Literature DB >> 26095659

Meropenem therapy in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: an ongoing pharmacokinetic challenge.

Patrick M Honore1, Rita Jacobs2, Inne Hendrickx2, Elisabeth De Waele2, Viola Van Gorp2, Herbert D Spapen2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26095659      PMCID: PMC4476232          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0953-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
We agree with the recent commentary of Gonçalves-Pereira and Oliveira refuting a ‘one size fits all’ paradigm of antibiotic dosing in patients subjected to extracorporeal circulation [1] but want to focus somewhat further on meropenem pharmacokinetics (PK). Meropenem has optimal bactericidal activity if plasma levels remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration of the pathogen for at least 40 % of the dosing interval. Still, many patients with severe sepsis do not attain this PK target, have unpredictable PK changes or show large individual and inter-patient variability in distribution volume and clearance when treated with recommended meropenem doses [2, 3]. Meropenem is degraded and significantly sequestered in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit after 4 to 6 h of treatment. ECMO also induces a systemic inflammatory response which, independently of underlying sepsis, impairs normal meropenem PK [4]. Thus, optimization of meropenem treatment during ECMO requires either more frequent dosing, a dose increase, or prolonged infusion. Ideally, meropenem should be infused continuously over 24 h but, due to its relative instability at room temperature, only a 3-hour infusion is safely feasible. We suggest to administer a 3-hour infusion of 2 g meropenem every 6 h [4]. Future adaptations must be anticipated. We refer to the recently proposed concept of ‘dose modulation’, which concentrates the largest weight of antibiotics front-end when the microbial load is highest and gradually reduces antibiotic dose as sepsis improves [5]. This would imply increasing the loading dose of meropenem (4 g?) and ensuring an adequate maintenance dose guided by PK parameters.
  4 in total

1.  Dose modulation: a new concept of antibiotic therapy in the critically ill patient?

Authors:  Joao Goncalves-Pereira; José-Artur Paiva
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.425

2.  Insufficient β-lactam concentrations in the early phase of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Fabio Silvio Taccone; Pierre-François Laterre; Thierry Dugernier; Herbert Spapen; Isabelle Delattre; Xavier Wittebole; Daniel De Backer; Brice Layeux; Pierre Wallemacq; Jean-Louis Vincent; Frédérique Jacobs
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis and without renal dysfunction: intermittent bolus versus continuous administration? Monte Carlo dosing simulations and subcutaneous tissue distribution.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Michael S Roberts; Thomas A Robertson; Andrew J Dalley; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Antibiotics and extracorporeal circulation--one size does not fit all.

Authors:  João Gonçalves-Pereira; Bruno Oliveira
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Meropenem in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Jumpei Saito; Kensuke Shoji; Yusuke Oho; Hiroki Kato; Shotaro Matsumoto; Satoshi Aoki; Hidefumi Nakamura; Takanori Ogawa; Mayumi Hasegawa; Akimasa Yamatani; Isao Miyairi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Prevention and treatment of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: an update.

Authors:  Patrick M Honore; Rita Jacobs; Inne Hendrickx; Sean M Bagshaw; Olivier Joannes-Boyau; Willem Boer; Elisabeth De Waele; Viola Van Gorp; Herbert D Spapen
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 6.925

3.  Evaluation of Meropenem Pharmacokinetics in an Experimental Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Model during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) by Using a PenP β-Lactamase Biosensor.

Authors:  Max Andresen; Joaquin Araos; Kwok-Yin Wong; Yun-Chung Leung; Lok-Yan So; Wai-Ting Wong; Salvador Cabrera; Camila Silva; Leyla Alegria; Alejandro Bruhn; Dagoberto Soto
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Effects of ex vivo Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuits on Sequestration of Antimicrobial Agents.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Hongbin Hu; Qing Zhang; Qing Ou; Huayou Zhou; Tong Sha; Zhenhua Zeng; Jie Wu; Jingrui Lu; Zhongqing Chen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-01

5.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Anti-infective Agents during Continuous Veno-venous Hemofiltration in Critically Ill Patients: Lessons Learned from an Ancillary Study of the IVOIRE Trial.

Authors:  Dominique Breilh; Patrick M Honore; David De Bels; Jason A Roberts; Jean Baptiste Gordien; Catherine Fleureau; Antoine Dewitte; Julien Coquin; Hadrien Rozé; Paul Perez; Rachid Attou; Sebastien Redant; Luc Kugener; Marie-Claude Saux; Herbert D Spapen; Alexandre Ouattara; Olivier Joannes-Boyau
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2019-12-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.