Literature DB >> 26079486

The Associations between RNA Splicing Complex Gene SF3A1 Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk in a Chinese Population.

Xiaohua Chen1, Hua Du2, Binjian Liu2, Li Zou3, Wei Chen3, Yang Yang3, Ying Zhu3, Yajie Gong3, Jianbo Tian3, Feng Li4, Shan Zhong5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aberrant alternative splicing included alterations in components of the mRNA splicing machinery often occurred in colon cancer. However, the role of SF3A1, one key component of the mRNA splicing machinery, on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk was still not elucidated. METHOD AND
FINDINGS: We performed a hospital-based case-control study containing 801 CRC patients and 817 cancer-free controls to examine the association between SF3A1 polymorphisms and CRC risk in a Chinese population. Four candidate SNPs (rs10376, rs5753073, rs2839998 and rs2074733) were selected based on bioinformatics analysis and previous findings. The results showed no significant associations between these SNPs and CRC risk (P > 0.05). Besides, the stratified analysis based on the smoking and alcohol use status obtained no statistically significant results.
CONCLUSION: Our study was the first one to investigate the association between SF3A1 polymorphisms and CRC risk. The results suggested these four SNPs in SF3A1 were not associated with CRC risk in a Chinese population, however, further more studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26079486      PMCID: PMC4469430          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major health problem and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, representing the third most common cause of cancer-related death[1]. It was estimated to cause 142,820 new cases and 50,830 deaths of the colon and rectum cancer in the United States for both men and women in 2013[2]. Although several environmental risk factors [3,4] have been detected to be associated with risk of CRC, genetic susceptibility was found to be involved in the development of this disease. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been successful applied in identifying susceptibility loci for cancer and other diseases [5,6]. In colorectal cancer, recent GWAS studies have revealed more than 20 susceptibility single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in multiple different loci in European and Asian populations [7-20]. However, most of them are located in non-coding regions and can explain less than 10% of the familial relative risk of CRC in European populations [13,14].These indicated that there may be a substantial fraction of genetic components undiscovered and the biological mechanisms are required to be explored. RNA splicing can remove introns from pre-messenger RNAs and is essential to all eukaryotic organisms to generate considerable numbers of alternative isoforms with altered coding potential or regulatory regions in order to guarantee the functional diversity of their protein in the face of a limited number of genes[21,22]. However, aberrant alternative splicing resulted from mutations within splicing elements in cancer genes or transcripts from non-mutated genes occurred in many cancers [23]. For example, a few studies have investigated the aberrant alternative splicing in colon cancer and detected many colon cancer specific alternative splicing events affecting several proteins or pathways[24-28]. These colon cancer-related splicing events often involved alterations in components of the mRNA splicing machinery, which was exemplified by the recent finding that amplification or overexpression of PRPF6 could be a driver of colon tumorigenesis[29]. RNA splicing is a well-ordered process that recruits, rearranges and disengages of a set of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) complexes, as well as many other protein components onto the pre-mRNAs. During splicing, SF3A1, together with the U2 snRNP and other proteins, are recruited to the 3’ splicing site to generate the splicing complex A after the recognition of the 3’ splicing site[30].Therefore, SF3A1 is critical for spliceosome assembly and normal splicing events. SF3A1 is located in 22q12.2, where has been reported to be associated with susceptibility of lung cancer [31], breast cancer [32] and inflammatory bowel disease [33] by genome-wide association studies. Several studies have reported the associations between mutations of SF3A1 and other diseases. Yoshida et al[30] have recently discovered lower mutational rates for SF3A1 in the majority of the patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Additionally, curated information from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database revealed that mutations in the coding-region of SF3A1 were associated with several cancers, including esophageal adenocarcinoma, myxoid liposarcomas, synovial sarcomas, osteosarcomas, endometrial tumors, lung cancer, breast cancer, ovarian carcinoma, gastric cancer and glioblastoma. Collectively, these findings suggested the link between SF3A1 and cancer risk, and emphasized a need of additional researches for the association of SF3A1 polymorphisms and CRC risk. Considering the common occurrence of aberrant alternative splicing in CRC and the role of SF3A1 in alternative splicing, we hypothesized the polymorphisms of SF3A1 might also contribute to the susceptibility of CRC. In the present study, we carried out a hospital-based case-control study in a Chinese population to investigate the association between polymorphisms of SF3A1 and CRC risk.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

