Literature DB >> 26080931

Expression noise facilitates the evolution of gene regulation.

Luise Wolf1, Olin K Silander1, Erik van Nimwegen1.   

Abstract

Although it is often tacitly assumed that gene regulatory interactions are finely tuned, how accurate gene regulation could evolve from a state without regulation is unclear. Moreover, gene expression noise would seem to impede the evolution of accurate gene regulation, and previous investigations have provided circumstantial evidence that natural selection has acted to lower noise levels. By evolving synthetic Escherichia coli promoters de novo, we here show that, contrary to expectations, promoters exhibit low noise by default. Instead, selection must have acted to increase the noise levels of highly regulated E. coli promoters. We present a general theory of the interplay between gene expression noise and gene regulation that explains these observations. The theory shows that propagation of expression noise from regulators to their targets is not an unwanted side-effect of regulation, but rather acts as a rudimentary form of regulation that facilitates the evolution of more accurate regulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E. coli; computational biology; evolution; evolutionary biology; gene expression noise; gene regulation; genomics; synthetic biology; systems biology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26080931      PMCID: PMC4468965          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.05856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  38 in total

1.  Phenotypic consequences of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise.

Authors:  William J Blake; Gábor Balázsi; Michael A Kohanski; Farren J Isaacs; Kevin F Murphy; Yina Kuang; Charles R Cantor; David R Walt; James J Collins
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Phenotypic heterogeneity can enhance rare-cell survival in 'stress-sensitive' yeast populations.

Authors:  Amy L Bishop; Faiza A Rab; Edward R Sumner; Simon V Avery
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes.

Authors:  Itay Tirosh; Naama Barkai
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Genetic determinants and cellular constraints in noisy gene expression.

Authors:  Alvaro Sanchez; Ido Golding
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Coupling between noise and plasticity in E. coli.

Authors:  Gajinder Pal Singh
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Probing the effect of promoters on noise in gene expression using thousands of designed sequences.

Authors:  Eilon Sharon; David van Dijk; Yael Kalma; Leeat Keren; Ohad Manor; Zohar Yakhini; Eran Segal
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  ISMARA: automated modeling of genomic signals as a democracy of regulatory motifs.

Authors:  Piotr J Balwierz; Mikhail Pachkov; Phil Arnold; Andreas J Gruber; Mihaela Zavolan; Erik van Nimwegen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Promoter sequence determines the relationship between expression level and noise.

Authors:  Lucas B Carey; David van Dijk; Peter M A Sloot; Jaap A Kaandorp; Eran Segal
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Selection to minimise noise in living systems and its implications for the evolution of gene expression.

Authors:  Ben Lehner
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  Regulatory control and the costs and benefits of biochemical noise.

Authors:  Sorin Tănase-Nicola; Pieter Rein ten Wolde
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  29 in total

1.  Epistasis and destabilizing mutations shape gene expression variability in humans via distinct modes of action.

Authors:  Ence Yang; Gang Wang; Jizhou Yang; Beiyan Zhou; Yanan Tian; James J Cai
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  A Tool for Alignment and Averaging of Sparse Fluorescence Signals in Rod-Shaped Bacteria.

Authors:  Joris M H Goudsmits; Antoine M van Oijen; Andrew Robinson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  CRISPR Tools To Control Gene Expression in Bacteria.

Authors:  Antoine Vigouroux; David Bikard
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Fitness effects of altering gene expression noise in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Fabien Duveau; Andrea Hodgins-Davis; Brian Ph Metzger; Bing Yang; Stephen Tryban; Elizabeth A Walker; Tricia Lybrook; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Predicting bacterial promoter function and evolution from random sequences.

Authors:  Mato Lagator; Srdjan Sarikas; Calin C Guet; Gašper Tkačik; Magdalena Steinrueck; David Toledo-Aparicio; Jonathan P Bollback
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Searching for principles of microbial physiology.

Authors:  Frank J Bruggeman; Robert Planqué; Douwe Molenaar; Bas Teusink
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 7.  What's Luck Got to Do with It: Single Cells, Multiple Fates, and Biological Nondeterminism.

Authors:  Orsolya Symmons; Arjun Raj
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Post-Transcriptional Noise Control.

Authors:  Maike M K Hansen; Leor S Weinberger
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  Adaptive gene misregulation.

Authors:  Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Optimizing mitochondrial maintenance in extended neuronal projections.

Authors:  Anamika Agrawal; Elena F Koslover
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.