Literature DB >> 26080403

Mapping fast protein folding with multiple-site fluorescent probes.

Maxim B Prigozhin1, Shu-Han Chao2, Shahar Sukenik1, Taras V Pogorelov3, Martin Gruebele4.   

Abstract

Fast protein folding involves complex dynamics in many degrees of freedom, yet microsecond folding experiments provide only low-resolution structural information. We enhance the structural resolution of the five-helix bundle protein λ6-85 by engineering into it three fluorescent tryptophan-tyrosine contact probes. The probes report on distances between three different helix pairs: 1-2, 1-3, and 3-2. Temperature jump relaxation experiments on these three mutants reveal two different kinetic timescales: a slower timescale for 1-3 and a faster one for the two contacts involving helix 2. We hypothesize that these differences arise from a single folding mechanism that forms contacts on different timescales, and not from changes of mechanism due to adding the probes. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the corresponding three distances in one published single-trajectory all-atom molecular-dynamics simulation of a similar mutant. Autocorrelation analysis of the trajectory reveals the same "slow" and "fast" distance change as does experiment, but on a faster timescale; smoothing the trajectory in time shows that this ordering is robust and persists into the microsecond folding timescale. Structural investigation of the all-atom computational data suggests that helix 2 misfolds to produce a short-lived off-pathway trap, in agreement with the experimental finding that the 1-2 and 3-2 distances involving helix 2 contacts form a kinetic grouping distinct from 1 to 3. Our work demonstrates that comparison between experiment and simulation can be extended to several order parameters, providing a stronger mechanistic test.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fluorescence; helix bundle; molecular dynamics; protein folding; thermal denaturation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26080403      PMCID: PMC4491763          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422683112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  32 in total

1.  Origin of apparent fast and non-exponential kinetics of lysozyme folding measured in pulsed hydrogen exchange experiments.

Authors:  O Bieri; T Kiefhaber
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Long time dynamics of Met-enkephalin: comparison of explicit and implicit solvent models.

Authors:  Min-yi Shen My; Karl F Freed
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Detection-dependent kinetics as a probe of folding landscape microstructure.

Authors:  Wei Yuan Yang; Martin Gruebele
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  How fast-folding proteins fold.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Atomistic folding simulations of the five-helix bundle protein λ(6−85).

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Vincent A Voelz; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  The fast and the slow: folding and trapping of λ6-85.

Authors:  Maxim B Prigozhin; Martin Gruebele
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  Recent successes of the energy landscape theory of protein folding and function.

Authors:  P G Wolynes
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.318

8.  Differential ordering of the protein backbone and side chains during protein folding revealed by site-specific recombinant infrared probes.

Authors:  Sureshbabu Nagarajan; Humeyra Taskent-Sezgin; Dzmitry Parul; Isaac Carrico; Daniel P Raleigh; R Brian Dyer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Using two fluorescent probes to dissect the binding, insertion, and dimerization kinetics of a model membrane peptide.

Authors:  Jia Tang; Hang Yin; Jade Qiu; Matthew J Tucker; William F DeGrado; Feng Gai
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cooperative folding near the downhill limit determined with amino acid resolution by hydrogen exchange.

Authors:  Wookyung Yu; Michael C Baxa; Isabelle Gagnon; Karl F Freed; Tobin R Sosnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Meandering Down the Energy Landscape of Protein Folding: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Rachel M Abaskharon; Feng Gai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Fast pressure-jump all-atom simulations and experiments reveal site-specific protein dehydration-folding dynamics.

Authors:  Maxim B Prigozhin; Yi Zhang; Klaus Schulten; Martin Gruebele; Taras V Pogorelov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Advances in free-energy-based simulations of protein folding and ligand binding.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Joseph A Morrone; Carlos Simmerling; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  Threading single proteins through pores to compare their energy landscapes.

Authors:  Prabhat Tripathi; Arash Firouzbakht; Martin Gruebele; Meni Wanunu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  A quantitative connection of experimental and simulated folding landscapes by vibrational spectroscopy.

Authors:  Caitlin M Davis; Laura Zanetti-Polzi; Martin Gruebele; Andrea Amadei; R Brian Dyer; Isabella Daidone
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 9.825

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.