Literature DB >> 769721

Levoamphetamine vs dextroamphetamine in minimal brain dysfunction. Replication, time response, and differential effect by diagnostic group and family rating.

L E Arnold, R D Huestis, D J Smeltzer, J Scheib, D Wemmer, G Colner.   

Abstract

Double-blind crossover randomized Latin square comparison of placebo, dextroamphetamine, and levoamphetamine in 31 consecutively diagnosed children with minimal brain dysfunction (MBD) replicated a smaller nonrandom study. Both isomers showed significantly more benefit than placebo but were not significantly different from each other. Dextroamphetamine showed a nonsignificant trend of superiority over levoamphetamine. Of 25 subjects who responded well to drugs, three responded only to levoamphetamine, five only to dextroamphetamine, and 17 to both. This study seems to confirm the efficacy of levoamphetamine in MBD. An unsocialized aggressive subgroup (308.4) showed a nonsignificant trend for levoamphetamine superiority, in contrast to the hyperkinetic (308.0) and overanxious (308.2) subgroups. Those who responded best to levoamphetamine tended (not significantly) to be from poorer functioning families. Parents' ratings, but not teachers' or psychiatrists' ratings, showed significant placebo effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 769721     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770030012002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  12 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutics of aggression in children.

Authors:  D S Pine; E Cohen
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic variability of long-acting stimulants in the treatment of children and adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  James C Ermer; Ben A Adeyi; Michael L Pucci
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Differential effects of amphetamine isomers on dopamine release in the rat striatum and nucleus accumbens core.

Authors:  Paul E A Glaser; Theresa C Thomas; B Matthew Joyce; F Xavier Castellanos; Greg A Gerhardt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  A survey study of the use of electropupillogram in predicting response to psychostimulants.

Authors:  V Bhatara; L E Arnold; W Knopp; D J Smeltzer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-04-28       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: safety considerations.

Authors:  Mark L Wolraich; Laura McGuinn; Melissa Doffing
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Efficacy and safety of drugs for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah C O S Padilha; Suzane Virtuoso; Fernanda S Tonin; Helena H L Borba; Roberto Pontarolo
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Adderall produces increased striatal dopamine release and a prolonged time course compared to amphetamine isomers.

Authors:  B Matthew Joyce; Paul E A Glaser; Greg A Gerhardt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  J S Markowitz; K S Patrick
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Pemoline pharmacokinetics and long term therapy in children with attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity.

Authors:  C P Collier; S J Soldin; J M Swanson; S M MacLeod; F Weinberg; J G Rochefort
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Comparative effects of d-amphetamine, l-amphetamine, and methylphenidate on mood in man.

Authors:  R C Smith; J M Davis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-06-06       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.