Literature DB >> 26089143

Critical histologic appraisal of the pseudocapsule of small renal tumors.

Lu Wang1, Jingyang Feng, Helyn Alvarez, Connor Snarskis, Gopal Gupta, Maria M Picken.   

Abstract

Small renal tumors are usually enwrapped in a pseudocapsule with well-confined borders, a feature that facilitates the performance of nephron-sparing surgeries (NSS). Our study was designed to evaluate the histologic features of the pseudocapsule of small renal tumors. One hundred seventy-eight renal tumors (≤4 cm), which were surgically removed by total nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, or enucleation procedures during 2002-2013, were re-examined microscopically. Special attention was paid to the completeness and thickness of the pseudocapsule as well as the extra-pseudocapsular extension (EPE); components of the pseudocapsule and the intra-pseudocapsular vasculature (size/number) were evaluated. The data were analyzed according to the histological tumor types, Fuhrman grades, and sizes. Student's t test and chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. Among 178 renal tumors, clear cell renal carcinomas (RCC) showed the thickest pseudocapsule (average 0.23 mm), while oncocytoma showed the thinnest (average thickness of 0.09 mm). Chromophobe RCC had the highest rate of EPE and the highest percentage of tumors with larger (≥0.2 mm) intra-pseudocapsular arteries. The EPE rate was also related to the nuclear grade (p = 0.001). Muscular differentiation, reticulin, and collagen components were present in the fibrous stroma of the pseudocapsule. Our study suggests that clear cell RCC has the thickest pseudocapsule while oncocytoma has a poorly developed pseudocapsule, but shows the least infiltrative pattern. In small RCC (≤4.0 cm), the EPE rate is related to tumor grade but not to tumor size. Larger arterioles (≥0.2 mm) are encountered infrequently within the tumor pseudocapsule, with the highest percentage being found in chromophobe RCC and the lowest in papillary RCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26089143     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-015-1797-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  29 in total

1.  Nephron-sparing surgery: current developments and controversies.

Authors:  Marco Carini; Andrea Minervini; Sergio Serni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  The capsule of the renal cell carcinoma (clear cell phenotype) contains modified smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  W De Riese; E Reale
Journal:  J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol       Date:  1991-04

3.  Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Elias A Castilla; Louis S Liou; Neil A Abrahams; Amr Fergany; Lisa A Rybicki; Jonathan Myles; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Simple enucleation for the treatment of PT1a renal cell carcinoma: our 20-year experience.

Authors:  Marco Carini; Andrea Minervini; Lorenzo Masieri; Alberto Lapini; Sergio Serni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma: Long-term survival data of 216 patients.

Authors:  F Becker; S Siemer; U Humke; M Hack; M Ziegler; M Stöckle
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Changing concepts in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  John S Lam; Oleg Shvarts; Allan J Pantuck
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Characterization of smooth muscle components in renal angiomyolipomas: Histological and immunohistochemical comparison with renal capsular leiomyomas.

Authors:  Takashi Nikaido; Masataka Nakano; Miyuki Kato; Masafumi Suzuki; Hiroshi Ishikura; Shigeo Aizawa
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.534

8.  Nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in the treatment of intracapsular renal cell carcinoma up to 7cm.

Authors:  Alessandro Antonelli; Alberto Cozzoli; Maria Nicolai; Danilo Zani; Tiziano Zanotelli; Laura Perucchini; Sergio Cosciani Cunico; Claudio Simeone
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Bradley C Leibovich; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prospective analysis of multifocality in renal cell carcinoma: influence of histological pattern, grade, number, size, volume and deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy.

Authors:  B A Kletscher; J Qian; D G Bostwick; P E Andrews; H Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Margins in Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Dean D Laganosky; Christopher P Filson; Viraj A Master
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to identify pseudocapsule invasion in renal tumors.

Authors:  Rocco Papalia; Valeria Panebianco; Riccardo Mastroianni; Maurizio Del Monte; Emanuela Altobelli; Eliodoro Faiella; Francesco Rosario Grasso; Mariangela Bellangino; Giuseppe Simone; Massimo Ciccozzi; Silvia Angeletti; Giulia D'ovidio; Carlo Catalano; Michele Gallucci; Roberto Mario Scarpa; Giovanni Muto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Tumor enucleation specimens of small renal tumors more frequently have a positive surgical margin than partial nephrectomy specimens, but this is not associated with local tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Ian Hughes; Connor Snarskis; Helyn Alvarez; Jingyang Feng; Gopal N Gupta; Maria M Picken
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Postoperative recurrence of adult renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Ning Liu; Weidong Gan; Xiaogong Li; Gutian Zhang; Dongmei Li; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Localized chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: preoperative imaging judgment and laparoscopic simple enucleation for treatment.

Authors:  Wenbiao Ren; Bichen Xue; Jiandong Qu; Longfei Liu; Chao Li; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  MRI as a tool to assess surgical margins and pseudocapsule features directly following partial nephrectomy for small renal masses.

Authors:  Tim J van Oostenbrugge; Willemien Runneboom; Elise Bekers; Jan Heidkamp; Johan F Langenhuijsen; Andor Veltien; Arie Maat; Peter F A Mulders; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.