Literature DB >> 24556910

Understanding hypovolaemia.

Anders Perner1, Daniel De Backer.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24556910     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3223-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Authors:  Fabio Cavallaro; Claudio Sandroni; Cristina Marano; Giuseppe La Torre; Alice Mannocci; Chiara De Waure; Giuseppe Bello; Riccardo Maviglia; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury.

Authors:  Herbert P Wiedemann; Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; B Taylor Thompson; Douglas Hayden; Ben deBoisblanc; Alfred F Connors; R Duncan Hite; Andrea L Harabin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Fluid challenge revisited.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Max Harry Weil
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Venous function and central venous pressure: a physiologic story.

Authors:  Simon Gelman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Central venous oxygen saturation for the diagnosis of low cardiac output in septic shock patients.

Authors:  A Perner; N Haase; J Wiis; J O White; A Delaney
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 2.105

6.  Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Yasser Sakr; Charles L Sprung; V Marco Ranieri; Konrad Reinhart; Herwig Gerlach; Rui Moreno; Jean Carlet; Jean-Roger Le Gall; Didier Payen
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Passive leg raising.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.

Authors:  R P Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use.

Authors:  Laurent Muller; Xavier Bobbia; Mehdi Toumi; Guillaume Louart; Nicolas Molinari; Benoit Ragonnet; Hervé Quintard; Marc Leone; Lana Zoric; Jean Yves Lefrant
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Bench-to-bedside review: An approach to hemodynamic monitoring--Guyton at the bedside.

Authors:  Sheldon Magder
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  15 in total

1.  Fluid resuscitation in ICU patients: quo vadis?

Authors:  Anders Perner; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Can one size fit all? The fine line between fluid overload and hypovolemia.

Authors:  Thierry Boulain; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Understanding preload reserve using functional hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Understanding venous return.

Authors:  David A Berlin; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Respiratory variations in the arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation reflect volume status and fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Azriel Perel; Reuven Pizov; Shamay Cotev
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  The surviving sepsis campaign: fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy research priorities in adult patients.

Authors:  Ishaq Lat; Craig M Coopersmith; Daniel De Backer; Craig M Coopersmith
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 7.  Cardiopulmonary Interactions: Physiologic Basis and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2018-02

8.  Volume expansion in the first 4 days of shock: a prospective multicentre study in 19 French intensive care units.

Authors:  Thierry Boulain; Julie Boisrame-Helms; Stephan Ehrmann; Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou; Adrien Bouglé; Arnaud Chiche; Karim Lakhal; Stéphane Gaudry; Sébastien Perbet; Arnaud Desachy; Séverin Cabasson; Isabelle Geneau; Patricia Courouble; Noémie Clavieras; Pablo L Massanet; Frédéric Bellec; Yoan Falquet; François Réminiac; Philippe Vignon; Pierre-François Dequin; Ferhat Meziani
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  T G Eskesen; M Wetterslev; A Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Fluid Resuscitation and Vasopressor Therapy Research Priorities in Adult Patients.

Authors:  Ishaq Lat; Craig M Coopersmith; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 9.296

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.