Literature DB >> 32418136

Likelihood of achieving a 50%, 60%, or 70% estimated live birth rate threshold with 1 or 2 cycles of planned oocyte cryopreservation.

Bat-Sheva L Maslow1, Michael M Guarnaccia2, Leslie Ramirez2, Joshua U Klein2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the likelihood of cryopreserving enough oocytes for 50%, 60%, or 70% estimated live birth rate (eLBR) with 1-2 planned oocyte cryopreservation (Pl-OC) cycles.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing all patients completing ≥ 1 Pl-OC cycle from 2016 to 2018 at a large single-center OC program. Subjects were categorized by age at retrieval and number of cycles. We extrapolated age-based oocyte thresholds for 50%, 60%, or 70% eLBR from previously published data. We calculated the proportion of subjects overall, and for each age group, whose number of frozen oocytes was greater than or equal to their age-based threshold for a 50%, 60%, or 70% eLBR after 1 and 2 cycles. OR for 60% eLBR with one cycle was calculated for age and AMH cutoff values and corroborated with logistic regression.
RESULTS: A total of 1241 subjects, completing 1799 Pl-OC cycles, were included. With one cycle, 66% (819/1241) achieved ≥ 50% eLBR and 51% (634/1241) achieved 70% eLBR. With two cycles, 79.6% (988/1241) attained ≥ 50% eLBR and 65.5% (813/1241) achieved 70% eLBR. Achieving 50%, 60%, or 70% eLBR with 1-2 cycles was significantly associated with both age (p < 0.001) and AMH (p < 0.001). Age < 37.5 and AMH > 1.995 were independently associated with attaining 60% eLBR with one cycle (age: OR 13.73; 95%CI 9.16-20.57, p < 0.001; AMH: OR 7.32; 95% CI 5.50-9.76, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Younger age and higher AMH were associated with achieving 50%, 60%, or 70% eLBR thresholds with Pl-OC. Nevertheless, almost all subjects were successfully able to preserve enough oocytes for ≥ 50% eLBR in 1-2 cycles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fertility preservation; Live birth rate; Oocyte cryopreservation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32418136      PMCID: PMC7376799          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01791-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  16 in total

Review 1.  Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: an Ethics Committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Baby budgeting: oocyte cryopreservation in women delaying reproduction can reduce cost per live birth.

Authors:  Kate Devine; Sunni L Mumford; Kara N Goldman; Brooke Hodes-Wertz; Sarah Druckenmiller; Anthony M Propst; Nicole Noyes
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.

Authors:  R H Goldman; C Racowsky; L V Farland; S Munné; L Ribustello; J H Fox
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Optimal timing for elective egg freezing.

Authors:  Tolga B Mesen; Jennifer E Mersereau; Jennifer B Kane; Anne Z Steiner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Expanding reproductive lifespan: a cost-effectiveness study on oocyte freezing.

Authors:  L L van Loendersloot; L M Moolenaar; B W J Mol; S Repping; F van der Veen; M Goddijn
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Cumulative live birth rates and number of oocytes retrieved in women of advanced age. A single centre analysis including 4500 women ≥38 years old.

Authors:  Marta Devesa; Rosa Tur; Ignacio Rodríguez; Buenaventura Coroleu; Francisca Martínez; Nikolaos P Polyzos
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Counseling patients on reproductive aging and elective fertility preservation-a survey of obstetricians and gynecologists' experience, approach, and knowledge.

Authors:  Rani Fritz; Susan Klugman; Harry Lieman; Jay Schulkin; Laura Taouk; Neko Castleberry; Erkan Buyuk
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.

Authors:  Joseph O Doyle; Kevin S Richter; Joshua Lim; Robert J Stillman; James R Graham; Michael J Tucker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Women's experience of social egg freezing: perceptions of success, risks, and 'going it alone'.

Authors:  Kylie Baldwin; Lorraine Culley
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.767

10.  Elective egg freezing and its underlying socio-demography: a binational analysis with global implications.

Authors:  M C Inhorn; D Birenbaum-Carmeli; J Birger; L M Westphal; J Doyle; N Gleicher; D Meirow; M Dirnfeld; D Seidman; A Kahane; P Patrizio
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.982

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Zachary Walker; Andrea Lanes; Elizabeth Ginsburg
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.211

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.