Literature DB >> 26083759

A modular approach to intensity-modulated arc therapy optimization with noncoplanar trajectories.

Dávid Papp1, Thomas Bortfeld, Jan Unkelbach.   

Abstract

Utilizing noncoplanar beam angles in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has the potential to combine the benefits of arc therapy, such as short treatment times, with the benefits of noncoplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans, such as improved organ sparing. Recently, vendors introduced treatment machines that allow for simultaneous couch and gantry motion during beam delivery to make noncoplanar VMAT treatments possible. Our aim is to provide a reliable optimization method for noncoplanar isocentric arc therapy plan optimization. The proposed solution is modular in the sense that it can incorporate different existing beam angle selection and coplanar arc therapy optimization methods. Treatment planning is performed in three steps. First, a number of promising noncoplanar beam directions are selected using an iterative beam selection heuristic; these beams serve as anchor points of the arc therapy trajectory. In the second step, continuous gantry/couch angle trajectories are optimized using a simple combinatorial optimization model to define a beam trajectory that efficiently visits each of the anchor points. Treatment time is controlled by limiting the time the beam needs to trace the prescribed trajectory. In the third and final step, an optimal arc therapy plan is found along the prescribed beam trajectory. In principle any existing arc therapy optimization method could be incorporated into this step; for this work we use a sliding window VMAT algorithm. The approach is demonstrated using two particularly challenging cases. The first one is a lung SBRT patient whose planning goals could not be satisfied with fewer than nine noncoplanar IMRT fields when the patient was treated in the clinic. The second one is a brain tumor patient, where the target volume overlaps with the optic nerves and the chiasm and it is directly adjacent to the brainstem. Both cases illustrate that the large number of angles utilized by isocentric noncoplanar VMAT plans can help improve dose conformity, homogeneity, and organ sparing simultaneously using the same beam trajectory length and delivery time as a coplanar VMAT plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26083759     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/13/5179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  Dosimetric accuracy of dynamic couch rotation during volumetric modulated arc therapy (DCR-VMAT) for primary brain tumours.

Authors:  Gregory Smyth; Philip M Evans; Jeffrey C Bamber; Henry C Mandeville; A Rollo Moore; Liam C Welsh; Frank H Saran; James L Bedford
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Cleaning the dose falloff in lung SBRT plan.

Authors:  Dharmin Desai; Ganesh Narayanasamy; Milan Bimali; Ivan Cordrey; Hisham Elasmar; Senthamizhchelvan Srinivasan; Ellis Lee Johnson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  A novel optimization framework for VMAT with dynamic gantry couch rotation.

Authors:  Qihui Lyu; Victoria Y Yu; Dan Ruan; Ryan Neph; Daniel O'Connor; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Comparison of non-coplanar optimization of static beams and arc trajectories for intensity-modulated treatments of meningioma cases.

Authors:  Tiago Ventura; Humberto Rocha; Brigida da Costa Ferreira; Joana Dias; Maria do Carmo Lopes
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-07

5.  Organ-at-risk sparing with dynamic trajectory radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: comparison with volumetric arc therapy on a publicly available library of cases.

Authors:  Jenny Bertholet; Paul-Henry Mackeprang; Silvan Mueller; Gian Guyer; Hannes A Loebner; Yanick Wyss; Daniel Frei; Werner Volken; Olgun Elicin; Daniel M Aebersold; Michael K Fix; Peter Manser
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.309

6.  Microstructural Injury to Corpus Callosum and Intrahemispheric White Matter Tracts Correlate With Attention and Processing Speed Decline After Brain Radiation.

Authors:  Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Michelle D Tibbs; Roshan Karunamuni; Mia Salans; Kathryn R Tringale; Anthony Yip; Michael Connor; Aaron B Simon; Lucas K Vitzthum; Anny Reyes; Anna Christina Macari; Vitali Moiseenko; Carrie R McDonald; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 8.013

7.  Viability of Non-Coplanar VMAT for Liver SBRT as Compared to Coplanar VMAT and Beam Orientation Optimized 4π IMRT.

Authors:  Kaley Woods; Dan Nguyen; Angelia Tran; Victoria Y Yu; Minsong Cao; Tianye Niu; Percy Lee; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 8.  Recent developments in non-coplanar radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gregory Smyth; Philip M Evans; Jeffrey C Bamber; James L Bedford
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Fast stereotactic radiosurgery planning using patient-specific beam angle optimization and automation.

Authors:  Thomas D Mann; Kundan S Thind; Nicolas P Ploquin
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-26

10.  Initial characterization, dosimetric benchmark and performance validation of Dynamic Wave Arc.

Authors:  Manuela Burghelea; Dirk Verellen; Kenneth Poels; Cecilia Hung; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Jennifer Dhont; Thierry Gevaert; Robbe Van den Begin; Christine Collen; Yukinori Matsuo; Takahiro Kishi; Viorica Simon; Masahiro Hiraoka; Mark de Ridder
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.