Weisan Zhang1, Shuo Chen1, Xifeng Dong1, Ping Lei1. 1. 1 Department of Geriatrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China ; 2 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medicine Center (UMC), Tianjin 300121, China ; 3 Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China ; 4 Department of Hematology-Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall diagnostic yield and accuracy of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB)-based targeted biopsies in detecting peripheral lesions. METHODS: A systematic search in PubMed was performed using "electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy" crossed with "peripheral lesions" and "lung nodules". Test performance characteristics with the use of forest plots, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROCs) and bivariate random effects were summarized using Meta-Disc software. Adverse events and complications were recorded if reported. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies (1,106 patients with peripheral lung lesions) were included in this analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLRs), negative likelihood ratios (NLRs), and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) of ENB was 82%, 100%, 19.36, 0.23, and 97.62, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for the SROC was 0.9786. No procedure-related complication was found. CONCLUSIONS: ENB is an effective and safe procedure in diagnosing peripheral lung lesions.
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall diagnostic yield and accuracy of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB)-based targeted biopsies in detecting peripheral lesions. METHODS: A systematic search in PubMed was performed using "electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy" crossed with "peripheral lesions" and "lung nodules". Test performance characteristics with the use of forest plots, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROCs) and bivariate random effects were summarized using Meta-Disc software. Adverse events and complications were recorded if reported. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies (1,106 patients with peripheral lung lesions) were included in this analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLRs), negative likelihood ratios (NLRs), and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) of ENB was 82%, 100%, 19.36, 0.23, and 97.62, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for the SROC was 0.9786. No procedure-related complication was found. CONCLUSIONS: ENB is an effective and safe procedure in diagnosing peripheral lung lesions.
Authors: Afina S Glas; Jeroen G Lijmer; Martin H Prins; Gouke J Bonsel; Patrick M M Bossuyt Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Ralf Eberhardt; Devanand Anantham; Armin Ernst; David Feller-Kopman; Felix Herth Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-03-22 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Gregorino Paone; Emanuele Nicastri; Gabriele Lucantoni; Raffaele Dello Iacono; Paolo Battistoni; Anna Lisa D'Angeli; Giovanni Galluccio Journal: Chest Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Sanjay Gupta; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Lyle D Broemeling; Frank A Morello; Michael J Wallace; Kamran Ahrar; David C Madoff; Ravi Murthy; Marshall E Hicks Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lonny B Yarmus; Christopher Mallow; Nicholas Pastis; Jeffrey Thiboutot; Hans Lee; David Feller-Kopman; Andrew D Lerner; Nicole Tanner; Gerard Silvestri; Alexander Chen Journal: Respiration Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 3.580
Authors: Lonny Yarmus; Jason Akulian; Momen Wahidi; Alex Chen; Jennifer P Steltz; Sam L Solomon; Diana Yu; Fabien Maldonado; Jose Cardenas-Garcia; Daniela Molena; Hans Lee; Anil Vachani Journal: Chest Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Susan K Garwood; Pam ClenDening; Nathanael D Hevelone; Kristin L Hood; Sean Pidgeon; Leonard James Wudel Journal: Lung Cancer Manag Date: 2016-11-29