| Literature DB >> 30235252 |
Asma Akbar1, Shaukat Hussain2, Kaleem Ullah2, Muhammad Fahim2, Gul Shad Ali1.
Abstract
In addition to the well-known Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici, several other Fusarium species are known to cause extensive worldwide crop losses in tomatoes. Prevalence and identities of Fusarium species infecting tomatoes in Northwest Pakistan is currently not known. In this study, we surveyed and characterized Fusarium species associated with symptomatic tomatoes in Northwest Pakistan using morphological and molecular analyses. Pathogenicity tests revealed varying degrees of virulence with some Fusarium sp. causing severe disease symptoms whereas others displaying mild symptoms. Molecular identification based on Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region and TEF-1α gene sequencing classified all isolates into four major species with a majority (68.9%) belonging to Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti species complex (FIESC), followed by F. graminearum (20.7%), F. acuminatum (6.8%), and F. solani (6.8%). ISSR analyses revealed substantial genetic variability among all the Fusarium population infecting tomatoes. Genetic distance between populations from the central region and the type strain F.o. f.sp. lycopersici from Florida was the highest (0.3662), whereas between the south and central region was the lowest (0.0298), which showed that genetic exchange is negatively effected by distance. High genetic variability suggests that these Fusarium species have the potential to become a major production constraint for tomato growers. Findings in this report would greatly facilitate identification of Fusarium species in developing countries and would provide groundwork for devising and implementing disease management measures for minimizing losses caused by Fusarium species in tomatoes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30235252 PMCID: PMC6147440 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203613
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Geographical distribution, pathogenicity, virulence and morphological characteristics of Fusarium species in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
| District | Location | ID | Patho-genesis | Vir | Culture color | MSL of Macro-conidia | MSL of Micro-conidia | Macro-conidia septation | Chlamydo-spores | Morpho-logical identification | ITS | ISSR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swat | Shingardar | Pak-1 | + | HV | Whitish Brown/Brown | 37.7±7.5 | 9.7±1.6 | 3–5 | - | FIESC | 3 | ||
| Ghalegay | Pak-2 | + | LV | Whitish Brown/Brown | 35.2±2.4 | Nd | 3–5 | + | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Shamozai | Pak-3 | + | LV | Whitish Brown/Brown | 44.0±3.8 | Nd | 3–5 | + | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Takhtaband | Pak-4 | + | MV | White/Whitish Brown | Nd | Nd | 3–5 | + | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Mansehra | Bajna | Pak-5 | + | LV | Whitish Brown/ reddish Brown | 31.2±1.2 | Nd | 3–5 | + | FIESC | 3 | ||
| Khaki | Pak-6 | + | HV | White/ orange brown | 33.0±3.9 | Nd | 3–5 | + | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Panodehri | Pak-7 | - | - | Yellowish white/Yellow | 30.6±1.6 | Nd | 3–6 | + | UD | 2 | |||
| Bafamera | Pak-8 | - | - | Yellowish white/Yellow | 28.6±1.7 | Nd | 3–6 | + | UD | 2 | |||
| Shinkiari | Pak-9 | + | LV | Whitish Brown/Brown | 35.4±4.8 | Nd | 3–5 | - | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Charsadda | Harichand | Pak-10 | - | MV | White/Pink-orange | 32.0±2.8 | Nd | 4–6 | - | 1 | |||
| Mandani | Pak-11 | + | MV | Whitish brown/brown | 25.7±3.0 | Nd | 3–5 | - | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Prang Ghar | Pak-12 | + | LV | White/Brown | 32.5±3.8 | Nd | 3–5 | - | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Baramderai | Pak-13 | - | - | Olive green/ Light Brown | 29.9±4.4 | Nd | 4 | - | Unidentified | 3 | |||
| Shakoor | Pak-14 | - | - | White/Brown | 38.6±2.1 | Nd | 4–6 | + | 1 | ||||
| Peshawar | Malakandair | Pak-15 | + | MV | White/Whitish Brown | 39.1±1.8 | Nd | 3–5 | + | FIESC | 3 | ||
| Pakhaghulam | Pak-16 | + | LV | Whitish Brown/Brown | 56.7±3.5 | Nd | 3–5 | - | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Gari Baloch | Pak-17 | + | LV | Whitish Brown/Brown | 30.6±2.8 | Nd | 3–5 | - | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Palosai | Pak-18 | + | LV | Whitish Brown/Brown | 32.1±3.7 | Nd | 3–5 | - | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Taranab | Pak-19 | - | - | White/ Brown | 34.5±4.0 | Nd | 4–6 | - | 1 | ||||
