| Literature DB >> 26090613 |
Kei Mitsuhashi1, Itaru Yamamoto1, Hiroyoshi Kurihara1, Shinichi Kanno1, Miki Ito1, Hisayoshi Igarashi1, Keisuke Ishigami1, Yasutaka Sukawa1,2, Mami Tachibana1, Hiroaki Takahashi3, Takashi Tokino4, Reo Maruyama5, Hiromu Suzuki5, Kohzoh Imai6, Yasuhisa Shinomura1, Hiroyuki Yamamoto7, Katsuhiko Nosho1.
Abstract
Although gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors are relatively rare in the digestive tract, a quarter of them are present in the rectum. In the absence of specific tumor biomarkers, lymphatic or vascular invasion is generally used to predict the risk of lymph node metastasis. We, therefore, examined the genetic and epigenetic alterations potentially associated with lymphovascular invasion among 56 patients with rectal carcinoid tumors. We also conducted a microRNA (miRNA) array analysis. Our analysis failed to detect mutations in BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, or PIK3CA or any microsatellite instability (MSI); however, we did observe CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) positivity in 13% (7/56) of the carcinoid tumors. The CIMP-positive status was significantly correlated with lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.036). The array analysis revealed that microRNA-885 (miR-885)-5p was the most up-regulated miRNA in the carcinoid tumors with lymphovascular invasion compared with that in those without invasion. In addition, high miR-885-5p expression was independently associated with lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.0002). In conclusion, our findings suggest that miR-885-5p and CIMP status may be useful biomarkers for predicting biological malignancy in patients with rectal carcinoid tumors.Entities:
Keywords: carcinoid; epigenetics; neuroendocrine tumor; non-coding RNA; rectum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26090613 PMCID: PMC4673150 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Frequencies of CACNA1G, CDKN2A (p16), IGFBP7, IGF2, MGMT, MINT1, MINT2, MINT31, MLH1, RASSF2, and RUNX3 methylations in 56 rectal carcinoid tumors
Clinical and molecular features of rectal carcinoid tumors by lymphovascular invasion
| Clinical and molecular feature | Total | Lymphovascular invasion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | |||
| All cases | 56 | 43 | 13 | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 29 (52%) | 21 (49%) | 8 (62%) | 0.42 |
| Female | 27 (48%) | 22 (51%) | 5 (38%) | |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 58.9 ± 13.9 | 58.3 ± 2.1 | 61.0 ± 3.8 | 0.53 |
| Tumor size (mm) (mean ± SD) | 6.2 ± 2.5 | 5.9 ± 0.37 | 7.0 ± 0.68 | 0.17 |
| Wild-type | 56 (100%) | 43 (100%) | 13 (0%) | N/A |
| Mutated | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Wild-type | 56 (100%) | 43 (100%) | 13 (0%) | N/A |
| Mutated | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Wild-type | 56 (100%) | 43 (100%) | 13 (0%) | N/A |
| Mutated | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Wild-type | 56 (100%) | 43 (100%) | 13 (0%) | N/A |
| Mutated | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Unmethylated | 55 (98%) | 42 (98%) | 13 (100%) | 0.47 |
| Methylated | 1 (1.8%) | 1 (2.3%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Unmethylated | 38 (68%) | 32 (74%) | 6 (46%) | 0.062 |
| Methylated | 18 (32%) | 11 (26%) | 7 (54%) | |
| Unmethylated | 56 (100%) | 43 (100%) | 13 (0%) | N/A |
| Methylated | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Unmethylated | 49 (87%) | 40 (93%) | 9 (69%) | 0.036 |
| Methylated | 7 (13%) | 3 (7.0%) | 4 (31%) | |
| Unmethylated | 55 (98%) | 43 (100%) | 12 (92%) | 0.084 |
| Methylated | 1 (1.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (7.7%) | |
| Unmethylated | 28 (50%) | 22 (51%) | 6 (46%) | 0.75 |
| Methylated | 28 (50%) | 21 (49%) | 7 (54%) | |
| Unmethylated | 41 (73%) | 33 (77%) | 8 (62%) | 0.29 |
| Methylated | 15 (27%) | 10 (23%) | 5 (38%) | |
| Unmethylated | 22 (39%) | 20 (47%) | 2 (15%) | 0.034 |
| Methylated | 34 (61%) | 23 (53%) | 11 (85%) | |
| Unmethylated | 53 (95%) | 43 (100%) | 10 (77%) | 0.0022 |
| Methylated | 3 (5.4%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (23%) | |
| Unmethylated | 55 (98%) | 43 (100%) | 12 (92%) | 0.084 |
| Methylated | 1 (1.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (7.7%) | |
| Unmethylated | 56 (100%) | 43 (100%) | 13 (100%) | N/A |
| Methylated | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| CIMP status | ||||
| CIMP negative | 49 (87%) | 40 (93%) | 9 (69%) | 0.036 |
| CIMP positive | 7 (13%) | 3 (7%) | 4 (31%) | |
| MSI status | ||||
| MSI-low/MSS | 56 (100%) | 43 (100%) | 13 (100%) | N/A |
| MSI-high | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
Percentages (%) indicate the proportion of cases with a specific clinical or molecular feature within a given dichotomous category of lymphovascular invasion status. CIMP positivity was defined as the presence of four or more of the six methylated promoters [CDKN2A (p16), IGF2, MINT1, MINT2, MINT31, and MLH1]. The P-values were calculated using t-test for age and tumor size and by means of the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for all other variables.
