Literature DB >> 365123

Methylphenidate vs dextroamphetamine vs caffeine in minimal brain dysfunction: controlled comparison by placebo washout design with Bayes' analysis.

L E Arnold, J Christopher, R Huestis, D J Smeltzer.   

Abstract

Double-blind crossover comparison of methylphenidate hydrochloride, dextroamphetamine sulfate, and caffeine after placebo washout in 29 children with minimal brain dysfunction (MBD) showed on six ratings that methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine were significantly (P less than .05 to P less than .001) better than placebo and caffeine, but not significantly (P less than .05) different from each other. Placebo, caffeine, and ratings before drug did not differ significantly. Of 26 drug responders, 12 responded best to dextroamphetamine, ten to methylphenidate, and one to caffeine. The latter child showed no improvement at all with either prescription stimulant. Methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine were each efficacious for six children who did not respond to the other stimulant. All three drugs showed significant (P less than .05) weight loss and cardiovascular side effects, the latter possibly spurious. Dextroamphetamine showed a significant (P less than .05) decrease from placebo in "tummyaches."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 365123     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770280073008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  19 in total

1.  Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (vyvanse), a prodrug stimulant for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  David W Goodman
Journal:  P T       Date:  2010-05

2.  D2 dopamine receptor subtype-mediated hyperactivity and amphetamine responses in a model of ADHD.

Authors:  Xueliang Fan; Ming Xu; Ellen J Hess
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.996

3.  Clinical gains from including both dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate in stimulant trials.

Authors:  Bjørn E Ramtvedt; Elisabeth Røinås; Henning S Aabech; Kjetil S Sundet
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.576

4.  A survey study of the use of electropupillogram in predicting response to psychostimulants.

Authors:  V Bhatara; L E Arnold; W Knopp; D J Smeltzer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-04-28       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Minimizing adverse events while maintaining clinical improvement in a pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder crossover trial with dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate.

Authors:  Bjørn E Ramtvedt; Henning S Aabech; Kjetil Sundet
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 6.  Use of drugs in child psychiatry.

Authors:  P Sitholey
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Mouse model of hyperkinesis implicates SNAP-25 in behavioral regulation.

Authors:  E J Hess; K A Collins; M C Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Pemoline pharmacokinetics and long term therapy in children with attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity.

Authors:  C P Collier; S J Soldin; J M Swanson; S M MacLeod; F Weinberg; J G Rochefort
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Comparing the efficacy of stimulants for ADHD in children and adolescents using meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephen V Faraone; Jan Buitelaar
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 4.785

10.  Caffeine and human behavior: arousal, anxiety, and performance effects.

Authors:  D A Sawyer; H L Julia; A C Turin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1982-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.