Literature DB >> 26090162

Crystal structure of seleno-l-cystine di-hydro-chloride.

Carl Henrik Görbitz1, Vladimir Levchenko1, Jevgenijs Semjonovs1, Mohamed Yusuf Sharif1.   

Abstract

Numerous crystal structures are available for the dimeric amino acid cystine. In proteins it is formed by oxidation of the -SH thiol groups of two closely spaced cysteine residues, resulting in the formation of a familiar di-sulfide bridge. The title compound [systematic name: (R,R)-1,1'-dicarb-oxy-2,2'-(diselanedi-yl)diethanaminium dichloride], C6H14N2O4Se2 (2+)·2Cl(-), is the first example of a small mol-ecule structure of the biologically important analogue with a -CH2-Se-Se-CH2- bridging unit. Bond lengths and angles of seleno-l-cystine di-hydro-chloride and its isotypic sulfur analogue l-cystine di-hydro-chloride are compared.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Se—Se bridge; cancer therapy; crystal structure; isotypism; l-cystine analogue

Year:  2015        PMID: 26090162      PMCID: PMC4459342          DOI: 10.1107/S205698901501021X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

In addition to the 20 amino acids directly encoded by the genetic code, three more are incorporated into proteins during translation. These three, seleno­cystine, pyrrolysine and N-formyl­methio­nine, are considered to belong to a group of 23 proteinogenic amino acids. The UGA codon, normally a stop codon, is made to encode seleno­cysteine by the presence of a seleno­cysteine insertion sequence (SECIS) in the mRNA (Kryukov et al., 2003 ▸). Analogous to the common sulfur analogue cysteine, seleno­cysteine dimerizes through the formation of an SeSe bridge to seleno­cystin, a substance that has received considerable attention recently for its anti­cancer efficacy (Yu et al., 2015 ▸) as well as its potential in the prevention of cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases (Weekley & Harris, 2013 ▸). In the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, version 5.36; Groom & Allen, 2014 ▸) there are about 80 distinct structures of cystine deposited, either as an amino acid, a modified amino acid or as an integrate part of a peptide or another large organic mol­ecule. In contrast, there are no entries for seleno­cystine (and also none for sulfurselenium hybrids with a —CH2—S—Se—CH2— bridge). To provide detailed structural information for this biologically important link, an investigation of its structure, in the di­hydro­chloride salt C6H14N2O4Se2 2+·2Cl−, (I), has been undertaken.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of (I) is shown in Fig. 1 ▸ a. A twofold rotation axis relates the two parts of the mol­ecule. The crystal packing is depicted in Fig. 2 ▸, with mol­ecules stacked on top of each other along the 5.2529 (4) Å monoclinic axis. Compound (I) is isotypic with the structure of l-cystine di­hydro­chloride, (II) (Gupta et al., 1974 ▸; Jones et al., 1974 ▸; Leela & Ramamurthi, 2007 ▸), but not with the structure of l-cystine di­hydro­bromide (Anbuchezhiyan et al., 2010 ▸), which forms a related packing arrangement but crystallizes in the ortho­rhom­bic space group P21212. The di­sulfide/diselenide bridges adopt helical conformations in all three structures, characterized by having gauche —C—C—X—X—, —C—X—X—C— and —X—X—C—C— torsion angles (X = S or Se) of the same sign, in this case between −81 and −89° [Table 1 ▸; —C—C—X—X— = —X—X—C—C— by symmetry]. Geometric parameters for (I) and (II) are furthermore compared in Table 1 ▸ with average values from 16 acyclic —CH2—SeSe—CH2— links in non-amino acid structures retrieved from the CSD (Groom & Allen, 2014 ▸). The bond lengths and bond angles of (I) are similar to those in the previous seleno structures. The most important differences with respect to (II) [X-ray data at 173 K: a = 18.4405 (15), b = 5.2116 (6), c = 7.2191 (6) Å, β = 103.856 (6)°; Leela & Ramamurthi, 2007 ▸] are (obviously) the two SeSe and S—S bond lengths, with modest changes for bond angles and torsion angles. Concerning the dimensions of the unit cell, there is above all an increase in the length of the cell edge a (+ 0.364 Å, 2%) due to longer C—Se than C—S bonds. An equivalent, anti­cipated effect on c as a result of the increased length of the SeSe bond, which runs parallel to the z axis, is effectively counteracted by a 2.52° decrease for the two C—SeSe angles along the bridge compared to the C—S—S angles, see: Fig. 1 ▸ b and Table 1 ▸. The length of the short monoclinic axis b is determined by direct stacking of amino acid mol­ecules, for which the S-to-Se substitution has less impact since neither is involved in any close inter­molecular contacts.
Figure 1

(a) The mol­ecular structure of seleno-l-cystine di­hydro­chloride. The right-hand part, coloured in a light tone, is generated by application of twofold rotation symmetry in space group C2; Se1*, C3* etc are generated by the symmetry code −x + 1, y, −z. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. (b) Best overlap between the structures of (I) (dark grey O, N and C atoms) and (II) (light grey; Leela & Ramamurthi, 2007 ▸) with a root-mean-square deviation of 0.133 Å. The view is along the twofold rotation axis (lens-shaped symbol), the dashed line gives the direction of the z axis.

