Literature DB >> 26072659

Fluid resuscitation in ICU patients: quo vadis?

Anders Perner1, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Jan Bakker.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26072659     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-3900-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Fluid challenge revisited.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Max Harry Weil
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study.

Authors:  Y Mahjoub; V Lejeune; L Muller; S Perbet; L Zieleskiewicz; F Bart; B Veber; C Paugam-Burtz; S Jaber; A Ayham; E Zogheib; S Lasocki; A Vieillard-Baron; H Quintard; O Joannes-Boyau; G Plantefève; P Montravers; S Duperret; M Lakhdari; N Ammenouche; E Lorne; M Slama; H Dupont
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  Predicting fluid responsiveness with transthoracic echocardiography is not yet evidence based.

Authors:  M Wetterslev; N Haase; R R Johansen; A Perner
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Understanding hypovolaemia.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.

Authors:  R P Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  The highs and lows of blood pressure: toward meaningful clinical targets in patients with shock.

Authors:  Sheldon A Magder
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Interaction between fluids and vasoactive agents on mortality in septic shock: a multicenter, observational study.

Authors:  Jason Waechter; Anand Kumar; Stephen E Lapinsky; John Marshall; Peter Dodek; Yaseen Arabi; Joseph E Parrillo; R Phillip Dellinger; Allan Garland
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: the ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators.

Authors:  D C Angus; A E Barnato; D Bell; R Bellomo; C-R Chong; T J Coats; A Davies; A Delaney; D A Harrison; A Holdgate; B Howe; D T Huang; T Iwashyna; J A Kellum; S L Peake; F Pike; M C Reade; K M Rowan; M Singer; S A R Webb; L A Weissfeld; D M Yealy; J D Young
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Massimo Antonelli; Richard Beale; Jan Bakker; Christoph Hofer; Roman Jaeschke; Alexandre Mebazaa; Michael R Pinsky; Jean Louis Teboul; Jean Louis Vincent; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Erratum to: Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Christoph Hofer; Jean-Louis Teboul; Ville Pettila; Erika Wilkman; Zsolt Molnar; Giorgio Della Rocca; Cesar Aldecoa; Antonio Artigas; Sameer Jog; Michael Sander; Claudia Spies; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cardiovascular clusters in septic shock combining clinical and echocardiographic parameters: a post hoc analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Geri; Philippe Vignon; Alix Aubry; Anne-Laure Fedou; Cyril Charron; Stein Silva; Xavier Repessé; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Fluid responsiveness raises many questions-echocardiography may be the answer.

Authors:  Chiara Lazzeri; Adriano Peris
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  T G Eskesen; M Wetterslev; A Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Restricting volumes of resuscitation fluid in adults with septic shock after initial management: the CLASSIC randomised, parallel-group, multicentre feasibility trial.

Authors:  Peter B Hjortrup; Nicolai Haase; Helle Bundgaard; Simon L Thomsen; Robert Winding; Ville Pettilä; Anne Aaen; David Lodahl; Rasmus E Berthelsen; Henrik Christensen; Martin B Madsen; Per Winkel; Jørn Wetterslev; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Comparison of Superior Vena Cava and Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Changes by Echocardiography in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Authors:  Vishal Upadhyay; Deepak Malviya; Soumya Sankar Nath; Manoj Tripathi; Ashish Jha
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2021-03-22

6.  Associations of Hospital and Patient Characteristics with Fluid Resuscitation Volumes in Patients with Severe Sepsis: Post Hoc Analyses of Data from a Multicentre Randomised Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Peter Buhl Hjortrup; Nicolai Haase; Jørn Wetterslev; Anders Perner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Timing of antibiotics, volume and vasoactive infusions in children with sepsis: it is all in the timing.

Authors:  Samiran Ray; Mark J Peters
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.