CIMP, CpG island methylator phenotype; MSI, microsatellite instability; N/A, not applicable; SD, standard deviation.
Differentially expressed microRNAs in lymphovascular invasion positive and negative rectal carcinoid tumors by microRNA array analysis
| No. | Name of microRNA(miR Base ID) | Relative microRNA expression (microRNA/U6) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lymphovascular invasion | Fold change (Positive group / Negative group) | ||||
| Negative group (median; | Positive group (median; | ||||
| 1 | hsa-miR-885-5p | 0.053 | 46.6 | 878 | 0.037 |
| 2 | hsa-miR-216b | 0.032 | 5.9 | 187 | 0.32 |
| 3 | hsa-miR-204 | 0.27 | 43.6 | 160 | 0.057 |
| 4 | hsa-miR-198 | 1.3 | 159.5 | 122 | 0.17 |
| 5 | hsa-miR-135a | 6.0 | 582.0 | 96 | 0.049 |
| 6 | hsa-miR-452 | 0.39 | 15.9 | 41 | 0.79 |
| 7 | hsa-miR-216a | 0.0012 | 0.047 | 38 | 0.15 |
| 8 | hsa-miR-486-3p | 0.39 | 14.6 | 38 | 0.024 |
| 9 | mmu-miR-499 | 0.36 | 13.4 | 38 | 0.056 |
| 10 | hsa-miR-146b-3p | 0.44 | 14.6 | 33 | 0.083 |
The fold change is expressed as the median of that for the rectal carcinoid tumors with lymphovascular invasion divided by those without lymphovascular invasion for each microRNA. P-values were determined by the Mann-Whitney U test.
Clinicopathological and molecular features of rectal carcinoid tumors by miR-885-5p expression
| Clinicopathological and molecular feature | Total | miR-885-5p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low expression | High expression | |||
| All cases | 56 | 51 | 5 | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 29 (52%) | 26 (51%) | 3 (60%) | 0.70 |
| Female | 27 (48%) | 25 (49%) | 2 (40%) | |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 58.9 ± 13.9 | 57.2 ± 6.2 | 59.1 ± 1.9 | 0.78 |
| Tumor size (mm) (mean ± SD) | 6.2 ± 2.5 | 7.0 ± 1.1 | 6.1 ± 0.35 | 0.44 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | ||||
| Negative | 43 (77%) | 43 (84%) | 0 (0%) | <0.0001 |
| Positive | 13 (23%) | 8 (16%) | 5 (100%) | |
| Unmethylated | 38 (68%) | 36 (71%) | 2 (40%) | 0.18 |
| Methylated | 18 (32%) | 15 (29%) | 3 (60%) | |
| Unmethylated | 49 (87%) | 46 (90%) | 3 (60%) | 0.097 |
| Methylated | 7 (13%) | 5 (9.8%) | 2 (40%) | |
| Unmethylated | 28 (50%) | 25 (49%) | 3 (60%) | 0.64 |
| Methylated | 28 (50%) | 26 (51%) | 2 (40%) | |
| Unmethylated | 41 (73%) | 38 (75%) | 3 (60%) | 0.50 |
| Methylated | 15 (27%) | 13 (25%) | 2 (40%) | |
| Unmethylated | 22 (39%) | 20 (39%) | 2 (40%) | 0.97 |
| Methylated | 34 (61%) | 31 (61%) | 3 (60%) | |
| Unmethylated | 53 (95%) | 50 (98%) | 3 (60%) | 0.0090 |
| Methylated | 3 (5.3%) | 1 (2.0%) | 2 (40%) | |
| CIMP status | ||||
| Negative | 7 (13%) | 5 (9.8%) | 2 (40%) | 0.098 |
| Positive | 49 (87%) | 46 (90%) | 3 (60%) | |
Percentage (%) indicates the proportion of cases with a specific clinicopathological or molecular feature according to miR-885-5p expression status. CIMP positivity was defined as the presence of four or more of the six methylated promoters [CDKN2A (p16), IGF2, MINT1, MINT2, MINT31, and MLH1]. P-values were calculated by t-test for age and tumor size and by a chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for all other variables.
CIMP, CpG island methylator phenotype; miR-885, microRNA-885; SD, standard deviation.