Literature DB >> 16359779

Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma: Long-term survival data of 216 patients.

F Becker1, S Siemer, U Humke, M Hack, M Ziegler, M Stöckle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our experiences with elective nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in a consecutive series of 216 patients are presented. Clinicopathological features and long-term oncological outcome is compared to patients treated with radical nephrectomy (RN).
METHODS: Between 1975 and 2002, NSS was performed in 488 patients; 311 of these patients had elective indications. Renal cell carcinoma was found in 241/311 patients (77.5%). Long-term follow up data could be obtained in 216/311 patients. Cancer-specific survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox's regression analysis and log-rank tests were used to evaluate independent predictive values of different clinicopathological features. Survival data of the 216 patients after NSS surgery were compared to 369 patients with small RCC treated with RN.
RESULTS: After a mean follow up of 66 months (median 64 months) 29 (13.4%) of 216 patients treated with NSS had died, 4 of them (1.8%) tumour-related. Tumour recurrence was detected in 12 patients (5.6%). 204 patients (94.4%) were free of tumour at last follow-up. Cancer specific survival rates at 5 and 10 years for patients treated with NSS (RN) were 97.8% (95.5%) and 95.8% (84.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Elective NSS surgery provides optimal long-term outcome in patients with small localized RCC. Compared to RN, renal parenchyma is preserved without any disadvantage in survival rates. Consequently elective NSS should be accepted as gold standard for small renal tumours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16359779     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  46 in total

1.  Canadian guidelines for the management of small renal masses (SRM).

Authors:  Michael A S Jewett; Ricardo Rendon; Louis Lacombe; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Simon Tanguay; Wassim Kassouf; Mike Leveridge; Ilias Cagiannos; Anil Kapoor; Stephen Pautler; Darrel Drachtenberg; Ronald Moore; Martin Gleave; Andrew Evans; Massoom Haider; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  [Renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  A Haferkamp; D Rohde; S C Müller; H Rübben; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Nephrectomy, donor nephrectomy, and partial kidney resection: indications for robot-assisted renal surgery].

Authors:  J Hubert; S Siemer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  [Nephron-sparing surgery].

Authors:  F Becker; S Siemer; J Rotering; H Suttmann; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Clinical utility gene card for: von Hippel-Lindau (VHL).

Authors:  Jochen Decker; Christine Neuhaus; Fiona Macdonald; Hiltrud Brauch; Eamonn R Maher
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.246

6. 

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Important aspects of organ-preserving surgery for renal tumors: indications, new standards, and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Frank Becker; Stefan Siemer; Jörn Kamradt; Ulrike Zwergel; Michael Stöckle
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Contemporary use of nephron-sparing surgery for children with malignant renal tumors at freestanding children's hospitals.

Authors:  Jonathan C Routh; Dionne A Graham; Carlos R Estrada; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  The Effect of the Diffusion of the Surgical Robot on the Hospital-level Utilization of Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Ganesh Sivarajan; Glen B Taksler; Dawn Walter; Cary P Gross; Raul E Sosa; Danil V Makarov
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Differences in peritumoral pseudocapsule characteristics according to clinicopathological factors in clinical T1a renal tumors.

Authors:  Myong Kim; Woo Suk Choi; Chang Wook Jeong; Ja Hyeon Ku; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Kyung Chul Moon; Cheol Kwak
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.