BACKGROUND: This study used Community Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) to address low participation of racial and ethnic minorities in medical research and the lack of trust between underrepresented communities and researchers. METHODS: Using a community and academic partnership in July 2012, residents of a South Los Angeles neighborhood were exposed to research recruitment strategies: referral by word-of-mouth, community agencies, direct marketing, and extant study participants. RESULTS: Among 258 community members exposed to recruitment strategies, 79.8% completed the study. Exposed individuals identified their most important method for learning about the study as referral by study participants (39.8%), community agencies (30.6%), word-of-mouth (17.5%), or direct marketing promotion (12.1%). Study completion rates varied by recruitment method: referral by community agencies (88.7%), referral by participants (80.4%), direct marketing promotion (86.2%), word of mouth (64.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Although African American and Latino communities are often described as difficult to engage in research, we found high levels of research participation and completion when recruitment strategies emerged from the community itself. This suggests recruitment strategies based on CPPR principles represent an important opportunity for addressing health disparities and our high rates of research completion should provide optimism and a road map for next steps.
BACKGROUND: This study used Community Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) to address low participation of racial and ethnic minorities in medical research and the lack of trust between underrepresented communities and researchers. METHODS: Using a community and academic partnership in July 2012, residents of a South Los Angeles neighborhood were exposed to research recruitment strategies: referral by word-of-mouth, community agencies, direct marketing, and extant study participants. RESULTS: Among 258 community members exposed to recruitment strategies, 79.8% completed the study. Exposed individuals identified their most important method for learning about the study as referral by study participants (39.8%), community agencies (30.6%), word-of-mouth (17.5%), or direct marketing promotion (12.1%). Study completion rates varied by recruitment method: referral by community agencies (88.7%), referral by participants (80.4%), direct marketing promotion (86.2%), word of mouth (64.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Although African American and Latino communities are often described as difficult to engage in research, we found high levels of research participation and completion when recruitment strategies emerged from the community itself. This suggests recruitment strategies based on CPPR principles represent an important opportunity for addressing health disparities and our high rates of research completion should provide optimism and a road map for next steps.
Authors: Letha A Chadiha; Olivia G M Washington; Peter A Lichtenberg; Carmen R Green; Karen L Daniels; James S Jackson Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2011-06
Authors: Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-03-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Electra D Paskett; Katherine W Reeves; John M McLaughlin; Mira L Katz; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Mack T Ruffin; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Cristina Merete; Faith Davis; Sarah Gehlert Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Linda L Wong; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Victoria Page; Glen Hayashida; Amy S You; Connie M Rhee Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Laura B Oswald; Judy Guitelman; Diana Buitrago; Joanna Buscemi; Francisco Iacobelli; Alejandra Perez-Tamayo; Frank Penedo; Betina Yanez Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2019
Authors: Jimmie L Slade; Cheryl L Holt; Janice Bowie; Mary Ann Scheirer; Ebony Toussaint; Darlene R Saunders; Alma Savoy; Roxanne L Carter; Sherie Lou Santos Journal: J Relig Health Date: 2018-04
Authors: Angelle M Sander; Anthony H Lequerica; Jessica M Ketchum; Flora M Hammond; Kelli Williams Gary; Monique R Pappadis; Elizabeth R Felix; Douglas Johnson-Greene; Tamara Bushnik Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2018 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Arleen F Brown; D'Ann M Morris; Katherine L Kahn; Ibrahima C Sankaré; Keyonna M King; Roberto Vargas; Aziza Lucas-Wright; Loretta F Jones; Astrea Flowers; Felica U Jones; Rachelle Bross; Dennishia Banner; Homero E Del Pino; Orwilda L Pitts; Lujia Zhang; Courtney Porter; Sigrid K Madrigal; Stefanie D Vassar; Sitaram Vangala; Li-Jung Liang; Arturo B Martinez; Keith C Norris Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Jennifer Cunningham-Erves; Tilicia L Mayo-Gamble; Pamela C Hull; Tao Lu; Claudia Barajas; Caree R McAfee; Maureen Sanderson; Juan R Canedo; Katina Beard; Consuelo H Wilkins Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 2.532