Literature DB >> 26100

A survey study of the use of electropupillogram in predicting response to psychostimulants.

V Bhatara, L E Arnold, W Knopp, D J Smeltzer.   

Abstract

To confirm the conclusions from a previous study supporting the usefullness of electropupillogram (E.P.G.) in predicting clinical response, data from three separate studies with hyperkinetic and learning disabled (L.D.) children treated with stimulants were surveyed. Change in extent of pupillary contraction (E.C.) after a test dose of stimulant as measured by E.P.G. did not correlate significantly with actual clinical rating change (with one exception out of 14 correlations calculated). These negative results are reported with a reservation regarding their validity because of technical difficulties in data collection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 26100     DOI: 10.1007/BF00426885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  7 in total

1.  Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli.

Authors:  E H HESS; J M POLT
Journal:  Science       Date:  1960-08-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving.

Authors:  E H Hess; J M Polt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-03-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Predicting amphetamine response in hyperkinetic children by electronic pupillography.

Authors:  W Knopp; L E Arnold; R L Andras; D J Smeltzer
Journal:  Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol       Date:  1973-05

4.  Electrodermal correlates of hyperactivity in children.

Authors:  J H Satterfield; M E Dawson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Predicting the response of children with learning disabilities and behavior problems to dextroamphetamine sulfate. The clinical interview and the finger twitch test.

Authors:  A Barcai
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Levoamphetamine vs dextroamphetamine in minimal brain dysfunction. Replication, time response, and differential effect by diagnostic group and family rating.

Authors:  L E Arnold; R D Huestis; D J Smeltzer; J Scheib; D Wemmer; G Colner
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1976-03

7.  Methylphenidate vs dextroamphetamine vs caffeine in minimal brain dysfunction: controlled comparison by placebo washout design with Bayes' analysis.

Authors:  L E Arnold; J Christopher; R Huestis; D J Smeltzer
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1978-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.