At the recruitment, written informed consent was obtained from each subject. The personal information about sex, birth year, smoking and drinking habits of all participants were also collected by interviews. Meanwhile, 5ml peripheral blood sample from each subject was collected and stored in the -80°C refrigerator before DNA extraction. This study was approved by ethics committee of Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Study participants

A total of 801 CRC cases and 817 cancer-free controls were investigated in this study, all of whom were unrelated ethnic Han Chinese living in Wuhan region. Patients who had been histopathologically confirmed with primary colorectal cancer were enrolled from Tongji Hospital between 2009 and 2013, and had not received radiotherapy or chemotherapy before blood samples collection, part of which were described in our previous studies[34-36]. Cancer-free controls were selected from physical examination participants in the same hospital and during the same period without any history of cancer or seriously chronic disease. The control subjects were frequency matched to CRC patients by age (±5 years) and gender.

Identification of candidate SNPs

The candidate SNPs were identified based on bioinformatics analysis and related findings. The screening procedure was described as follows. First, we input the gene “SF3A1” into a web-based bioinformatics tool “SNPinfo—SNP Function Prediction” (http://snpinfo.niehs.nih.gov/snpinfo/snpfunc.htm) with allele frequency restricted to “CHB” and “Asian” populations. The tool integrates GWAS and candidate gene information to predict functional characteristics of both non-coding and coding SNPs, such as transcription-factor-binding site (TFBS), microRNA-binding site, splice site, regulatory potential score, Polyphen and so on. As a result, 32 SNPs with MAF of CHB or Asian > 5% were retrieved, among which only rs10376 and rs5753073 were predicted to locate in the binding sites of microRNA with the miRanda scores for two alleles differed by ≥ 16. Then, another bioinformatics tool “miRNA SNP v2.0” (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/miRNASNP2/) was adopted to predict the function of rs2839998 because of its ambiguous result by “SNPinfo—SNP Function Prediction”. As expected, the SNP was also predicted to be a microRNA-binding site. Besides, the SNP of rs2074733 was revealed to be associated with increased risk of pancreatic cancer in our previous study. Therefore, four SNPs (rs10376, rs5753073, rs2839998 and rs2074733) were finally selected in our study.

DNA isolation and genotyping

5ml peripheral blood sample from each case and control subject was used to isolate genomic DNA by using RelaxGene Blood System DP319-02 (Tiangen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster city, CA) was applied to determine the genotypes of rs2074733, rs10376, rs2839998 and rs5753073 by using the TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assay. (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Amplification was done under the following conditions: 95°Cfor 10 min followed by 45 cycle of 94°C for 30 s and 62°C for 1 min. Data were analyzed using Allelic Discrimination Program (Applied Biosystems). In addition, we randomly selected 5% samples and genotyped twice as quality control with a concordance rate of 100%.

Statistical analysis

To evaluate the differences in distribution of sex, age, smoking, drinking status and genotypes between case and control groups, Pearson χ2 test and t test were employed where appropriate. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for genotypes was tested in controls by a goodness-of-fit χ2-test. The associations between rs2074733, rs10376, rs2839998 and rs5753073 and CRC risk were evaluated by the OR and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using unconditional logistic regression analysis adjusted by age, sex, smoking habit and alcohol use. SPSS 12.0 software was used to perform the two sided statistical analyses and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

In the present study, we have recruited 801 CRC patients and 817 cancer-free healthy individuals, whose characteristics are shown in . The mean age of patients and controls were 58.18 years (±11.68) and 57.51 years (±11.44), respectively. Among cases 58.4% were males compared with 58.0% among controls. Additionally, 35.3% cases were smokers and 31.6% cases with drinking habits. There were no significant differences in the distribution of age (P = 0.244), sex (P = 0.867), smoking habit (P = 0.122) and alcohol use (P = 0.453) between case and control groups. a: P value was calculated by t test b: P value was calculated by χ 2 test

