Literature DB >> 26065515

Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in dry tea.

Afolabi Adisa1, Angelica Jimenez, Cara Woodham, Kevin Anthony, Thao Nguyen, Mahmoud A Saleh.   

Abstract

Twenty-eight different tea samples sold in the United States were evaluated using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection (FLD) for their contamination with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Many PAHs exhibit carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic properties and have been related to several kinds of cancer in man and experimental animals. The presence of PAHs in environmental samples such as water, sediments, and particulate air has been extensively studied, but food samples have received little attention. Eighteen PAHs congeners were analyzed, with percentage recovery higher than 85%. Contamination expressed as the sum of the 18 analyzed PAHs was between 101 and 1337 μg/kg on dry mass and the average contents in all of the 28 examined samples was 300 μg/kg on dry mass. Seven of the congeners were found in all samples with wide ranges of concentrations as follows: fluorene (7-48 μg/kg), anthracene (1-31 μg/kg), pyrene (1-970 μg/kg), benzo(a)anthracene (1-18 μg/kg) chrysene (17-365 μg/kg), benzo(a)pyrene (1-29 μg/kg), and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (4-119 μg/kg). The two most toxic congeners benzo(a)pyrene and dibenzo(a,h)anthracene were found at high concentrations only in Earl Grey Twinnings, Earl Grey Harney& Sons Fine Teas, and Chai Ultra Spice Black Tea Twinnings. Six PAH congeners are considered as suspected carcinogens (U.S.EPA), formed the basis of the estimation of the toxic equivalent (TEQ), Chai Ultra-Spice Black Tea Twinnings had the highest TEQ (110.9) followed by two grey tea samples, Earl Grey Harney & Sons Fine Tea (57.7) and Earl Grey Twinnings (54.5). Decaffeinated grey teas had the lowest TEQs, decaffeinated Earl Grey Bigelow (9.4) and Green Tea Honey Lemon Decaffeinated Lipton (9.6).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beverages; HPLC; PAH; carcinogens; food contaminants; toxic equivalent factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26065515      PMCID: PMC4881431          DOI: 10.1080/03601234.2015.1028832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci Health B        ISSN: 0360-1234            Impact factor:   1.990


  10 in total

1.  Preliminary comparison of PAH in total suspended particulate samples taken at Niterói and Rio de Janeiro Cities, Brazil.

Authors:  A D Pereira Netto ; R P Barreto; J C Moreira; G Arbilla
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  PCDD/PCDF, chlorinated pesticides and PAH in Chinese teas.

Authors:  Heidelore Fiedler; C K Cheung; M H Wong
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in smoked and non-smoked black teas and tea infusions.

Authors:  Justine Pincemaille; Claude Schummer; Eric Heinen; Gilbert Moris
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 7.514

4.  Rapid determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in tea using two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Lucie Drabova; Jana Pulkrabova; Kamila Kalachova; Monika Tomaniova; Vladimir Kocourek; Jana Hajslova
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 6.057

Review 5.  Cancer risk from occupational and environmental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  P Boffetta; N Jourenkova; P Gustavsson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  PAHs in some brands of tea.

Authors:  Satnam Singh; Amit Vashishth
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food samples by automated on-line in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection.

Authors:  A Ishizaki; K Saito; N Hanioka; S Narimatsu; H Kataoka
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.759

8.  Priority PAHs in orthodox black tea during manufacturing process.

Authors:  Inderpreet Singh Grover; Satnam Singh; Bonamali Pal
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Authors:  I C Nisbet; P K LaGoy
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  In vitro genotoxicity of PAH mixtures and organic extract from urban air particles part II: human cell lines.

Authors:  O Sevastyanova; B Binkova; J Topinka; R J Sram; I Kalina; T Popov; Z Novakova; P B Farmer
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 2.433

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Determination and risk characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of tea by using the Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach.

Authors:  Joon-Goo Lee; Taesuk Lim; Sheen-Hee Kim; Dong-Hyun Kang; Hae-Jung Yoon
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.391

2.  Comparative oesophageal cancer risk assessment of hot beverage consumption (coffee, mate and tea): the margin of exposure of PAH vs very hot temperatures.

Authors:  Alex O Okaru; Anke Rullmann; Adriana Farah; Elvira Gonzalez de Mejia; Mariana C Stern; Dirk W Lachenmeier
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.