Literature DB >> 15968561

Reimbursement and clinical guidance for pharmaceuticals in Sweden: do health-economic evaluations support decision making?

Anders Anell1, Ulf Persson.   

Abstract

Introduction of the new Pharmaceutical Benefits Board (LFN; 1 October 2002) has markedly changed the principles of pricing and reimbursement of drugs in Sweden. The Board is required to make decisions based on information on cost-effectiveness, and pharmaceutical companies must submit economic evaluations when relevant as part of their applications for reimbursement. This study examined experience to date regarding the use of health-economic evaluations and cost-effectiveness information by the LFN. We also describe activities and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis by Swedish local formulary committees organized by the 21 county councils. It is concluded that economic evaluations have supported decision making by LFN, although cost-effectiveness seems to be of varying importance in different situations. While the use of health-economic evaluations and the outcome of decision making by LFN are similar to comparable committees in other countries, there is presently a gap in this sense between the LFN and Swedish local formulary committees. Coordinated decision making is much needed but may be difficult to implement as the perspective, expertise, and objectives of the two public authorities differ.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15968561     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-005-0301-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  8 in total

Review 1.  International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.

Authors:  Adrian R Levy; Craig Mitton; Karissa M Johnston; Brian Harrigan; Andrew H Briggs
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Deborah Marshall; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Recent national and regional drug reforms in Sweden: implications for pharmaceutical companies in Europe.

Authors:  Björn Wettermark; Brian Godman; Karolina Andersson; Lars L Gustafsson; Alan Haycox; Vittorio Bertele
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Health technology funding decision-making processes around the world: the same, yet different.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Donald J Philippon; Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Reimbursement Decisions for Pharmaceuticals in Sweden: The Impact of Disease Severity and Cost Effectiveness.

Authors:  Mikael Svensson; Fredrik O L Nilsson; Karl Arnberg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Parallel imports and a mandatory substitution reform: a kick or a muff for price competition in pharmaceuticals?

Authors:  David Granlund; Miyase Yesim Koksal-Ayhan
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-11-18

Review 7.  A National Approach to Reimbursement Decision-Making on Drugs for Rare Diseases in Canada? Insights from Across the Ponds.

Authors:  Hilary Short; Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-05

Review 8.  A systematic review of cost-sharing strategies used within publicly-funded drug plans in member countries of the organisation for economic co-operation and development.

Authors:  Lianne Barnieh; Fiona Clement; Anthony Harris; Marja Blom; Cam Donaldson; Scott Klarenbach; Don Husereau; Diane Lorenzetti; Braden Manns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.