Association analysis

Genotype distributions of the SF3A1 polymorphisms in the CRC patients and control individuals are shown in . The genotypes of the rs5753073, rs2839998, rs10376 and rs2074733 in controls conformed to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) with P values of 0.802, 0.734, 0.668 and 0.208, respectively. The logistic regression analysis showed no significant associations between the heterozygote and homozygote variations of all these 4 SNPs and CRC risk after adjusted by age, sex, smoking habit and alcohol use. For example, individuals with rs5753073 GG or GA genotype showed similar CRC risk compared to those with the AA genotype (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.37–1.44 and OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68–1.08). Similarly, there were no differences in the genotype distributions of rs2839998, rs10376 and rs2074733 between cases and controls. We next stratified our study subjects to investigate the relationship of the SF3A1 polymorphisms with smoking and alcohol use status. However, we still observed no significant associations between these SNPs and CRC risk in smoking and alcohol use subgroups (P>0.05) (Tables ). a: P values were calculated by χ 2 test b: Adjusted by age, sex, smoking and alcohol use c: Additive model a: Adjusted by age, sex and alcohol use a: Adjusted by age, sex and smoking

Discussion

In the present study, we hypothesized that polymorphisms of SF3A1 might contribute to the genetic susceptibility of CRC. Since the RNA splicing system is indispensable for functional diversity of protein and gene control in eukaryotic organisms, dysregulation of such machinery, including mutations of the core genes, can cause various diseases and cancers [37,38]. As a member of splicing complex, SF3A1 has been implicated in various cancers. We thus proposed that polymorphisms might affect the SF3A1 expression, then resulting in aberrant alternative splicing events in CRC. The four candidate polymorphisms selected based on bioinformatics analysis and previous findings are located within non-coding regions of SF3A1. More than 1,200 GWAS studies have detected nearly 6,500 susceptibility loci[39] and it is noteworthy that 93% of which are located within non-coding regions[5]. Some of SNPs located within regulatory non-coding regions can affect gene expression and are major components in complex disease predisposition [40]. Among the four polymorphisms, rs10736, rs5753073 and rs2839998 are located in the 3’untranslated region (UTR), where microRNA binds and regulates the mRNA expression. These bindings can be affected by SNPs that reside in the microRNA target site, which can either abolish existing binding sites or create illegitimate binding sites, having a different effect on gene expression and representing another type of genetic variability that can influence the risk of certain human diseases[41]. Accumulative evidences have revealed that polymorphisms within micro-RNA-binding sites are associated with breast cancer[42], bladder cancer[43] and colorectal cancer[44]. In addition to microRNA target sites, the vast majority of CRC SNPs revealed by GWAS overlapped with at least one enhancer in colon crypt, some of which were significantly associated with low-frequency lost variant enhancer loci (VELs)[45] and linked to altered expression level of their target genes. Hence, the above researches suggested the putative roles of our non-coding SNPs in CRC carcinogenesis. To investigate the roles of SF3A1 polymorphisms in contributing to the susceptibility of CRC, we performed an association analysis of rs5753073, rs2839998, rs10376 and rs2074733 in 801 cases and 817 cancer-free controls in a Chinese population. However, all of these SNPs have failed to be associated with CRC risk. When stratified analyses were performed by the smoking and alcohol use status, we still obtained no statistically significant results. We proposed that the limited sample size might be insufficient for this association study, therefore more cases and controls are required in the future. Some limitations also existed in our current study. First, as a hospital-based case-control study, selection bias might not avoid. Therefore, larger prospective studies are participated to confirm our results. Second, CRC is a heterogeneous disease in which environmental factors play an important role. Therefore, more other risk factors should be considered to further elucidate the etiology of CRC. In summary, we firstly investigated the associations between polymorphisms of SF3A1 and CRC risk. Our study demonstrated that rs5753073, rs2839998, rs10376 and rs2074733 did not confer to the risk of CRC based on the current hospital-based study. Certainly, larger population-based studies with comprehensive design are needed to further clarify the role of polymorphisms of SF3A1 in the etiology of CRC.
Table 1

Distribution of characteristics among cases and controls.

VariablesCase (N = 801) No. (%)Control (N = 817) No. (%) P
Age (years)58.18±11.6857.51±11.440.244 a
Sex0.867 b
  Male468(58.4)474(58.0)
  Female333(41.6)343(42.0)
Smoking
  Yes283 (35.3)259 (31.7)0.122 b
  No518 (64.7)558 (68.3)
alcohol use
  Yes253 (31.6)244 (29.9)0.453 b
  No548 (68.4)573 (70.1)

a: P value was calculated by t test

b: P value was calculated by χ 2 test

Table 2

Association between selected polymorphisms and CRC risk.

