| Literature DB >> 26068668 |
M Dahlui1, N K Jahan2, H A Majid1, M Y Jalaludin3, L Murray4, M Cantwell4, T T Su1, N Al-Sadat1.
Abstract
Smoking among Malaysian adolescents remains a public health concern despite concerted efforts in tobacco control. The aims of this study were to examine the prevalence and determinants of current-smoking status in young adolescents. This cross sectional study used the first round of the Malaysian Health and Adolescents Research Team's prospective cohort study. It was conducted in three States of the Central and Northern regions of Peninsular Malaysia between March and May 2012. The study used the multistage stratified sampling design. A total of 1,342 adolescents of both sexes, aged 12-13 years, were sampled from randomly selected urban and rural national schools. Information on current smoking status and associated factors were collected by a self-administered, pre-tested, validated, structured questionnaire. Seven percent of the samples were current-smokers; the majority (62%) of them started smoking at the age of 11 years or below. The prevalence of current smoking was significantly higher in males (odds ratio [OR] = 2.37; 95% CI: 1.46, 3.84), those who were influenced by smoker friends (OR = 8.35; 95% CI: 4.90, 14.25), who were unaware of the health risks of smoking (OR =1.85; 95% CI: 1.02, 3.36) and who reported a lack of satisfaction about their overall life (OR =3.26; 95% CI: 1.73, 6.12). The study findings provide valuable information to strengthen the existing school-based smoking prevention program through integration of social competence and social influence curricula. The program should empower the young adolescents to refuse tobacco offers, to overcome social influences and to resist peer pressure to avoid starting smoking. Particular focuses to include mental health service to prevent both emotional and behavioural problems are needed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26068668 PMCID: PMC4466253 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Factors associated with smoking status among respondents (N = 1342).
| Predictor Variables | Total Sample Number | Current Smoker Number | Non-Smoker Number | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | |||
| Gender | Male | 513 (38.2%) | 69 (69%) | 444 (35.7%) | 0.000 |
| Female | 829 (61.8%) | 31 (31%) | 798 (64.3%) | ||
| Ethnicity | Malay | 1091 (81.3%) | 84 (84%) | 1007 (81.1%) | 0.165 |
| Chinese | 105 (7.8%) | 3 (3%) | 102 (8.2%) | ||
| Indian | 105 (7.8%) | 11 (11%) | 94 (7.6%) | ||
| Others | 41 (3.1%) | 2 (2%) | 39 (3.1%) | ||
| Place of residence | Urban | 714 (53.2%) | 44 (44%) | 670 (53.9%) | 0.035 |
| Rural | 628 (46.8%) | 56 (56%) | 572 (46.1%) | ||
| Parental Influence | Parents smoke | 644 (48%) | 59 (59%) | 585 (47.1%) | 0.014 |
| Parents do not smoke | 698 (52%) | 41 (41%) | 657 (52.9%) | ||
| Peer Influence | Friends smoke | 398 (29.7%) | 77 (77%) | 321 (25.8%) | 0.000 |
| Friends do not smoke | 944 (70.3% | 23 (23%) | 921 (74.2%) | ||
| Knowledge about harmful effect of smoking | Have knowledge | 1169 (87.1%) | 79 (79%) | 1090 (87.8%) | 0.012 |
| Have no knowledge | 173 (12.9%) | 21 (21%) | 152 (12.2%) | ||
| Social Networking Media Influence | Communicate with friends using social media | 979 (73%) | 82 (82%) | 897 (72.2%) | 0.020 |
| Do not communicate with friends using social media | 363 (27%) | 18 (18%) | 345 (27.8%) | ||
| Overall satisfaction about life | Dissatisfied | 105 (7.8%) | 19 (19%) | 86 (6.9%) | 0.000 |
| Mixed satisfaction | 144 (10.7%) | 9 (9%) | 135 (10.9%) | ||
| Satisfied | 1093 (81.4%) | 72 (72%) | 1021 (82.2%) | ||
| Total | 1342 (100%) | 100 (7.45%) | 1242 (92.5%) |
Level of significance of P value: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Frequency distribution of the study respondents who have ever tried or experimented with cigarette smoking, even one or two puffs.
| Smoking Characteristics | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Ever smoker | 120 | 8.9 |
| Never smoker | 1222 | 91.1 |
| Total | 1342 | 100.0 |
Frequency distribution of the study respondents who were current smokers and Non-Current smokers.
| Smoking Characteristics | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Current smoker | 100 | 7.45 |
| Non-Current smoker | 1242 | 92.55 |
| Total | 1342 | 100.0 |
Frequency distribution of the study respondents by their age of smoking initiation.
| Age of smoking initiation | Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 years old or younger | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| Within 8 to 9 years | 23 | 23 | 35 |
| Within 10 to 11 years | 27 | 27 | 62 |
| 12 years or above | 38 | 38 | 100 |
| Total | 100 | 100 |
Adjusted Odds Ratio for factors affecting current smoking behaviour.
| Explanatory Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| Gender | Female | |||
| Male | 3.97 | 2.47 | 2.37 | |
| (2.55 to 6.19) | (1.53 to 4.00) | (1.46 to 3.84) | ||
| Ethnicity | Malay | |||
| Chinese | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.41 | |
| (0.11 to 1.31) | (0.13 to 1.66) | (0.11 to 1.48) | ||
| Indian | 1.74 | 3.71 | 3.18 | |
| (0.86 to 3.53) | (1.65 to 8.33) | (1.39 to 7.29) | ||
| Others | 0.58 | 0.94 | 1.04 | |
| (0.13 to 2.51) | (0.20 to 4.35) | (0.22 to 4.82) | ||
| Place of residence | Rural | |||
| Urban | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.71 | |
| (0.50 to 1.21) | (0.43 to 1.13) | (0.44 to 1.16) | ||
| Peer influence—having friends who smoke (Yes/No) | Yes | |||
| No | 8.32 | 8.35 | ||
| (4.88 to 14.19) | (4.90 to 14.25) | |||
| Parental influence—parents who smoke (No/Yes) | No | |||
| 1.03 | 1.07 | |||
| Yes | (0.65 to 1.64)) | (0.67 to 1.70) | ||
| Social networking and media influence-communicate with friends using social media | No | |||
| Yes | 1.54 | 1.61 | ||
| (0.84 to 2.82)) | (0.88 to 2.96) | |||
| Overall satisfaction about life | Satisfied | |||
| Dissatisfied | 3.32 | 3.26 | ||
| (1.77 to 6.24) | (1.73 to 6.12) | |||
| Mixed Satisfaction | 1.06 | 1.03 | ||
| (0.49 to 2.27) | (0.47 to 2.22) | |||
| Knowledge about harmful effect of smoking (Yes/No) | Yes | |||
| No | 1.85 | |||
| (1.02 to 3.36) |
Level of significance of P value:
*P < 0.05;
**P < 0.01;
***P < 0.001.
# indicates the reference category.