| Malakand | Dargai | Pak-20 | + | MV | Whitish Brown/Creamy | 33.6±6.5 | Nd | 3–5 | + | FIESC | 3 | ||
| Sakhakot | Pak-21 | + | MV | Pale to brown/creamy | 29.0±5.3 | 4.3±1.0 | 3–7 | - | 3 | ||||
| Thana | Pak-22 | + | MV | White/Brown | 34.8±3.0 | Nd | 3–5 | + | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Chakdara | Pak-23 | + | MV | Brown/Reddish Brown | 29.9±4.2 | Nd | 3–5 | - | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Batkhela | Pak-24 | + | MV | Whitish Brown/Brown | 32.2±2.5 | Nd | 3–5 | - | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Swabi | Maini | Pak-25 | + | MV | Whitish Brown/Brown | 36.0±4.2 | Nd | 3–5 | - | FIESC | 3 | ||
| Bannu | Sarainurang | Pak-26 | - | - | White/Dark Pink | 40.3±5.4 | Nd | 3–6 | - | Unidentified | 2 | ||
| Kakki | Pak-27 | - | - | Whitish Brown/Reddish brown | 36±4.2 | Nd | 4–6 | - | 1 | ||||
| Ghoriwala | Pak-28 | + | MV | White/Dark Brown | 34± 4.3 | Nd | 3–5 | + | FIESC | 3 | |||
| Khojar | Pak-29 | + | MV | Pale to brown/creamy | 33.1±2.5 | 5.1±1.5 | 3–7 | - | 3 | ||||
| Florida | Fl-15 | White/Brown | 23.3±3.3 | 4.9±1.7 | 3–5 | - |
a Vir = virulence levels; HV, highly virulent; MV, moderately virulent; LV, low virulent;–, non-virulent
bMSL = mean spore length of macro and microconidia
cISSR = 1,2,3 refers to different group (Clades) of the isolates based on ISSR analysis
dNd = Not determined
Fig 1Geographical distribution of Fusarium species in Northern Pakistan.
(A) Map of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa showing locations of surveyed areas (B) Bar graph showing incidence and severity of Fusarium wilt in tomatoes in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa.
Fig 2Pathogenicity of Fusarium isolates based on results of detached tomato leaf assays.
Data are the average lesion size ±SD of three replications. Dotted lines demarcate boundaries among High (H, lesion size > 5 mm), Moderate (M, lesion size 3–5 mm) and Low (L, lesion size < 3 mm) virulence of isolates.
Fig 3Phylogenetic analysis of Fusarium species isolates based on rDNA ITS sequences using the UPGMA method.
The tree includes reference strains of F. o. f.sp. lycopersici and of other species identified. Bootstrap support was calculated from 1000 replicates. NP stands for non-pathogenic. Color of bars represent virulence levels, and color of stars represent different geographic locations.
Fig 4Phylogenetic analysis of Fusarium species isolates based on TEF-1α sequences using the UPGMA method.
The tree includes reference strains of F. o. f.sp. lycopersici and of other species identified. Bootstrap support was calculated from 1000 replicates. NP stands for non-pathogenic. Colors of bars represent virulence levels, and colors of stars represent different geographic locations.
Fig 5(A) Genetic fingerprints based on ISSR-PCR analyses with the ISSR primer (GA)9T and (GA)9C of 30 Fusarium species isolates. (B) UPGMA dendrogram of Fusarium species isolates based on the ISSR data showing relationship among different isolates reported in this study. Values at the nodes indicate confidence intervals of 1000 replicates. NP stands for non-pathogenic. Bootstrap values less than 50% were omitted. Colors of bars represent virulence levels, and colors of stars represent different geographic locations.
Genetic diversity and gene flow of Fusarium species in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa.
| Regions | PB | PPB | NA | NE | H | I | HT | HS | GST | NM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 88.89 | 1.889 | 1.486 | 0.286 | 0.434 | - | - | - | - | |
| 19 | 70.37 | 1.704 | 1.426 | 0.252 | 0.377 | - | - | - | - | |
| 25 | 92.59 | 1.926 | 1.465 | 0.284 | 0.438 | - | - | - | - | |
| 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - | - | - | |
| 17 | 62.962 | 1.629 | 1.344 | 0.2055 | 0.312 | |||||
| 0.307 | 0.205 | 0.331 | 1.011 |
a Genetic diversity parameters used in this studies are: PB, number of polymorphic bands; PPB, percentage of polymorphic bands; NA, observed number of alleles; NE, effective number of alleles; H, Nei’s gene diversity; I, Shannon’s information index; HT, total genetic diversity; HS, Genetic diversity within groups; GST, relative magnitude of genetic differentiation between populations; NM, gene flow.
Nei’s genetic identity and genetic distance.
| North | Central | South | Florida | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | 0.9611 | 0.9679 | 0.7459 | |
| 0.0396 | - | 0.9706 | 0.6934 | |
| 0.0326 | 0.0298 | - | 0.7312 | |
| 0.2932 | 0.3662 | 0.3130 | - |
Nei’s genetic identity (above diagonal) and genetic distance (below diagonal)