SF3A1- genotypeCase (N = 801) No. (%)Control (N = 817) No. (%) P-HWEMAF in 1000 genomes projectMAF in CaseMAF in Control P a P b OR b (95% CI)
rs57530730.8020.1200.1340.153
AA594 (75.0)584 (71.8)0.3251.00
AG183 (23.1)209 (25.7)0.1830.86 (0.68–1.08)
GG15 (1.9)20 (2.5)0.3610.73 (0.37–1.44)
A/G0.1320.1190.85 (0.70–1.04)
Additive c 0.1200.86 (0.70–1.04)
rs28399980.7340.3500.3370.315
GG340 (44.6)368 (46.7)0.2881.00
GA330 (43.3)344 (43.7)0.7151.04 (0.84–1.29)
AA92 (12.1)76 (9.6)0.1051.32 (0.94–1.86)
G/A0.1800.1661.11 (0.96–1.29)
Additive0.1681.11 (0.96–1.29)
rs103760.6680.0700.0930.105
CC658 (83.0)640 (80.2)0.2561.00
AC123 (15.5)148 (18.5)0.1240.81 (0.63–1.06)
AA12 (1.5)10 (1.3)0.7601.14 (0.49–2.66)
C/A0.2350.2410.87 (0.69–1.10)
Additive0.2520.88 (0.70–1.10)
rs20747330.2080.4700.4670.467
TT221 (27.9)221 (27.4)0.8841.00
TC402 (50.8)420 (52.0)0.6690.95 (0.75–1.20)
CC169 (21.3)167 (20.7)0.9171.02 (0.76–1.35)
T/C0.9730.9621.00 (0.87–1.15)
Additive0.9621.00 (0.87–1.16)

a: P values were calculated by χ 2 test

b: Adjusted by age, sex, smoking and alcohol use

c: Additive model

Table 3

Subgroup analysis according to the smoking status.

No SmokersSmokers
SF3A1- genotypeCase (N = 518) No. (%)Control (N = 558) No. (%) P a OR (95% CI)Case (N = 283) No. (%)Control (N = 259) No. (%) P a OR (95% CI)
rs5753073
AA387 (75.3)406 (73.0)1.00207 (74.5)178 (69.3)1.00
AG116 (22.6)138 (24.8)0.4860.90 (0.68–1.20)67 (24.1)71 (27.6)0.2770.80 (0.54–1.19)
GG11 (2.1)12 (2.2)0.8830.94 (0.41–2.16)4 (1.4)8 (3.1)0.1410.40 (0.12–1.36)
rs2839998
GG219 (44.4)254 (47.1)1.00121 (45.0)114 (45.8)1.00
GA215 (43.6)229 (42.5)0.5141.09 (0.84–1.42)115 (42.8)115 (46.2)0.7440.94 (0.65–1.36)
AA59 (12.0)56 (10.4)0.3391.22 (0.81–1.84)33 (12.3)20 (8.0)0.1691.55 (0.83–2.87)
rs10376
CC424 (82.8)436 (79.4)1.00234 (83.3)204 (81.9)1.00
AC82 (16.0)106 (19.3)0.1490.79 (0.58–1.09)41 (14.6)42 (16.9)0.5600.87 (0.54–1.40)
AA6 (1.2)7 (1.3)0.7760.85 (0.28–2.57)6 (2.1)3 (1.2)0.4891.65 (0.40–6.74)
rs2074733
TT148 (28.9)156 (28.4)1.0073 (26.1)65 (25.2)1.00
TC250 (48.8)281 (51.1)0.7140.95 (0.71–1.26)152 (54.3)139 (53.9)0.7790.94 (0.63–1.42)
CC114 (22.3)113 (20.5)0.6831.08 (0.76–1.52)55 (19.6)54 (20.9)0.6250.88 (0.53–1.47)

a: Adjusted by age, sex and alcohol use

Table 4

Subgroup analysis according to the drinking status.

