| Literature DB >> 26101533 |
A Ri Byun1, Hyejin Chun2, Jin Lee1, Sang Wha Lee1, Hong Soo Lee1, Kyung Won Shim1.
Abstract
Objective. Barley sprout (Hordeum vulgare L.) contains 4.97% fat, 52.6% polysaccharide, and 34.1% protein along with a variety of vitamins, minerals, and polyphenolic compounds. Hexacosanol is one such compound from the barley leaf that might improve cholesterol metabolism by decreasing cholesterol synthesis. Method. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of barley sprout extract on serum lipid metabolism in healthy volunteers (n = 51). Subjects were randomly divided into two groups: one group consumed a single capsule of barley leaf extract daily (n = 25, 42.48 ± 13.58 years) and the other consumed placebo capsules (n = 26, 40.54 ± 11.1 years) for 12 weeks. Results. After 12 weeks, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein- (LDL-) cholesterol were not lower in the barley sprout extract group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.415 and p = 0.351, resp.) and no differences in clinical or laboratory findings were observed between both groups. Conclusion. Our study failed to show significant lipid-lowering effects of barley sprout extract, possibly due to dosage, duration of therapy, and small sample size. Despite our nonsignificant findings, barley sprout has a possibility as a functional health food; therefore future research is needed.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26101533 PMCID: PMC4458530 DOI: 10.1155/2015/473056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Flow sheet of the subjects selection.
Baseline characteristics of all participants.
| Study group ( | Placebo group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 42.48 ± 13.58 | 40.54 ± 11.10 | 0.578 |
| Height, cm | 161.56 ± 5.40 | 163.15 ± 5.69 | 0.311 |
| Weight, kg | 58.52 ± 6.16 | 61.19 ± 10.09 | 0.261 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 22.51 ± 2.20 | 22.89 ± 2.98 | 0.605 |
| WC, cm | 76.36 ± 8.17 | 77.50 ± 8.38 | 0.625 |
| SBP, mmHg | 114.48 ± 11.87 | 111.28 ± 11.50 | 0.331 |
| DBP, mmHg | 69.72 ± 9.94 | 66.58 ± 10.07 | 0.267 |
| Pulse, beats/min | 74.44 ± 8.79 | 77.12 ± 10.37 | 0.326 |
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 87.88 ± 8.64 | 88.12 ± 7.95 | 0.920 |
| Plasma insulin, uIU/dL | 6.23 ± 4.07 | 5.89 ± 2.43 | 0.718 |
| HbA1c, % | 5.74 ± 0.36 | 5.61 ± 0.49 | 0.293 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 86.84 ± 42.87 | 81.96 ± 40.95 | 0.890 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 182.16 ± 31.89 | 183.31 ± 26.70 | 0.692 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 111.16 ± 26.83 | 115.12 ± 27.23 | 0.951 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 57.56 ± 12.86 | 57.77 ± 11.17 | 0.604 |
| AST, U/L | 16.80 ± 10.57 | 14.27 ± 5.09 | 0.201 |
| ALT, U/L | 21.28 ± 12.38 | 18.00 ± 3.53 | 0.278 |
| BUN, mg/dL | 12.08 ± 4.25 | 11.98 ± 4.49 | 0.933 |
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.81 ± 0.09 | 0.79 ± 0.10 | 0.344 |
| Computed tomography | |||
| Total fat, cm2 | 272.60 ± 84.48 | 277.18 ± 93.86 | 0.856 |
| Visceral fat, cm2 | 77.83 ± 37.96 | 80.83 ± 41.56 | 0.789 |
| Subcutaneous fat, cm2 | 194.76 ± 64.23 | 196.37 ± 68.30 | 0.931 |
| Body composition analysis | |||
| Fat, % | 31.06 ± 5.96 | 29.62 ± 5.93 | 0.392 |
| Fat, kg | 18.30 ± 4.54 | 18.41 ± 6.19 | 0.942 |
| Lean body mass, kg | 21.68 ± 2.55 | 23.22 ± 3.65 | 0.088 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
p values were calculated with Student's t-test for continuous variables.
BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen.
Figure 2Comparisons of the differences between initial and after 12 weeks according to the groups. Delta (Δ) means differences between initial and after 12 weeks. Δ fasting glucose, mg/dL; Δ insulin, uU/dL; Δ HbA1c, %; Δ TG, mg/dL; Δ cholesterol, mg/dL; Δ LDL, mg/dL; Δ HDL mg/dL. TG, triglyceride; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein. p values were calculated by Student's t-test for continuous variable.
Changes between baseline and 12-week measurements.
| Test group ( | Placebo group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 1.12 ± 6.67 | 1.50 ± 5.95 | 0.832 |
| Plasma insulin, | 0.30 ± 5.91 | −0.04 ± 2.12 | 0.788 |
| HbA1c, % | −0.24 ± 0.27 | 0 ± 0.23 | 0.737 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 24.88 ± 92.15 | −4.16 ± 27.54 | 0.131 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 0 ± 20.21 | 4.46 ± 18.54 | 0.415 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | −3.20 ± 20.99 | 1.85 ± 17.16 | 0.351 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | −1.72 ± 8.34 | 0 ± 7.58 | 0.444 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
p values were calculated with Student's t-test for continuous variables.
LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein.
Treatment tolerability in the two groups.
| Total ( | Test group ( | Placebo group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stopped medication, | 15 (22.73%) | 10 (28.57%) | 5 (16.13%) | 0.169 |
| Reasons for stopping, | ||||
| Itching sense | 7 (10.61%) | 4 (11.43%) | 3 (9.68%) | 0.153 |
| Personal circumstances | 8 (12.12%) | 6 (17.14%) | 2 (6.45%) |
Itching sense resolved spontaneously in several days.
p values were calculated with Student's t-test for categorical variables.
(a) Test group (n = 25)
| Baseline | After 12 weeks |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 87.88 ± 8.64 | 89.00 ± 8.38 | 0.416 |
| Plasma insulin, | 6.23 ± 4.07 | 6.52 ± 4.62 | 0.804 |
| HbA1c, % | 5.74 ± 0.36 | 5.72 ± 0.37 | 0.662 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 86.84 ± 42.87 | 111.52 ± 114.27 | 0.190 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 182.16 ± 31.89 | 182.16 ± 33.19 | 1.000 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 111.16 ± 26.83 | 107.96 ± 30.21 | 0.453 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 57.56 ± 12.86 | 55.84 ± 12.67 | 0.313 |
(b) Placebo group (n = 26)
| Baseline | After 12 weeks |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 88.12 ± 7.95 | 89.61 ± 6.24 | 0.210 |
| Plasma insulin, | 5.89 ± 2.43 | 5.85 ± 1.97 | 0.927 |
| HbA1c, % | 5.61 ± 0.49 | 5.61 ± 0.42 | 1.000 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 81.96 ± 40.95 | 77.81 ± 45.09 | 0.449 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 183.31 ± 26.70 | 187.77 ± 28.20 | 0.231 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 115.12 ± 27.23 | 116.96 ± 30.05 | 0.588 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 57.77 ± 11.17 | 57.77 ± 9.99 | 1.000 |
Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations.
p values were calculated with paired t-test for continuous variables.
LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein.