Literature DB >> 18831505

Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications.

Franca M A Melfi1, Alfredo Mussi.   

Abstract

The past two decades have witnessed a revolutionary transition in surgical technique and technology with the development of minimally invasive approaches. Many advantages were obtained by using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: less surgical trauma and pain, shorter hospital stay, and satisfactory cosmetic results. Limitations still remain, however, because of impaired vision, restricted instrument-maneuverability, unstable camera platform, and poor ergonomics for the surgeon. Some of the more prominent limitations involve the technical and mechanical nature of the equipment. This article describes technical aspects, learning curve, and complications in the field of robotic lobectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18831505     DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2008.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin            Impact factor:   1.750


  43 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Surgery for Thoracic Disease.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Yamashita; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Akinori Iwasaki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 1.520

2.  Effect of gender on perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy.

Authors:  Jessica R Glover; Frank O Velez-Cubian; Wei Wei Zhang; Kavian Toosi; Tawee Tanvetyanon; Emily P Ng; Carla C Moodie; Joseph R Garrett; Jacques P Fontaine; Eric M Toloza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive vs. thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting.

Authors:  Florian Augustin; Johannes Bodner; Herbert Maier; Christoph Schwinghammer; Burkhard Pichler; Paolo Lucciarini; Johann Pratschke; Thomas Schmid
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  [Application of the da Vinci robotic system in thoracic surgery].

Authors:  M Ismail; M Swierzy; M Ulrich; J C Rückert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on pulmonary resections by robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Con Manganas; Su C Ang; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

6.  Robotic-assisted pulmonary resection - Right upper lobectomy.

Authors:  Robert J Cerfolio; Ayesha S Bryant
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

7.  Robotic anatomic lung resections: the initial experience and description of learning in 102 cases.

Authors:  Alper Toker; Mehmet Oğuzhan Özyurtkan; Erkan Kaba; Kemal Ayalp; Özkan Demirhan; Elena Uyumaz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic assisted lung resection needs further evidence.

Authors:  Marcello Migliore
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Robotic resection of stage III lung cancer: an international retrospective study.

Authors:  Monica Casiraghi; Lorenzo Spaggiari
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  From "open" to robotic assisted thoracic surgery: why RATS and not VATS?

Authors:  Sara Ricciardi; Federico Davini; Carmelina Cristina Zirafa; Franca Melfi
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.