No DrinkersDrinkers
SF3A1- genotypeCase (N = 548) No. (%)Control (N = 573) No. (%) P a OR (95% CI)Case (N = 253) No. (%)Control (N = 244) No. (%) P a OR (95% CI)
rs5753073
AA414 (76.2)416 (73.0)1.00180 (72.3)168 (69.1)1.00
AG118 (21.7)141 (24.7)0.4640.86 (0.57–1.30)65 (26.1)68 (28.0)0.2350.84 (0.64–1.12)
GG11 (2.0)13 (2.3)0.1710.41 (0.12–1.46)4 (1.6)7 (2.9)0.6630.83 (0.37–1.89)
rs2839998
GG241 (46.1)255 (46.2)1.0099 (41.4)113 (47.9)1.00
GA222 (42.4)243 (44.0)0.2551.26 (0.85–1.86)108 (51.7)101 (42.8)0.7860.97 (0.75–1.24)
AA60 (11.5)54 (9.8)0.0601.82 (0.98–3.41)32 (13.4)22 (9.3)0.4691.16 (0.77–1.75)
rs10376
CC448 (82.7)447 (79.5)1.00210 (83.7)193 (81.8)1.00
AC87 (16.1)109 (19.4)0.5580.86 (0.52–1.43)36 (14.3)39 (16.5)0.1420.79 (0.58–1.08)
AA7 (1.3)6 (1.1)0.9420.95 (0.25–3.62)5 (2.0)4 (1.7)0.8121.14 (0.38–3.43)
rs2074733
TT166 (30.6)156 (27.6)1.0055 (22.1)65 (26.9)1.00
TC265 (48.8)294 (51.9)0.3661.23 (0.79–1.92)137 (55.0)126 (52.1)0.2400.85 (0.64–1.12)
CC112 (20.6)116 (20.5)0.2841.34 (0.79–2.29)57 (22.9)51 (21.1)0.5500.90 (0.64–1.27)

a: Adjusted by age, sex and smoking

  45 in total

1.  Single-nucleotide polymorphisms inside microRNA target sites influence tumor susceptibility.

Authors:  Milena S Nicoloso; Hao Sun; Riccardo Spizzo; Hyunsoo Kim; Priyankara Wickramasinghe; Masayoshi Shimizu; Sylwia E Wojcik; Jana Ferdin; Tanja Kunej; Lianchun Xiao; Siranoush Manoukian; Giorgio Secreto; Fernando Ravagnani; Xuemei Wang; Paolo Radice; Carlo M Croce; Ramana V Davuluri; George A Calin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  The Biology of Genomes. Disease risk links to gene regulation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pennisi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A genome-wide association study identifies two new lung cancer susceptibility loci at 13q12.12 and 22q12.2 in Han Chinese.

Authors:  Zhibin Hu; Chen Wu; Yongyong Shi; Huan Guo; Xueying Zhao; Zhihua Yin; Lei Yang; Juncheng Dai; Lingmin Hu; Wen Tan; Zhiqiang Li; Qifei Deng; Jiucun Wang; Wei Wu; Guangfu Jin; Yue Jiang; Dianke Yu; Guoquan Zhou; Hongyan Chen; Peng Guan; Yijiang Chen; Yongqian Shu; Lin Xu; Xiangyang Liu; Li Liu; Ping Xu; Baohui Han; Chunxue Bai; Yuxia Zhao; Haibo Zhang; Ying Yan; Hongxia Ma; Jiaping Chen; Mingjie Chu; Feng Lu; Zhengdong Zhang; Feng Chen; Xinru Wang; Li Jin; Jiachun Lu; Baosen Zhou; Daru Lu; Tangchun Wu; Dongxin Lin; Hongbing Shen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 4.  New connections between splicing and human disease.

Authors:  Richard A Padgett
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Global cancer statistics.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Frequent pathway mutations of splicing machinery in myelodysplasia.

Authors:  Kenichi Yoshida; Masashi Sanada; Yuichi Shiraishi; Daniel Nowak; Yasunobu Nagata; Ryo Yamamoto; Yusuke Sato; Aiko Sato-Otsubo; Ayana Kon; Masao Nagasaki; George Chalkidis; Yutaka Suzuki; Masashi Shiosaka; Ryoichiro Kawahata; Tomoyuki Yamaguchi; Makoto Otsu; Naoshi Obara; Mamiko Sakata-Yanagimoto; Ken Ishiyama; Hiraku Mori; Florian Nolte; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Shuichi Miyawaki; Sumio Sugano; Claudia Haferlach; H Phillip Koeffler; Lee-Yung Shih; Torsten Haferlach; Shigeru Chiba; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Satoru Miyano; Seishi Ogawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Alternative splicing of SLC39A14 in colorectal cancer is regulated by the Wnt pathway.

