Literature DB >> 26076915

Laparoscopic robot-assisted resection of tumors located in posterosuperior liver segments.

Ugo Boggi1, Fabio Caniglia, Fabio Vistoli, Francesca Costa, Erika Pieroni, Vittorio Grazio Perrone.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic resection of liver tumors located in the posterosuperior segments is a challenging operation that could be facilitated by robotic assistance. Laparoscopic resection of 12 tumors located in posterosuperior segments (IVa: 1; VII: 5; VIII: 6) was carried out under robotic assistance. All patients had a single tumor nodule. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Surgery required a mean of 260.4 min (115-430) and was completed laparoscopically in all but one patient, who required conversion to mini-laparotomy because of intolerance of pneumoperitoneum (8.3%). Mean estimated blood loss was 252.7 ml (50-600), making transfusion necessary in 3 patients (25.0%). Post-operative complications occurred in 4 patients (33.3%), being of Clavien-Dindo grade II in 3 patients (25.0%) and Clavien-Dindo grade IV in 1 patient (8.3%). Reoperation was required in 1 patient, who subsequently had a long hospital stay, because of decompensated cirrhosis. Median length of hospital stay was 8.5 days (7-96). No patient was readmitted. Pathology showed hepatocellular carcinoma in 7 patients (58.3%), liver metastasis in 2 patients (16.6%), and hepatic adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hemangioma in one patient each (8.3%). All patients had a margin negative resection. After a mean follow-up period of 21.4 months (±24.4), no patient with malignant histology developed recurrence. Our initial experience confirms that laparoscopic robot-assisted resection of tumors located in the posterosuperior segments is feasible. Further experience is needed before final conclusions can be drawn and meaningful comparison with other surgical techniques becomes possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26076915     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-015-0304-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  17 in total

1.  The Leipzig experience with robotic valve surgery.

Authors:  R Autschbach; J F Onnasch; V Falk; T Walther; M Krüger; L O Schilling; F W Mohr
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.620

2.  Liver tumors and minimally invasive surgery: a feasibility study.

Authors:  B Edwin; T Mala; I Gladhaug; E Fosse; Y Mathisen; A Bergan; O Søreide
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.878

3.  Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study.

Authors:  Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato; Andrea Coratti; Luigi Bianco; Fabio Caniglia; Andrea Laurenzi; Francesco Puleo; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments.

Authors:  Luciano Casciola; Alberto Patriti; Graziano Ceccarelli; Alberto Bartoli; Cecilia Ceribelli; Alessandro Spaziani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: a web-based study on the global diffusion of laparoscopic liver surgery prior to the 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Iwate, Japan.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Osamu Itano; Yuko Kitagawa; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 7.027

6.  A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Daisuke Ban; Minoru Tanabe; Hiromitsu Ito; Yuichiro Otsuka; Hiroyuki Nitta; Yuta Abe; Yasushi Hasegawa; Toshio Katagiri; Chisato Takagi; Osamu Itano; Hironori Kaneko; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.027

7.  Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more.

Authors:  Alan J Koffron; Greg Auffenberg; Robert Kung; Michael Abecassis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Nicholas O'Rourke; David Iannitti; Ibrahim Dagher; Alan J Koffron; Mark Thomas; Brice Gayet; Ho Seong Han; Go Wakabayashi; Giulio Belli; Hironori Kaneko; Chen-Guo Ker; Olivier Scatton; Alexis Laurent; Eddie K Abdalla; Prosanto Chaudhury; Erik Dutson; Clark Gamblin; Michael D'Angelica; David Nagorney; Giuliano Testa; Daniel Labow; Derrik Manas; Ronnie T Poon; Heidi Nelson; Robert Martin; Bryan Clary; Wright C Pinson; John Martinie; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Robert Goldstein; Sasan Roayaie; David Barlet; Joseph Espat; Michael Abecassis; Myrddin Rees; Yuman Fong; Kelly M McMasters; Christoph Broelsch; Ron Busuttil; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Strasberg; Ravi S Chari
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients.

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; T Clark Gamblin; David A Geller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  U Boggi; S Signori; N De Lio; V G Perrone; F Vistoli; M Belluomini; C Cappelli; G Amorese; F Mosca
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  9 in total

1.  Robotic hepatic resection in postero-superior region of liver.

Authors:  Zhiming Zhao; Zhuzeng Yin; Lichao Pan; Chenggang Li; Minggen Hu; Wan Yee Lau; Rong Liu
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-10-08

Review 2.  Systematic review of the feasibility and future of laparoscopic liver resection for difficult lesions.

Authors:  Kenichiro Araki; Norio Kubo; Akira Watanabe; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Ken Shirabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Fully robotic left hepatectomy for malignant tumor: technique and initial results.

Authors:  Marco Vito Marino; Gaspare Gulotta; Andrzej Lech Komorowski
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-06

4.  Robotic resection for posterosuperior liver lesions: is it really superior to laparoscopic resection?

Authors:  Andrew K Y Fung; Kit-Fai Lee
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Robotic right segmental hepatectomy for the treatment of a giant hepatic hemangioma-a case report.

Authors:  Christoforos Efthimiadis; Aristeidis Ioannidis; Marios Grigoriou; Konstantinia Kofina; Michael Lazaridis; Christoforos Kosmidis
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-24

6.  A Sling Technique for Laparoscopic Resection of Segment Seven of the Liver.

Authors:  Igor Mashchenko; Anna Trtchounian; Christopher Buchholz; Andrew N de la Torre
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 7.  All the Routes for Laparoscopic Liver Segment VIII Resection: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Alessandro Anselmo; Bruno Sensi; Giulia Bacchiocchi; Leandro Siragusa; Giuseppe Tisone
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Implementing a robotic liver resection program does not always require prior laparoscopic experience.

Authors:  Emanuele Balzano; Lorenzo Bernardi; Giovanni Tincani; Davide Ghinolfi; Fabio Melandro; Jessica Bronzoni; Sonia Meli; Giuseppe Arenga; Giandomenico Biancofiore; Laura Crocetti; Paolo De Simone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Selecting incision-dominant cases for robotic liver resection: towards outpatient hepatectomy with rapid recovery.

Authors:  Laleh G Melstrom; Susanne G Warner; Yanghee Woo; Virginia Sun; Byrne Lee; Gagandeep Singh; Yuman Fong
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.