| Literature DB >> 26098844 |
Na Liu1, Z Lewis Liu2, Guoshu Gong1, Min Zhang1, Xu Wang3, You Zhou1, Xiaobo Qi1, Huabao Chen1, Jizhi Yang1, Peigao Luo1, Chunping Yang1.
Abstract
Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, which causes wheat powdery mildew, is an obligate biotrophic pathogen that can easily genetically adapt to its host plant. Understanding the virulence structure of and genetic variations in this pathogen is essential for disease control and for breeding resistance to wheat powdery mildew. This study investigated 17 pathogenic populations in Sichuan, China and classified 109 isolates into two distinct groups based on pathogenicity analysis: high virulence (HV, 92 isolates) and low virulence (LV, 17 isolates). Populations from Yibin (Southern region), Xichang (Western region), and Meishan (Middle region) showed lower virulence frequencies than populations from other regions. Many of the previously known resistance genes did not confer resistance in this study. The resistance gene Pm21 displayed an immune response to pathogenic challenge with all populations in Sichuan, and Pm13, Pm5b, Pm2+6, and PmXBD maintained resistance. AMOVA revealed significantly higher levels of variation within populations and lower levels of variation among populations within regions. High levels of gene flow were detected among populations in the four regions. Closely related populations within each region were distinguished by cluster analyses using ISSR and SRAP alleles. Both ISSR and SRAP allele profiling analyses revealed high levels of genetic diversity among pathogenic populations in Sichuan. Although ISSR and SRAP profiling analysis showed similar resolutions, the SRAP alleles appeared to be more informative. We did not detect any significant association between these alleles and the virulence or pathogenicity of the pathogen. Our results suggest that ISSR and SRAP alleles are more efficient for the characterization of small or closely related populations versus distantly related populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26098844 PMCID: PMC4476801 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Frequency of virulence of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici in Sichuan, China.
| No. | Cultivar | Isogene | Number of virulent isolates | Frequency of virulence (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Funo |
| 109 | 100 |
| 2 | Chancellor |
| 109 | 100 |
| 3 | XX186 |
| 99 | 90 |
| 4 | Asosan /8cc |
| 96 | 88 |
| 5 | Coker 747 |
| 96 | 88 |
| 6 | Timgalen |
| 95 | 87 |
| 7 | Axminster/8cc |
| 94 | 86 |
| 8 | Chul /8cc |
| 93 | 85 |
| 9 | Hope /8cc |
| 88 | 80 |
| 10 | Kolibri |
| 83 | 76 |
| 11 | CI14189 |
| 80 | 73 |
| 12 | Armada |
| 80 | 73 |
| 13 | W150 |
| 78 | 71 |
| 14 | Khapli /8a |
| 76 | 69 |
| 15 | Mish Amber/8cc |
| 75 | 68 |
| 16 | Normandie |
| 68 | 62 |
| 17 | Baimian 3 |
| 66 | 60 |
| 18 | Sonora/8cc |
| 65 | 59 |
| 19 | Amigo |
| 61 | 55 |
| 20 | Mission |
| 59 | 54 |
| 21 | Kavkaz |
| 54 | 49 |
| 22 | Maris Dove |
| 42 | 38 |
| 23 | Ulka /8cc |
| 36 | 33 |
| 24 | Coker 983 |
| 36 | 33 |
| 25 | Era |
| 31 | 28 |
| 26 | Xiaobaidong |
| 21 | 19 |
| 27 | Maris Huntsman |
| 20 | 18 |
| 28 | Aquila |
| 18 | 16 |
| 29 | R4A |
| 13 | 11 |
| 30 | Yangmai5/Sub.6v |
| 0 | 0 |
Primers used for SRAP and ISSR analysis in this study.
| Assay | ID | Sequence (5’-3’) |
|---|---|---|
| SRAP | Me1F |
|
| Me2F |
| |
| Me3F |
| |
| Me4F |
| |
| Me5F |
| |
| Me6F |
| |
| Me7F |
| |
| Me8F |
| |
| Em1R |
| |
| Em2R |
| |
| Em3R |
| |
| Em4R |
| |
| Em5R |
| |
| Em6R |
| |
| Em7R |
| |
| Em8R |
| |
| ISSR | 808 |
|
| 807 |
| |
| 812 |
| |
| 841 |
| |
| 891 |
| |
| 887 |
| |
| 890 |
| |
| 888 |
| |
| 884 |
| |
| 835 |
|
B = C, G, or T; D = A, G, or T; H = A, C, or T; V = A, C, or G.
Fig 1Virulence distribution of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici in Sichuan, China.
The occurrence frequency of the corresponding genes for virulence in Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici in Sichuan, China.
| Regions | Number of genes | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Luzhou (LZ) | 24 | 80 |
| Zigong (ZG) | 22~24 | 76 |
| Deyang (DY) | 20~22 | 70 |
| Leshan (LS) | 16~23 | 65 |
| Neijiang (NJ) | 17~22 | 65 |
| Mianyang (MY) | 14~24 | 64 |
| Dazhou (DZ) | 17~22 | 64 |
| Ziyang (ZY) | 11~24 | 64 |
| Suining (SN) | 15~24 | 63 |
| Chengdu (CD) | 13~26 | 62 |
| Guang’an (GA) | 16~20 | 61 |
| Ya'an (YA) | 11~22 | 60 |
| Renshou (RS) | 4~22 | 60 |
| Guangyuan (GY) | 8~23 | 59 |
| Meishan (MS) | 6~24 | 51 |
| Xichang (XC) | 11~20 | 47 |
| Yibin (YB) | 6~19 | 43 |
a Number of detected genes for virulence of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici.
