| Literature DB >> 35300015 |
Valentin Hinterberger1, Dimitar Douchkov1, Stefanie Lück1, Sandip Kale1, Martin Mascher1,2, Nils Stein1,3, Jochen C Reif1, Albert W Schulthess1.
Abstract
Genetic pathogen control is an economical and sustainable alternative to the use of chemicals. In order to breed resistant varieties, information about potentially unused genetic resistance mechanisms is of high value. We phenotyped 8,316 genotypes of the winter wheat collection of the German Federal ex situ gene bank for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops, Germany, for resistance to powdery mildew (PM), Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, one of the most important biotrophic pathogens in wheat. To achieve this, we used a semi-automatic phenotyping facility to perform high-throughput detached leaf assays. This data set, combined with genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) marker data, was used to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Alleles of significantly associated markers were compared with SNP profiles of 171 widely grown wheat varieties in Germany to identify currently unexploited resistance conferring genes. We also used the Chinese Spring reference genome annotation and various domain prediction algorithms to perform a domain enrichment analysis and produced a list of candidate genes for further investigation. We identified 51 significantly associated regions. In most of these, the susceptible allele was fixed in the tested commonly grown wheat varieties. Eleven of these were located on chromosomes for which no resistance conferring genes have been previously reported. In addition to enrichment of leucine-rich repeats (LRR), we saw enrichment of several domain types so far not reported as relevant to PM resistance, thus, indicating potentially novel candidate genes for the disease resistance research and prebreeding in wheat.Entities:
Keywords: candidate genes; detached leaf assay; genome-wide association mapping; microphenomics; phenotyping; powdery mildew; resistance; wheat
Year: 2022 PMID: 35300015 PMCID: PMC8922026 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.836723
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Schematic representation of the performed high-throughput detached leaf assay using the Macrobot Facility.
Figure 2Distribution of the mean percentage of infected leaf area of the control genotype (Kanzler) of the 437 experiments. The red bars indicate detected outlier experiments.
Variance components of the raw and the curated data set for powdery mildew infection measured as percentage of infected leaf area.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Experiment | 198.89 | 14.52 | 157.58 | 11.99 |
| Experiment:Tray | 25.46 | 2.29 | 26.03 | 2.35 |
| Genotype | 159.77 | 3.73 | 172.69 | 3.92 |
| Residual | 140.16 | 1.89 | 131.26 | 1.83 |
| Heritability | 0.73 | 0.75 | ||
| SD | 0.005 | 0.005 | ||
The factor “Experiment” reflects which genotypes were infected and measured in one batch, “Tray” reflects all genotypes grown in a tray in the greenhouse. All components shown are significant at a threshold of 0.01. The standard deviation (SD) of the heritability was estimated from 500 heritability estimates using different random samples containing 80% of the total genotypes.
Figure 3Distribution of Best Linear Unbiased Estimations (BLUEs) of the percentage of infected leaf area of (A) 170 European elite wheat cultivars and (B) 8,245 plant genetic resources (PGR). The dashed red line indicates the mean value.
Figure 4Principal coordinate analysis of the genotyped genotypes based on the Rogers' distances estimated using genotyping-by-sequencing profiles. PC1 and PC2 refer to the first and second coordinate, respectively. The proportion of explained molecular variance is indicated in parentheses. Blue dots denotes the elite cultivars, red ones the Donor genotypes carrying multiple beneficial alleles, gray ones the wheat genetic resources.
Figure 5Manhattan plot of the genome-wide association scans for powdery mildew resistance using Best Linear Unbiased Estimations (BLUEs) of wheat Plant genetic resources (PGR). The solid and dotted lines indicate the significant thresholds corrected for multiple testing using the standard Bonferroni correction (Bonferroni, 1935) and the number of effective markers (Gao et al., 2008), respectively.
