias; Brooke P Draggoo; Kathleen E Finn; Payton J Hoff; Katharine H Polasek
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2018-01-29

10.  Sensory Feedback in Hand Prostheses: A Prospective Study of Everyday Use.

Authors:  Ulrika Wijk; Ingela K Carlsson; Christian Antfolk; Anders Björkman; Birgitta Rosén
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.