Literature DB >> 26099209

Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part II: Background to a research strategy.

P Bragge1, L Piccenna1, J Middleton2, S Williams3, G Creasey4, S Dunlop5, D Brown6, R Gruen7,8.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Literature review/semi-structured interviews.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a spinal cord injury (SCI) research strategy for Australia and New Zealand.
SETTING: Australia.
METHODS: The National Trauma Research Institute Forum approach of structured evidence review and stakeholder consultation was employed. This involved gathering from published literature and stakeholder consultation the information necessary to properly consider the challenge, and synthesising this into a briefing document.
RESULTS: A research strategy 'roadmap' was developed to define the major steps and key planning questions to consider; next, evidence from published SCI research strategy initiatives was synthesised with information from four one-on-one semi-structured interviews with key SCI research stakeholders to create a research strategy framework, articulating six key themes and associated activities for consideration. These resources, combined with a review of SCI prioritisation literature, were used to generate a list of draft principles for discussion in a structured stakeholder dialogue meeting.
CONCLUSION: The research strategy roadmap and framework informed discussion at a structured stakeholder dialogue meeting of 23 participants representing key SCI research constituencies, results of which are published in a companion paper. These resources could also be of value in other research strategy or planning exercises. SPONSORSHIP: This project was funded by the Victorian Transport Accident Commission and the Australian and New Zealand Spinal Cord Injury Network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26099209     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  31 in total

1.  Using the Spinal Cord Injury Common Data Elements.

Authors:  Fin Biering-Sørensen; Susan Charlifue; Michael J Devivo; Stacie T Grinnon; Naomi Kleitman; Yun Lu; Joanne Odenkirchen
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012

2.  Use of research to inform public policymaking.

Authors:  John N Lavis; Francisco Becerra Posada; Andy Haines; Eric Osei
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Oct 30-Nov 5       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures.

Authors:  J D Steeves; D Lammertse; A Curt; J W Fawcett; M H Tuszynski; J F Ditunno; P H Ellaway; M G Fehlings; J D Guest; N Kleitman; P F Bartlett; A R Blight; V Dietz; B H Dobkin; R Grossman; D Short; M Nakamura; W P Coleman; M Gaviria; A Privat
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 4.  Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial design.

Authors:  D Lammertse; M H Tuszynski; J D Steeves; A Curt; J W Fawcett; C Rask; J F Ditunno; M G Fehlings; J D Guest; P H Ellaway; N Kleitman; A R Blight; B H Dobkin; R Grossman; H Katoh; A Privat; M Kalichman
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 5.  Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?

Authors:  I T Coyne
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  The problem of rigor in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.824

Review 7.  Progress in spinal cord research - a refined strategy for the International Spinal Research Trust.

Authors:  M S Ramer; G P Harper; E J Bradbury
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Acceptable benefits and risks associated with surgically improving arm function in individuals living with cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  K D Anderson; J Fridén; R L Lieber
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Minimum information about a spinal cord injury experiment: a proposed reporting standard for spinal cord injury experiments.

Authors:  Vance P Lemmon; Adam R Ferguson; Phillip G Popovich; Xiao-Ming Xu; Diane M Snow; Michihiro Igarashi; Christine E Beattie; John L Bixby
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking?

Authors:  John N Lavis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  9 in total

1.  It is a marathon rather than a sprint: an initial exploration of unmet needs and support preferences of caregivers of children with SCI.

Authors:  Susan L Ryerson Espino; Erin H Kelly; Anne Rivelli; Kathy Zebracki; Lawrence C Vogel
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part III: outcomes.

Authors:  J W Middleton; L Piccenna; R Lindsay Gruen; S Williams; G Creasey; S Dunlop; D Brown; P E Batchelor; D J Berlowitz; S Coates; J A Dunn; J B Furness; M P Galea; T Geraghty; B K Kwon; S Urquhart; D Yates; P Bragge
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Targeting Enolase in Reducing Secondary Damage in Acute Spinal Cord Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Azizul Haque; Mollie Capone; Denise Matzelle; April Cox; Naren L Banik
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Advancing primary and community care for persons with spinal cord injury: Key findings from a Canadian summit.

Authors:  James Milligan; Joseph Lee; Matt Smith; Lindsay Donaldson; Peter Athanasopoulos; Kent Bassett-Spiers; Jeremy Howcroft; Jennifer W Howcroft; Tara Jeji; Phalgun B Joshi; Upender Mehan; Vanessa Noonan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 5.  Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part I: rapid review of SCI prioritisation literature.

Authors:  P Bragge; L Piccenna; J W Middleton; S Williams; G Creasey; S Dunlop; D Brown; R L Gruen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 6.  Neuron specific enolase: a promising therapeutic target in acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Azizul Haque; Swapan K Ray; April Cox; Naren L Banik
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.584

Review 7.  What do we know about evidence-informed priority setting processes to set population-level health-research agendas: an overview of reviews.

Authors:  Audrey Tan; Sumanth Kumbagere Nagraj; Mona Nasser; Tarang Sharma; Tanja Kuchenmüller
Journal:  Bull Natl Res Cent       Date:  2022-01-06

8.  Facilitators and Barriers to International Collaboration in Spinal Cord Injury: Results from a Survey of Clinicians and Researchers.

Authors:  Vanessa K Noonan; Elaine Chan; Kent Bassett-Spiers; David J Berlowitz; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Susan Charlifue; Marnie Graco; Keith C Hayes; Jane Horsewell; Phalgun Joshi; Debora Markelis; Verna Smith; Zeina Waheed; Douglas J Brown
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Spinal cord stimulation for the restoration of bladder function after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Casey J Steadman; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2020-06-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.