Fig 2UPGMA dendrogram of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici strains based on the virulence data.
Fig 3Representative molecular marker profile.
(A): ISSR profiles in the tested 21 strains of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici with primer 807. (B): SRAP profiles in the tested 21 strains of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici with primer Me2/Em8.
PCR amplification of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici isolates using ISSR and SRAP primers.
| Assay | Primer | Amplified bands | Polymorphic bands | Percentage of polymorphic bands (%) | PIC | RP | Average RP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISSR | 808 | 19 | 15 | 78.95 | 0.36 | 10.37 | 0.55 |
| 807 | 19 | 14 | 73.68 | 0.35 | 10.71 | 0.56 | |
| 812 | 20 | 13 | 65.00 | 0.33 | 10.35 | 0.52 | |
| 841 | 16 | 11 | 68.75 | 0.32 | 7.39 | 0.46 | |
| 891 | 15 | 11 | 73.33 | 0.35 | 7.98 | 0.53 | |
| 887 | 21 | 15 | 71.43 | 0.33 | 10.25 | 0.49 | |
| 890 | 14 | 11 | 78.57 | 0.41 | 9.54 | 0.68 | |
| 888 | 21 | 15 | 71.43 | 0.34 | 10.19 | 0.49 | |
| 884 | 21 | 14 | 66.67 | 0.33 | 10.52 | 0.50 | |
| 835 | 20 | 16 | 80.00 | 0.35 | 10.31 | 0.52 | |
| Average | 18.6 | 13.5 | 72.78 | 0.35 | 9.76 | 0.53 | |
| SRAP | Me6/Em8 | 16 | 13 | 81.25 | 0.33 | 7.31 | 0.46 |
| Me8/Em8 | 16 | 11 | 68.75 | 0.33 | 8.04 | 0.50 | |
| Me5/Em5 | 12 | 5 | 41.67 | 0.24 | 3.62 | 0.30 | |
| Me1/Em1 | 16 | 13 | 81.25 | 0.35 | 8.50 | 0.53 | |
| Me8/Em6 | 12 | 9 | 75.00 | 0.32 | 5.54 | 0.46 | |
| Me2/Em8 | 15 | 10 | 66.67 | 0.35 | 7.83 | 0.52 | |
| Me8/Em4 | 15 | 12 | 80.00 | 0.36 | 8.14 | 0.54 | |
| Me4/Em8 | 19 | 13 | 68.42 | 0.29 | 7.77 | 0.41 | |
| Me5/Em8 | 19 | 12 | 63.16 | 0.29 | 7.44 | 0.39 | |
| Me3/Em8 | 14 | 9 | 64.29 | 0.29 | 5.75 | 0.41 | |
| Average | 15.4 | 10.7 | 64.29 | 0.32 | 6.99 | 0.45 |
PIC, polymorphic information content; RP, resolving power.
Fig 4UPGMA dendrogram of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici strains based on the ISSR data showing relationships among strains isolated from the Middle region (A), Northeastern region (B), Southern region (C), Western region (D); Regional relationships (E) are also shown.
Fig 5UPGMA dendrogram of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici strains based on the SRAP data showing relationships among strains isolated from the Middle region (A), Northeastern region (B), Southern region (C), Western region (D); Regional relationships (E) are also shown.
Parameters related to the genetic diversity and gene flow of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici in Sichuan, China.
| Regions | ISSR | SRAP | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Middle (M) | 1.984 | 1.621 | 0.352 | 0.520 | 2.148 | 1.955 | 1.480 | 0.291 | 0.445 | 1.851 |
| West (W) | 1.930 | 1.558 | 0.325 | 0.485 | 2.880 | 1.948 | 1.508 | 0.306 | 0.465 | 3.991 |
| Northeast (NE) | 1.909 | 1.532 | 0.313 | 0.470 | 1.526 | 1.890 | 1.496 | 0.295 | 0.446 | 1.686 |
| South (S) | 1.823 | 1.525 | 0.306 | 0.454 | 0.448 | 1.812 | 1.455 | 0.274 | 0.415 | 0.401 |
| Average | 1.911 | 1.559 | 0.324 | 0.482 | — | 1.901 | 1.485 | 0.291 | 0.443 | — |
| Among regions | — | — | — | — | 7.984 | — | — | — | — | 8.126 |
Na, observed number of alleles; Ne, effective number of alleles [Kimura and Crow (1964)]; H, Nei’s (1973) gene diversity; I, Shannon’s information index [Lewontin (1972)]; Nm, gene flow. Mean values of Na, Ne, H, I are presented in this table.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on ISSR and SRAP data.
| Source of variation | df | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage variation | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISSR | Among regions | 3 | 157.383 | 0.233 | 0.72% | <0.0001 |
| Among populations within regions | 13 | 514.523 | 1.742 | 5.34% | <0.0001 | |
| Within populations | 88 | 2694.037 | 30.614 | 93.94% | <0.0001 | |
| Total | 104 | 3365.943 | 32.589 | |||
| SRAP | Among regions | 3 | 121.472 | 0.431 | 1.74% | <0.0001 |
| Among populations within regions | 13 | 352.876 | 0.695 | 2.82% | <0.0001 | |
| Within populations | 88 | 2073.766 | 23.566 | 95.44% | <0.0001 | |
| Total | 104 | 2548.114 | 24.691 |