Significant marker-trait associations (MTA) for powdery mildew resistance (PM-R) in winter wheat identified in a population of plant genetic resources (PGR) within the Wheat A-Genome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | Pm3a-r (3,9,94), Pm223899 (80), | 1 | 0.9617 | 1 | 5.45 | 0.00002 |
| 2 | 0.0031 | 0 | 5.27 | 0.013 | ||
| 2A | Pm4a-e (10,23,76,75,77) | 3 | 0.0033 | 0 | 5.19 | 0.006 |
| 4 | 0.0031 | 0 | 6.12 | 0.013 | ||
| 5 | 0.0015 | 0 | 8.3 | 0.007 | ||
| 3A | Pm44 (42) | 6 | 0.0098 | 0 | 5.38 | 0.005 |
| 7 | 0.0063 | 0 | 5.35 | 0.007 | ||
| 8 | 0.0014 | 0 | 5.88 | 0.003 | ||
| 9 | 0.003 | 0 | 6.2 | 0.014 | ||
| 5A | Pm55 (2), pm2026 (57) | 10 | 0.0038 | 0 | 6.4 | 0.013 |
| 7A | Pm1a-e (3,4,7) | 11 | 0.0098 | 0 | 6.58 | 0.012 |
| 12 | 0.0097 | 0.01 | 7.84 | 0.012 | ||
| 13 | 0.0094 | 0.01 | 7.53 | 0.011 | ||
| 14 | 0.0097 | 0.01 | 6.94 | 0.013 | ||
| 15 | 0.0101 | 0.01 | 7.78 | 0.012 | ||
| 16 | 0.0097 | 0.01 | 7.07 | 0.013 | ||
| 17 | 0.0101 | 0.01 | 9.14 | 0.013 | ||
| 18 | 0.0117 | 0.01 | 9.14 | 0.01 | ||
| 19 | 0.0098 | 0.01 | 6.43 | 0.013 | ||
| 20 | 0.0074 | 0.01 | 6.98 | 0.011 | ||
| 21 | 0.0071 | 0.01 | 8.25 | 0.011 | ||
| 22 | 0.0078 | 0.01 | 5.29 | 0.01 | ||
| 23 | 0.0089 | 0.01 | 5.99 | 0.013 | ||
| 24 | 0.0087 | 0.01 | 10.06 | 0.011 | ||
| 25 | 0.0074 | 0.01 | 6.74 | 0.009 | ||
| 26 | 0.0018 | 0.01 | 5.29 | 0.009 |
BAF is the frequency of the advantageous alleles within the PGR population (n = 7,510) and the elite population (Elite, n = 170). Sources: (1) Tan et al., .
Significant marker-trait associations (MTA) for powdery mildew resistance (PM-R) in winter wheat identified in a population of plant genetic resources (PGR) within the Wheat D-Genome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 39 | 0.0059 | 0 | 5.15 | 0.011 | |
| 40 | 0.0015 | 0 | 6.59 | 0.014 | ||
| 41 | 0.0014 | 0 | 5.48 | 0.013 | ||
| 2D | 42 | 0.0015 | 0 | 8.48 | 0.01 | |
| 3D | 43 | 0.0018 | 0 | 7.88 | 0.012 | |
| 45 | 0.002 | 0 | 6.8 | 0.014 | ||
| 46 | 0.0023 | 0 | 5.93 | 0.011 | ||
| 4D | 47 | 0.0046 | 0 | 5.35 | 0.009 | |
| 6D | 48 | 0.0029 | 0 | 5.48 | 0.01 | |
| 49 | 0.0027 | 0 | 6.68 | 0.007 | ||
| 7D | Pm38 (37), Pm29 (6,28) | 50 | 0.0026 | 0 | 22.22 | 0.009 |
| 51 | 0.0098 | 0.03 | 5.24 | 0.005 |
BAF is the frequency of the advantageous alleles within the PGR population (n = 7,510) and the elite population (Elite, n = 170). Sources: (6) Hsam et al., .
Significant marker-trait associations (MTA) for powdery mildew resistance (PM-R) in winter wheat identified in a population of plant genetic resources (PGR) within the Wheat B-Genome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1B | Pm8 (4) | 27 | 0.004 | 0 | 8.1 | 0.022 |
| 28 | 0.0034 | 0 | 6.8 | 0.022 | ||
| 29 | 0.0042 | 0 | 7.63 | 0.023 | ||
| 2B | 30 | 0.0038 | 0.03 | 20.32 | 0.022 | |
| 31 | 0.0033 | 0 | 6.21 | 0.022 | ||
| 32 | 0.0015 | 0 | 8.72 | 0.01 | ||
| 4B | 33 | 0.0035 | 0 | 7.75 | 0.016 | |
| 5B | Pm66 (83) | 34 | 0.0029 | 0 | 5.7 | 0.015 |
| 35 | 0.0027 | 0 | 5.19 | 0.015 | ||
| 6B | Pm11 (18), Pm12 (50), | 36 | 0.0014 | 0 | 5.71 | 0.004 |
| 37 | 0.0014 | 0.05 | 7.45 | 0.005 | ||
| 7B | Pm40 (14,38), Pm47 (45), | 38 | 0.0037 | 0 | 5.33 | 0.006 |
BAF is the frequency of the advantageous alleles within the PGR population (n = 7,510) and the elite population (Elite, n = 170). Sources: (4) Hsam et al., .