Literature DB >> 26085919

Individual Differences in Eye-Movements During Reading: Working Memory and Speed-of-Processing Effects.

Matthew J Traxler1, Debra L Long1, Kristen M Tooley1, Clinton L Johns1, Megan Zirnstein1, Eunike Jonathan1.   

Abstract

Theories of eye-movement control in reading should ultimately describe how differences in knowledge and cognitive abilities affect reading and comprehension. Current mathematical models of eye-movement control do not yet incorporate individual differences as a source of variation in reading, although developmental and group-difference effects have been studied. These models nonetheless provide an excellent foundation for describing and explaining how and why patterns of eye-movements differ across readers (e.g., Rayner, Chace, & Ashby, 2006). Our focus in this article is on two aspects of individual variation: global processing speed (e.g., Salthouse, 1996) and working-memory capacity (e.g., Just & Carpenter, 1992). Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2001), we tested the extent to which overall reading speed and working-memory capacity moderate the degree to which syntactic and semantic information affect fixation times. Previous published data (Traxler et al., 2005) showed that working memory capacity and syntactic complexity interacted to determine fixation times in an eye-movement monitoring experiment. In a new set of models based on this same data set, we found that working-memory capacity interacted with sentence-characteristic variables only when processing speed was not included in the model. We interpret these findings with respect to current accounts of sentence processing and suggest how they might be incorporated into eye-movement control models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye-movements; individual differences; reading; working memory

Year:  2012        PMID: 26085919      PMCID: PMC4467465     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  17 in total

Review 1.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996).

Authors:  Maryellen C MacDonald; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Keith Rayner; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-08

6.  The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Erik D Reichle; Michael J Stroud; Carrick C Williams; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-09

Review 7.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  E D Reichle; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The acquisition of parafoveal word information in reading.

Authors:  H E Blanchard; A Pollatsek; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-07

10.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02
View more
  10 in total

1.  Bilingual deaf readers' use of semantic and syntactic cues in the processing of English relative clauses.

Authors:  Pilar Piñar; Matthew T Carlson; Jill P Morford; Paola E Dussias
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2016-06-29

2.  Robust effects of working memory demand during naturalistic language comprehension in language-selective cortex.

Authors:  Cory Shain; Idan A Blank; Evelina Fedorenko; Edward Gibson; William Schuler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Bilinguals on the garden-path: Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Liv J Hoversten; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2021-04-08

4.  Using measures of reading time regularity (RTR) to quantify eye movement dynamics, and how they are shaped by linguistic information.

Authors:  Monika Tschense; Sebastian Wallot
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  Deaf readers' response to syntactic complexity: evidence from self-paced reading.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler; David P Corina; Jill P Morford; Sarah Hafer; Liv J Hoversten
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-01

6.  The Random Forests statistical technique: An examination of its value for the study of reading.

Authors:  Kazunaga Matsuki; Victor Kuperman; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2016-01-05

7.  Are individual differences in reading speed related to extrafoveal visual acuity and crowding?

Authors:  Romy Frömer; Olaf Dimigen; Florian Niefind; Niels Krause; Reinhold Kliegl; Werner Sommer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution.

Authors:  Bruno Nicenboim; Shravan Vasishth; Carolina Gattei; Mariano Sigman; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-23

9.  When High-Capacity Readers Slow Down and Low-Capacity Readers Speed Up: Working Memory and Locality Effects.

Authors:  Bruno Nicenboim; Pavel Logačev; Carolina Gattei; Shravan Vasishth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-08

10.  Poor readers' retrieval mechanism: efficient access is not dependent on reading skill.

Authors:  Clinton L Johns; Kazunaga Matsuki; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.