Literature DB >> 26083659

Evaluation of a cone beam computed tomography geometry for image guided small animal irradiation.

Yidong Yang1, Michael Armour, Ken Kang-Hsin Wang, Nishant Gandhi, Iulian Iordachita, Jeffrey Siewerdsen, John Wong.   

Abstract

The conventional imaging geometry for small animal cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is that a detector panel rotates around the head-to-tail axis of an imaged animal ('tubular' geometry). Another unusual but possible imaging geometry is that the detector panel rotates around the anterior-to-posterior axis of the animal ('pancake' geometry). The small animal radiation research platform developed at Johns Hopkins University employs the pancake geometry where a prone-positioned animal is rotated horizontally between an x-ray source and detector panel. This study is to assess the CBCT image quality in the pancake geometry and investigate potential methods for improvement. We compared CBCT images acquired in the pancake geometry with those acquired in the tubular geometry when the phantom/animal was placed upright simulating the conventional CBCT geometry. Results showed signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in the pancake geometry were reduced in comparison to the tubular geometry at the same dose level. But the overall spatial resolution within the transverse plane of the imaged cylinder/animal was better in the pancake geometry. A modest exposure increase to two folds in the pancake geometry can improve image quality to a level close to the tubular geometry. Image quality can also be improved by inclining the animal, which reduces streak artifacts caused by bony structures. The major factor resulting in the inferior image quality in the pancake geometry is the elevated beam attenuation along the long axis of the phantom/animal and consequently increased scatter-to-primary ratio in that orientation. Not withstanding, the image quality in the pancake-geometry CBCT is adequate to support image guided animal positioning, while providing unique advantages of non-coplanar and multiple mice irradiation. This study also provides useful knowledge about the image quality in the two very different imaging geometries, i.e. pancake and tubular geometry, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26083659      PMCID: PMC4526144          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/13/5163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  21 in total

1.  Quantitative observations on recovery from whole body irradiation in mice. II. Recovery during and after daily irradiation.

Authors:  R H MOLE
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1957-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

3.  Design and evaluation of a variable aperture collimator for conformal radiotherapy of small animals using a microCT scanner.

Authors:  Edward E Graves; Hu Zhou; Raja Chatterjee; Paul J Keall; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Christopher H Contag; Arthur L Boyer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Sertraline slows disease progression and increases neurogenesis in N171-82Q mouse model of Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Wenzhen Duan; Qi Peng; Naoki Masuda; Eric Ford; Erik Tryggestad; Bruce Ladenheim; Ming Zhao; Jean Lud Cadet; John Wong; Christopher A Ross
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 5.996

5.  Image-guided small animal radiation research platform: calibration of treatment beam alignment.

Authors:  Mohammad Matinfar; Eric Ford; Iulian Iordachita; John Wong; Peter Kazanzides
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A histology-based atlas of the C57BL/6J mouse brain deformably registered to in vivo MRI for localized radiation and surgical targeting.

Authors:  David Purger; Todd McNutt; Pragathi Achanta; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; John Wong; Eric Ford
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A comprehensive system for dosimetric commissioning and Monte Carlo validation for the small animal radiation research platform.

Authors:  E Tryggestad; M Armour; I Iordachita; F Verhaegen; J W Wong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  CT guidance is needed to achieve reproducible positioning of the mouse head for repeat precision cranial irradiation.

Authors:  M Armour; E Ford; I Iordachita; J Wong
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  High-resolution, small animal radiation research platform with x-ray tomographic guidance capabilities.

Authors:  John Wong; Elwood Armour; Peter Kazanzides; Iulian Iordachita; Erik Tryggestad; Hua Deng; Mohammad Matinfar; Christopher Kennedy; Zejian Liu; Timothy Chan; Owen Gray; Frank Verhaegen; Todd McNutt; Eric Ford; Theodore L DeWeese
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  A novel technique for image-guided local heart irradiation in the rat.

Authors:  Sunil Sharma; Eduardo G Moros; Marjan Boerma; Vijayalakshmi Sridharan; Eun Young Han; Richard Clarkson; Martin Hauer-Jensen; Peter M Corry
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-31
View more
  4 in total

1.  Quality Assessment of Stereotactic Radiosurgery of a Melanoma Brain Metastases Model Using a Mouselike Phantom and the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform.

Authors:  Cheng-Chia Wu; Kunal R Chaudhary; Yong Hum Na; David Welch; Paul J Black; Adam M Sonabend; Peter Canoll; Yvonne M Saenger; Tony J C Wang; Cheng-Shie Wuu; Tom K Hei; Simon K Cheng
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Virtual monoenergetic micro-CT imaging in mice with artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Brent van der Heyden; Stijn Roden; Rüveyda Dok; Sandra Nuyts; Edmond Sterpin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  An image guided small animal stereotactic radiotherapy system.

Authors:  Hao Sha; Thirupandiyur S Udayakumar; Perry B Johnson; Nesrin Dogan; Alan Pollack; Yidong Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-05

Review 4.  Dosimetry in Micro-computed Tomography: a Review of the Measurement Methods, Impacts, and Characterization of the Quantum GX Imaging System.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Meganck; Bob Liu
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.488

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.