Literature DB >> 23252861

Predicting fluid responsiveness with transthoracic echocardiography is not yet evidence based.

M Wetterslev1, N Haase, R R Johansen, A Perner.   

Abstract

An essential part of intensive care is to accurately identify fluid responders among patients with circulatory failure. Over the past few years, new techniques have been assessed for rapid and non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness. As transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is becoming an integrated tool in the intensive care unit, this systematic review examined studies evaluating the predictive value of TTE for fluid responsiveness. In October 2012, we searched Pubmed, EMBASE and Web of Science for studies evaluating the predictive value of TTE-derived variables for fluid responsiveness defined as change in thermodilution cardiac output or stroke volume after a fluid challenge or a passive leg raising test. The use of thermodilution was used as inclusion criterion because it is the only method validated to show the change in cardiac output or stroke volume, which defines fluid responsiveness. Of the 4294 evaluated citations, only one study fully met our inclusion criteria. In this study, the predictive value of variations in inferior vena cava diameter (> 16%) for fluid responsiveness was moderate with sensitivity of 71% [95% confidence interval (CI) 44-90], specificity of 100% (95% CI 73-100) and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.90 (95% CI 0.73-0.98). Only one study of TTE-based methods fulfilled the criteria for valid assessment of fluid responsiveness. Before recommending the use of TTE in predicting fluid responsiveness, proper evaluation including thermodilution technique as the gold standard is needed.
© 2012 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23252861     DOI: 10.1111/aas.12045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  9 in total

1.  Fluid resuscitation in ICU patients: quo vadis?

Authors:  Anders Perner; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  T G Eskesen; M Wetterslev; A Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Expert statement for the management of hypovolemia in sepsis.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Maurizio Cecconi; Maria Cronhjort; Michael Darmon; Stephan M Jakob; Ville Pettilä; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  A practical approach to goal-directed echocardiography in the critical care setting.

Authors:  Patricia E Walley; Keith R Walley; Ben Goodgame; Vivek Punjabi; Demetrios Sirounis
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Intravascular volume therapy in adults: Guidelines from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany.

Authors:  Gernot Marx; Achim W Schindler; Christoph Mosch; Joerg Albers; Michael Bauer; Irmela Gnass; Carsten Hobohm; Uwe Janssens; Stefan Kluge; Peter Kranke; Tobias Maurer; Waltraut Merz; Edmund Neugebauer; Michael Quintel; Norbert Senninger; Hans-Joachim Trampisch; Christian Waydhas; Rene Wildenauer; Kai Zacharowski; Michaela Eikermann
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  A bedside ultrasound technique for fluid therapy monitoring in severe hypovolemia: Tissue Doppler imaging of the right ventricle.

Authors:  Erden Erol Unluer; Togay Evrin; Burak Katipoglu; Serdar Bayata
Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci       Date:  2017-12

7.  Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study.

Authors:  Claire Roger; Laurent Zieleskiewicz; Christophe Demattei; Karim Lakhal; Gael Piton; Benjamin Louart; Jean-Michel Constantin; Russell Chabanne; Jean-Sébastien Faure; Yazine Mahjoub; Isabelle Desmeulles; Hervé Quintard; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Laurent Muller
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Fluid responsiveness to passive leg raising in patients with and without coronary artery disease: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Varun Suresh; Manikandan Sethuraman; Jayakumar Karunakaran; Thomas Koshy
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

9.  Effect of VTILVOT variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.

Authors:  Jinzhong Wang; Dexing Zhou; Yi Gao; Zhongyong Wu; Xiaozhi Wang; Chuanzhu Lv
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.