Literature DB >> 23380017

Use of a calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate synthetic bone graft composite in the surgical management of primary bone tumors.

Nathan Evaniew1, Victoria Tan, Naveen Parasu, Erik Jurriaans, Karen Finlay, Benjamin Deheshi, Michelle Ghert.   

Abstract

Benign primary bone tumors are commonly treated with intralesional curettage with or without the use of surgical adjuvants. The reconstructive approach to the resulting contained bone defects is controversial, and clinical practice is varied. Synthetic bone substitutes may provide early mechanical support while minimizing the risks of disease transmission, nonunion, infection, and donor-site morbidity. Limited data exists regarding the use of calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate composite bone substitute for this purpose. The authors retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of 24 patients with benign primary bone tumors who underwent intralesional curettage followed by reconstruction with a calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate composite bone substitute. Mean follow-up was 23 months. The most common diagnosis was giant cell tumor of bone. Six patients had upper-extremity tumors and 18 had lower-extremity tumors. Mean preoperative radiographic tumor volume was 41.0 cm(3). Mean volume of PRO-DENSE (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, Tennessee) used in each patient was 15.6 cm(3). Mean time to full weight bearing for all patients was 7.3 weeks. Two patients sustained local tumor recurrences. No postoperative fractures occurred, and no complications occurred related to the use of the calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate composite. One case of deep infection occurred secondary to wound breakdown. The use of a calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate composite was associated with rapid biological integration and an early return to activities of daily living, with no composite-related complications. This technique is a viable option in the reconstruction of cavitary bone defects following intralesional curettage of primary benign bone tumors. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23380017     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130122-25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  25 in total

1.  Osteoinduction and -conduction through absorbable bone substitute materials based on calcium sulfate: in vivo biological behavior in a rabbit model.

Authors:  D Pförringer; N Harrasser; H Mühlhofer; M Kiokekli; A Stemberger; M van Griensven; M Lucke; R Burgkart; A Obermeier
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Unexpected radiographic lucency following grafting of bone defects with calcium sulfate/tricalcium phosphate bone substitute.

Authors:  Darryl A Auston; Matthew Feibert; Tina Craig; Timothy A Damron
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The kinetics of remodeling of a calcium sulfate/calcium phosphate bioceramic.

Authors:  Roberto Civinini; Antonio Capone; Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Lorenzo Nistri; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Adverse reactions of artificial bone graft substitutes: lessons learned from using tricalcium phosphate geneX®.

Authors:  Joerg Friesenbichler; Werner Maurer-Ertl; Patrick Sadoghi; Ulrike Pirker-Fruehauf; Koppany Bodo; Andreas Leithner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Evaluation and Management of Subchondral Calcium Phosphate Injection Technique to Treat Bone Marrow Lesion.

Authors:  Diego Costa Astur; Eduardo Vasconcelos de Freitas; Pedro Barreira Cabral; Caio Carvalho Morais; Bruno Silveira Pavei; Camila Cohen Kaleka; Pedro Debieux; Moises Cohen
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Antibiotic-loaded calcium carbonate/calcium sulfate granules as co-adjuvant for bone grafting.

Authors:  Débora C Coraça-Huber; Alexander Wurm; Manfred Fille; Johann Hausdorfer; Michael Nogler; S Vogt; Klaus-Dieter Kühn
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Calcium sulfate as bone graft substitute in the treatment of osseous bone defects, a prospective study.

Authors:  Yashavantha Kumar C; Nalini K B; Jagdish Menon; Dilip Kumar Patro; Banerji B H
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

8.  Compressive fatigue and fracture toughness behavior of injectable, settable bone cements.

Authors:  Andrew J Harmata; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Scott A Guelcher; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-08-01

Review 9.  Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments.

Authors:  Rusin Zhao; Ruijia Yang; Paul R Cooper; Zohaib Khurshid; Amin Shavandi; Jithendra Ratnayake
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Complete twelve month bone remodeling with a bi-phasic injectable bone substitute in benign bone tumors: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Jacek Kaczmarczyk; Piotr Sowinski; Maciej Goch; Katarzyna Katulska
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.