Literature DB >> 26081807

Unexpected radiographic lucency following grafting of bone defects with calcium sulfate/tricalcium phosphate bone substitute.

Darryl A Auston1, Matthew Feibert, Tina Craig, Timothy A Damron.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the development of unexpected radiographic lucency (URL) corresponding to the use of a commercially available calcium sulfate/tricalcium phosphate composite used to treat benign osseous lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective comparative study of patients with and without URL after treatment with curettage and grafting with calcium sulfate/tricalcium phosphate. The charts of 87 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed for demographic, clinical, and radiographic data. The group with URL was compared to those with more typical patterns of graft incorporation.
RESULTS: Thirteen of 87 cases (15%) showed URL. There was no difference with respect to the pathologic subtype, anatomic location, or specific bone for the presence of URL. Of patients with URL, one (7.7%) required reoperation and regrafting, whereas among patients without URL, five (6.7%) had clinical complications, with one requiring reoperation and regrafting, and one requiring radiofrequency ablation.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients treated with calcium sulfate/tricalcium phosphate cementing after curettage of low-grade bone lesions go on to uneventful healing in our series. In a minority of patients, URL occurs in lieu of the more typical pattern of centripetal incorporation. However, there is no increase in complications associated with URL. Based on these findings, patients should be informed of the possibility of this risk, although there appears to be little risk of clinically relevant adverse consequences. Physicians should be aware of this complication in order to avoid mistaking it for recurrence of the primary lesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26081807     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-015-2189-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  25 in total

Review 1.  Calcium sulfate- and calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes. Mimicry of the mineral phase of bone.

Authors:  B K Tay; V V Patel; D S Bradford
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Effectiveness of ultraporous β-tricalcium phosphate (vitoss) as bone graft substitute for cavitary defects in benign and low-grade malignant bone tumors.

Authors:  Corey Van Hoff; Julie Balch Samora; Michael J Griesser; Martha K Crist; Thomas J Scharschmidt; Joel L Mayerson
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2012-01

3.  Autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Complications and functional assessment.

Authors:  J A Goulet; L E Senunas; G L DeSilva; M L Greenfield
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Calcium sulfates: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Murray J S Beuerlein; Michael D McKee
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Complications of posterior iliac crest bone grafting in spine surgery in children.

Authors:  D L Skaggs; M A Samuelson; J M Hale; R M Kay; V T Tolo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The use of calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic in bone tumour surgery.

Authors:  A Uchida; N Araki; Y Shinto; H Yoshikawa; E Kurisaki; K Ono
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-03

7.  Multicenter trial of Collagraft as bone graft substitute.

Authors:  C N Cornell; J M Lane; M Chapman; R Merkow; D Seligson; S Henry; R Gustilo; K Vincent
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Use of a calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate synthetic bone graft composite in the surgical management of primary bone tumors.

Authors:  Nathan Evaniew; Victoria Tan; Naveen Parasu; Erik Jurriaans; Karen Finlay; Benjamin Deheshi; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Fracture at the iliac bone graft harvest site after fusion of the spine.

Authors:  R W Hu; H H Bohlman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus. An estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).

Authors:  B E Buck; T I Malinin; M D Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Transforming the Degradation Rate of β-tricalcium Phosphate Bone Replacement Using 3-Dimensional Printing.

Authors:  Chen Shen; Maxime M Wang; Lukasz Witek; Nick Tovar; Bruce N Cronstein; Andrea Torroni; Roberto L Flores; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Early postoperative compilations of bone filling in curettage defects.

Authors:  Clark J Chen; Earl W Brien
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Progressive Osteolysis After Use of Synthetic Bone Graft Substitute.

Authors:  Punnavit Harimtepathip; Lamar F Callaway; Margaret A Sinkler; Suash Sharma; Kelly C Homlar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-29

4.  Application of osteoinductive calcium phosphate ceramics in giant cell tumor of the sacrum: report of six cases.

Authors:  Yitian Wang; Xiangfeng Li; Yi Luo; Li Zhang; Hezhong Chen; Li Min; Qing Chang; Yong Zhou; Chongqi Tu; Xiangdong Zhu; Xingdong Zhang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2022-04-11

5.  Sinus Tract Formation with Chronic Inflammatory Cystic Mass after Beta Tricalcium Phosphate Insertion.

Authors:  Hong Jin Kim; Woong Gyu Na; Sung Won Jung; Sung Hoon Koh; Hyoseob Lim
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-12-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.