| Literature DB >> 26079114 |
Robert Fischer, Seth Judson, Kerri Miazgowicz, Trenton Bushmaker, Joseph Prescott, Vincent J Munster.
Abstract
We evaluated the stability of Ebola virus on surfaces and in fluids under simulated environmental conditions for the climate of West Africa and for climate-controlled hospitals. This virus remains viable for a longer duration on surfaces in hospital conditions than in African conditions and in liquid than in dried blood.Entities:
Keywords: Ebola virus; environment; fluids; simulated outbreak environments; stability; surfaces; viruses
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26079114 PMCID: PMC4480404 DOI: 10.3201/eid2107.150253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Linear regression model showing the effect of different environmental conditions and surfaces on survival of Ebola virus (EBOV). Virus was dried on 3 surfaces found in outbreak settings at A) 27°C, 80% relative humidity (RH) (West African tropical conditions) and B) 21°C, 40% RH (climate-controlled hospital conditions). Virus concentration was reduced at a significantly slower rate on all surfaces in hospital conditions than in tropical conditions (p<0.0001 for all surfaces). Triplicate samples were taken at each time point. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM virus titer. Dashed line indicates the limit of detection for the assay. An analysis of covariance equivalent test was used to compare linear regression models and determine differences in virus reduction rates. TCID50, 50% tissue culture infectious dose.
Linear regression models for survival of Ebola virus on surfaces and in fluids at different environmental conditions*
| Condition | Temperature, °C | Relative humidity, % | Model† | r2 | Virus log reduction time, d‡ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stainless steel | 27 | 80 | Y = −2.240X + 6.729 | 0.9798 | 0.45 |
| Stainless steel | 21 | 40 | Y = −0.7829X + 6.564 | 0.8544 | 1.3 |
| Plastic | 27 | 80 | Y = −2.205X + 7.008 | 0.9745 | 0.45 |
| Plastic | 21 | 40 | Y = −0.5445X + 6.188 | 0.8303 | 1.8 |
| Tyvek | 27 | 80 | Y = −1.599X + 6.939 | 0.9713 | 0.63 |
| Tyvek | 21 | 40 | Y = −0.4631X + 6.709 | 0.8878 | 2.2 |
| Drying human blood | 27 | 80 | Y = −0.6806X + 4.951 | 0.8724 | 1.5 |
| Drying human blood | 21 | 40 | Y = −0.6917X + 4.828 | 0.9037 | 1.5 |
| Liquid human blood | 27 | NA | Y = −0.1148X + 4.651 | 0.2892 | 8.7 |
| Liquid human blood | 21 | NA | Y = −0.05000X + 4.231 | 0.05293 | 20 |
| Water | 27 | NA | Y = −1.133X + 4.483 | 0.9607 | 0.88 |
| Water | 21 | NA | Y = −0.5694X + 4.201 | 0.9139 | 1.8 |
*NA, not applicable. †Y, log10 50% tissue culture infectious dose/mL; X, days. ‡In hospital conditions, virus titer on steel was reduced significantly faster than on plastic (p = 0.004) and on Tyvek (p<0.0001), but there was no significant difference in reduction between Tyvek and plastic (p = 0.13). In tropical conditions, there was no significant difference in virus titer reduction on steel and on plastic (p = 0.78). However, virus decayed more slowly on Tyvek than on steel (p<0.0001) and on plastic (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in reduction rate in virus titer in drying human blood in hospital or tropical conditions (p = 0.92). Stability of virus in liquid blood did not fit a linear regression model. Virus was reduced significantly faster at 27°C than in water at 21°C (p = 0.0001).
Figure 2Linear regression model showing stability of Ebola virus (EBOV) in fluids under different environmental conditions. A) EBOV stability in water at 2 environmental temperatures. Virus concentration was reduced at a significantly faster rate in 27°C water than in 21°C water (p = 0.0001). B) Stability in drying or liquid EBOV-spiked human blood samples at 2 environmental conditions. Virus concentration was reduced at a significantly faster rate by drying than in liquid blood at both conditions (p<0.0001 for each condition). No significant difference between reduction rates in virus titer in drying human blood at both conditions was found (p = 0.92). Triplicate samples were taken at each time point. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM virus titer. Dashed line indicates the limit of detection for the assay. An analysis of covariance equivalent test was used to compare linear regression models and determine differences in virus reduction rates. TCID50, 50% tissue culture infectious dose.
Stability of Ebola virus in infected nonhuman primate blood under different environmental conditions*
| Blood sample, condition | Initial virus titer, log10 TCID50/ mL | No. days viable |
|---|---|---|
| NHP 1 | ||
| Drying 27°C, RH 80% | 6.5 | 5 |
| Drying 21°C, RH 40% | 6.5 | 1 |
| Liquid 27°C | 7.2 | 14 |
| Liquid 21°C | 7.2 | 14 |
| NHP 2 | ||
| Drying 27°C, RH 80% | 2.8 | 5 |
| Drying 21°C, RH 40% | 2.8 | 1 |
| Liquid 27°C | 4.2 | 11 |
| Liquid 21°C | 4.2 | 1 |
| NHP 3 | ||
| Drying 27°C, RH 80% | 7.2 | 4 |
| Drying 21°C, RH 40% | 7.2 | 4 |
| Liquid 27°C | 6.5 | 8 |
| Liquid 21°C | 6.5 | 14 |
*TCID50, 50% tissue culture infectious dose; NHP, nonhuman primate; RH, relative humidity.