Figure 2

The crystal packing of seleno-l-cystine di­hydro­chloride viewed approximately along the b axis.

Table 1

Geometric parameters (, ) of diselenide and disulfide bridges

CompoundCSe/CSSeSe/SSCCSe/SCSe/SSe/SCCSe/SSe/SCSe/SSe/SC
(I)1.9671(18)2.3213(4)113.96(12)100.88(5)88.72(12)83.05(10)
Averagea 1.9672.310114.17101.29  
(II)b 1.8172.040114.48103.4089.0481.04

Notes: (a) average of 16 CH2SeSeCH2 bridges in acyclic non-amino acid structures; (b) Leela Ramamurthi (2007 ▸).

Supra­molecular features

The four strong hydrogen bonds with N—H and O—H donors all have Cl− as the acceptor atom (Fig. 3 ▸ a). The geometric parameters of the hydrogen bonds listed in Table 2 ▸ are almost identical to those of (II). There is also a three-centre inter­action with a Cα—H donor and two carbonyl oxygen atoms as acceptors, Fig. 3 ▸ b.
Figure 3

(a) Stereodrawing showing the coordination of hydrogen-bond donors around a Cl− anion (see Table 2 ▸ for symmetry operators). (b) Tape motif along the b axis generated from Cα—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. O1* is at (x, y + 1, z), O1′ at (−x + , y + , −z + 1). Side chains have been truncated beyond Cβ.

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
N1H1Cl1i 0.912.253.1425(16)167
N1H2Cl1ii 0.912.403.2110(18)149
N1H3Cl1iii 0.912.323.1794(15)157
O2H4Cl10.79(6)2.22(6)3.0080(19)172(4)
C2H21O1iv 1.002.393.292(2)150
C2H21O1iii 1.002.553.216(2)124

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

Synthesis and crystallization

Seleno­cystine has very low solubility in water as well as in organic solvents, including tri­fluoro­ethanol and 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexa­fluoro­propan-2-ol, so a saturated solution was prepared in 0.1 M NaOH solution. 100 µl of this solution was pipetted into a small test tube (5 × 50 mm) to which a small amount of BTB pH indicator was added. The tube was sealed with parafilm punctured with a needle (one small hole) and placed inside a larger tube with concentrated hydro­chloric acid. After 15 h the colour had shifted from blue to green, and small crystals of the hydro­chloride could be harvested.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. The position of the carboxyl H atom was restrained to the plane defined by O1, O2, C1 and C2; other H atoms were positioned with idealized geometry with fixed C/N—H distances for NH3, CH2 (methyl­ene) and CH (methine) groups of 0.91, 0.99 and 1.00 Å, respectively. Free rotation was permitted for the ammonium group. U iso(H) values were set to 1.2U eq of the carrier atom, or 1.5U eq for the ammonium group.
Table 3

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6H14N2O4Se2 2+2(Cl)
M r 407.02
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c ()18.8045(16), 5.2529(4), 7.2719(6)
()102.219(1)
V (3)702.03(10)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo K
(mm1)5.65
Crystal size (mm)0.85 0.08 0.07
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker D8 Advance single-crystal CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
T min, T max 0.514, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections11089, 4209, 4080
R int 0.024
(sin /)max (1)0.908
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.023, 0.062, 1.10
No. of reflections4209
No. of parameters78
No. of restraints3
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
max, min (e 3)4.55, 0.87
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 1708 quotients (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter0.044(4)

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2014 ▸), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▸).