Authors:  Kasper Thorsen; Francisco Mansilla; Troels Schepeler; Bodil Øster; Mads H Rasmussen; Lars Dyrskjøt; Rotem Karni; Martin Akerman; Adrian R Krainer; Søren Laurberg; Claus L Andersen; Torben F Ørntoft
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Epigenomic enhancer profiling defines a signature of colon cancer.

Authors:  Batool Akhtar-Zaidi; Richard Cowper-Sal-lari; Olivia Corradin; Alina Saiakhova; Cynthia F Bartels; Dheepa Balasubramanian; Lois Myeroff; James Lutterbaugh; Awad Jarrar; Matthew F Kalady; Joseph Willis; Jason H Moore; Paul J Tesar; Thomas Laframboise; Sanford Markowitz; Mathieu Lupien; Peter C Scacheri
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Multiple common susceptibility variants near BMP pathway loci GREM1, BMP4, and BMP2 explain part of the missing heritability of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ian P M Tomlinson; Luis G Carvajal-Carmona; Sara E Dobbins; Albert Tenesa; Angela M Jones; Kimberley Howarth; Claire Palles; Peter Broderick; Emma E M Jaeger; Susan Farrington; Annabelle Lewis; James G D Prendergast; Alan M Pittman; Evropi Theodoratou; Bianca Olver; Marion Walker; Steven Penegar; Ella Barclay; Nicola Whiffin; Lynn Martin; Stephane Ballereau; Amy Lloyd; Maggie Gorman; Steven Lubbe; Bryan Howie; Jonathan Marchini; Clara Ruiz-Ponte; Ceres Fernandez-Rozadilla; Antoni Castells; Angel Carracedo; Sergi Castellvi-Bel; David Duggan; David Conti; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Harry Campbell; Oliver Sieber; Lara Lipton; Peter Gibbs; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Joanne Young; Paul N Baird; Steven Gallinger; Polly Newcomb; John Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Lauri A Aaltonen; David J Kerr; Jeremy Cheadle; Paul Pharoah; Graham Casey; Richard S Houlston; Malcolm G Dunlop
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Meta-analysis of three genome-wide association studies identifies susceptibility loci for colorectal cancer at 1q41, 3q26.2, 12q13.13 and 20q13.33.

Authors:  Richard S Houlston; Jeremy Cheadle; Sara E Dobbins; Albert Tenesa; Angela M Jones; Kimberley Howarth; Sarah L Spain; Peter Broderick; Enric Domingo; Susan Farrington; James G D Prendergast; Alan M Pittman; Evi Theodoratou; Christopher G Smith; Bianca Olver; Axel Walther; Rebecca A Barnetson; Michael Churchman; Emma E M Jaeger; Steven Penegar; Ella Barclay; Lynn Martin; Maggie Gorman; Rachel Mager; Elaine Johnstone; Rachel Midgley; Iina Niittymäki; Sari Tuupanen; James Colley; Shelley Idziaszczyk; Huw J W Thomas; Anneke M Lucassen; D Gareth R Evans; Eamonn R Maher; Timothy Maughan; Antigone Dimas; Emmanouil Dermitzakis; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Lauri A Aaltonen; Paul Pharoah; David J Kerr; Luis G Carvajal-Carmona; Harry Campbell; Malcolm G Dunlop; Ian P M Tomlinson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  5 in total

1.  Exome sequencing in one family with gastric- and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jessada Thutkawkorapin; Simone Picelli; Vinaykumar Kontham; Tao Liu; Daniel Nilsson; Annika Lindblom
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.797

2.  Identifying subtype-specific associations between gene expression and DNA methylation profiles in breast cancer.

Authors:  Garam Lee; Lisa Bang; So Yeon Kim; Dokyoon Kim; Kyung-Ah Sohn
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.063

3.  Systematic analysis and prediction model construction of alternative splicing events in hepatocellular carcinoma: a study on the basis of large-scale spliceseq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Authors:  Lingpeng Yang; Yang He; Zifei Zhang; Wentao Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Cell-cycle and apoptosis related and proteomics-based signaling pathways of human hepatoma Huh-7 cells treated by three currently used multi-RTK inhibitors.

Authors:  Xuejiao Ren; Qingning Zhang; Wenyan Guo; Lan Wang; Tao Wu; Wei Zhang; Ming Liu; Dezhi Kong
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 5.988

5.  Broad regulation of gene isoform expression by Wnt signaling in cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Idris; Nathan Harmston; Enrico Petretto; Babita Madan; David M Virshup
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 4.942

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.