Literature DB >> 19398460

Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis and without renal dysfunction: intermittent bolus versus continuous administration? Monte Carlo dosing simulations and subcutaneous tissue distribution.

Jason A Roberts1, Carl M J Kirkpatrick, Michael S Roberts, Thomas A Robertson, Andrew J Dalley, Jeffrey Lipman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the plasma and subcutaneous tissue concentration-time profiles of meropenem administered by intermittent bolus dosing or continuous infusion to critically ill patients with sepsis and without renal dysfunction, and to use population pharmacokinetic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations to assess the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against Gram-negative pathogens likely to be encountered in critical care units. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomized 10 patients with sepsis to receive meropenem by intermittent bolus administration (n = 5; 1 g 8 hourly) or an equal dose administered by continuous infusion (n = 5). Serial subcutaneous tissue concentrations were determined using microdialysis and compared with plasma data for first-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics. Population pharmacokinetic modelling of plasma data and Monte Carlo simulations were then undertaken with NONMEM.
RESULTS: It was found that continuous infusion maintains higher median trough concentrations, in both plasma (intermittent bolus 0 versus infusion 7 mg/L) and subcutaneous tissue (0 versus 4 mg/L). All simulated intermittent bolus, extended and continuous infusion dosing achieved 100% of pharmacodynamic targets against most Gram-negative pathogens. Superior obtainment of pharmacodynamic targets was achieved using administration by extended or continuous infusion against less susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to compare the relative concentration-time data of bolus and continuous administration of meropenem at the subcutaneous tissue and plasma levels. We found that the administration of meropenem by continuous infusion maintains higher concentrations in subcutaneous tissue and plasma than by intermittent bolus dosing. Administration by extended or continuous infusion will achieve superior CFR against less-susceptible organisms in patients without renal dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19398460     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  99 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the management of sepsis and the understanding of key immunologic defects.

Authors:  Lee P Skrupky; Paul W Kerby; Richard S Hotchkiss
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Substantial Impact of Altered Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients on the Antibacterial Effects of Meropenem Evaluated via the Dynamic Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  Phillip J Bergen; Jürgen B Bulitta; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Kate E Rogers; Megan J McGregor; Steven C Wallis; David L Paterson; Roger L Nation; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Cornelia B Landersdorfer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Clinical implications of antibiotic pharmacokinetic principles in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Polymyxin B in combination with meropenem against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: pharmacodynamics and morphological changes.

Authors:  Rajnikant Sharma; Saloni Patel; Cely Abboud; John Diep; Neang S Ly; Jason M Pogue; Keith S Kaye; Jian Li; Gauri G Rao
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 5.  Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Robert J Boots; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Dose Optimization of Colistin Combinations against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii from Patients with Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia in China by Using an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model.

Authors:  Xingchen Bian; Xiaofen Liu; Yuancheng Chen; Daijie Chen; Jian Li; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  The Japanese guidelines for the management of sepsis.

Authors:  Shigeto Oda; Mayuki Aibiki; Toshiaki Ikeda; Hitoshi Imaizumi; Shigeatsu Endo; Ryoichi Ochiai; Joji Kotani; Nobuaki Shime; Osamu Nishida; Takayuki Noguchi; Naoyuki Matsuda; Hiroyuki Hirasawa
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2014-10-28

8.  Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem in elderly patients: dosing simulations based on renal function.

Authors:  Muhammad Usman; Otto R Frey; Georg Hempel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  [Therapeutic drug monitoring and individual dosing of antibiotics during sepsis : Modern or just "trendy"?]

Authors:  A Brinkmann; A C Röhr; A Köberer; T Fuchs; J Preisenberger; W A Krüger; O R Frey
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 0.840

10.  Polymyxin B in Combination with Antimicrobials Lacking In Vitro Activity versus Polymyxin B in Monotherapy in Critically Ill Patients with Acinetobacter baumannii or Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections.

Authors:  Maria Helena Rigatto; Fabiane J Vieira; Laura C Antochevis; Tainá F Behle; Natane T Lopes; Alexandre P Zavascki
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.