A rather large residual peak in the electron density map, with Δρmax = 4.55 e Å−3, remained after completion of the refinement. This peak is located on the twofold rotation axis at the center of the SeSe bond, and evidently reflects bonding electrons. As a test, an extra isotropic C atom was introduced close to the axis. Its occupancy was subsequently refined to 0.17 (equivalent to one electron), and the R-factor fell from 0.0233 to 0.0180. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901501021X/wm5154sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901501021X/wm5154Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901501021X/wm5154Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1403356 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H14N2O4Se22+·2(Cl)F(000) = 396
Mr = 407.02Dx = 1.925 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 18.8045 (16) ÅCell parameters from 9938 reflections
b = 5.2529 (4) Åθ = 2.2–40.2°
c = 7.2719 (6) ŵ = 5.65 mm1
β = 102.219 (1)°T = 100 K
V = 702.03 (10) Å3Needle, colourless
Z = 20.85 × 0.08 × 0.07 mm
Bruker D8 Advance single-crystal CCD diffractometer4209 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube4080 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.024
Detector resolution: 8.3 pixels mm-1θmax = 40.2°, θmin = 2.2°
Sets of exposures each taken over 0.5° ω rotation scansh = −34→34
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.514, Tmax = 1.000l = −13→13
11089 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.023w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0169P)2 + 0.004P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.062(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.10Δρmax = 4.55 e Å3
4209 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.87 e Å3
78 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 1708 quotients (Parsons et al., 2013)
3 restraintsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.044 (4)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Se10.50147 (2)0.56610 (5)0.16037 (2)0.01306 (4)
Cl10.65288 (2)0.16979 (8)0.87546 (6)0.01345 (7)
O10.69775 (8)0.3451 (3)0.4104 (2)0.0158 (2)
O20.62968 (9)0.5697 (5)0.57259 (19)0.0225 (3)
H40.6356 (18)0.454 (12)0.644 (6)0.058 (15)*
N10.67823 (8)0.6777 (3)0.1266 (2)0.0125 (2)
H10.66810.80280.03840.019*
H20.65630.53050.07870.019*
H30.72720.65360.15910.019*
C10.66257 (8)0.5306 (3)0.4320 (2)0.0125 (3)
C20.65058 (9)0.7531 (3)0.2961 (2)0.0114 (2)
H210.68080.89880.35740.014*
C30.57160 (9)0.8414 (3)0.2457 (3)0.0123 (2)
H310.56670.97130.14510.015*
H320.55920.92380.35730.015*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Se10.00843 (6)0.01357 (7)0.01686 (7)−0.00112 (6)0.00199 (4)0.00422 (7)
Cl10.01334 (15)0.01271 (15)0.01538 (15)0.00216 (12)0.00550 (12)0.00565 (12)
O10.0175 (6)0.0106 (5)0.0193 (6)0.0028 (4)0.0037 (5)0.0040 (4)
O20.0349 (7)0.0201 (6)0.0146 (5)0.0104 (8)0.0100 (5)0.0067 (7)
N10.0104 (5)0.0118 (5)0.0159 (5)0.0005 (4)0.0045 (4)0.0045 (5)
C10.0125 (5)0.0113 (7)0.0126 (6)0.0005 (4)0.0000 (4)0.0034 (4)
C20.0114 (6)0.0083 (5)0.0138 (6)0.0003 (5)0.0011 (5)0.0021 (5)
C30.0125 (6)0.0096 (5)0.0147 (6)0.0022 (5)0.0029 (5)0.0019 (5)
Se1—C31.9671 (18)N1—H20.9100
Se1—Se1i2.3213 (4)N1—H30.9100
O1—C11.206 (2)C1—C21.516 (2)
O2—C11.319 (2)C2—C31.525 (2)
O2—H40.79 (6)C2—H211.0000
N1—C21.490 (2)C3—H310.9900
N1—H10.9100C3—H320.9900
C3—Se1—Se1i100.88 (5)N1—C2—C3112.00 (14)
C1—O2—H4112 (4)C1—C2—C3113.22 (14)
C2—N1—H1109.5N1—C2—H21107.9
C2—N1—H2109.5C1—C2—H21107.9
H1—N1—H2109.5C3—C2—H21107.9
C2—N1—H3109.5C2—C3—Se1113.96 (12)
H1—N1—H3109.5C2—C3—H31108.8
H2—N1—H3109.5Se1—C3—H31108.8
O1—C1—O2125.92 (18)C2—C3—H32108.8
O1—C1—C2123.24 (17)Se1—C3—H32108.8
O2—C1—C2110.84 (16)H31—C3—H32107.7
N1—C2—C1107.72 (14)
O1—C1—C2—N19.3 (2)N1—C2—C3—Se170.66 (16)
O2—C1—C2—N1−170.64 (15)C1—C2—C3—Se1−51.39 (17)
O1—C1—C2—C3133.72 (17)C2—C3—Se1—Se1i−88.72 (12)
O2—C1—C2—C3−46.24 (19)C3—Se1—Se1i—C3i−83.05 (10)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···Cl1ii0.912.253.1425 (16)167
N1—H2···Cl1iii0.912.403.2110 (18)149
N1—H3···Cl1iv0.912.323.1794 (15)157
O2—H4···Cl10.79 (6)2.22 (6)3.0080 (19)172 (4)
C2—H21···O1v1.002.393.292 (2)150
C2—H21···O1iv1.002.553.216 (2)124
  6 in total

1.  The Cambridge Structural Database in retrospect and prospect.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Frank H Allen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 2.  Which form is that? The importance of selenium speciation and metabolism in the prevention and treatment of disease.

Authors:  Claire M Weekley; Hugh H Harris
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Characterization of mammalian selenoproteomes.

Authors:  Gregory V Kryukov; Sergi Castellano; Sergey V Novoselov; Alexey V Lobanov; Omid Zehtab; Roderic Guigó; Vadim N Gladyshev
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement.

Authors:  Simon Parsons; Howard D Flack; Trixie Wagner
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2013-05-17
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Crystal structures of 4,4'-(disulfane-1,2-diyl)bis(5-methyl-2H-1,3-dithiol-2-one) and 4,4'-(diselanane-1,2-diyl)bis(5-methyl-2H-1,3-dithiol-2-one).

Authors:  Ivan Trentin; Claudia Schindler; Carola Schulzke
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2018-05-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.