Literature DB >> 26075461

Standardized DMEK Technique: Reducing Complications Using Prestripped Tissue, Novel Glass Injector, and Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Gas.

Mark A Terry1, Michael D Straiko, Peter B Veldman, Julia C Talajic, Cor VanZyl, Christopher S Sales, Zachary M Mayko.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report low complication rates in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas, a novel glass injector, and donor tissue prestripped by an eye bank technician.
METHODS: A standardized technique of DMEK was performed in 80 consecutive Fuchs corneal dystrophy cases using technician-prestripped tissue, a novel glass injector, a modified Yoeruek tap technique, and an SF6 gas (20% concentration) bubble for prolonged tissue support. Twenty-five donors were premarked with an "S" stamp for intraoperative orientation. Surgery was performed by 2 experienced DMEK surgeons and 2 inexperienced cornea fellows. Complications were recorded, and the percent endothelial cell loss was calculated at 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: There were 5 cases that received an air bubble injection postoperatively (6% rebubble rate). There were 6 grafts that immediately failed, 2 because of excessive surgical trauma, and 4 because of upside-down graft placement documented by optical coherence tomography. None of the 25 cases with an S stamp failed. Recipient corneas cleared quickly with no clinical evidence of toxicity from the SF6 gas bubble, and the grafts experienced a mean endothelial cell loss of 27% at 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Tissue prestripped by an eye bank technician can be safely used for DMEK surgery. SF6 gas for prolonged tissue support may reduce the rebubble rate in DMEK, with no apparent acute toxic effect. An unrecognized upside-down graft was the primary cause of graft failure in this series. Upside-down grafts may be eliminated by the use of donor tissue premarked by the eye bank with an S orientation stamp.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26075461     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  25 in total

1.  "PI-less DMEK": results of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) without a peripheral iridotomy.

Authors:  Eitan Livny; Irit Bahar; Issac Levy; Michael Mimouni; Yoav Nahum
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Vulnerability of corneal endothelial cells to mechanical trauma from indentation forces assessed using contact mechanics and fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Manuel A Ramirez-Garcia; Yousuf M Khalifa; Mark R Buckley
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With Previous Glaucoma Surgery.

Authors:  Carolina Aravena; Fei Yu; Sophie X Deng
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Clinical results after single asymmetrical shark fin for graft orientation in DMEK.

Authors:  Annekatrin Rickmann; Karl Boden; André M Trouvain; Lisa J Müller; Catheline Bocqué; Sebastian Thaler; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in complex eyes.

Authors:  Aazim Siddiqui; Winston D Chamberlain
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.299

6.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Allister Gibbons; Ella H Leung; Sonia H Yoo
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Aspiration of Tri-folded, Endothelium-In Grafts for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sezen Karakus; Mehrnaz Ighani; Puntakarn Noparat; Marjan Tofigh; Eric Chiang; Kali Barnes; Conan Y Chen; Tiffany S Liu; Allen O Eghrari
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 8.  [Complications of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty].

Authors:  K Spaniol; M Borrelli; C Holtmann; S Schrader; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Quantitative Analysis of Endothelial Cell Loss in Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts.

Authors:  Meraf A Wolle; David L DeMill; Lauren Johnson; Stephen I Lentz; Maria A Woodward; Shahzad I Mian
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Lower Corneal Haze and Aberrations in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Fellow Eyes for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

Authors:  William H Waldrop; Matthew J Gillings; Danielle M Robertson; W Matthew Petroll; V Vinod Mootha
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.