A method for the preparation of aryl and heteroaryl sulfonamides using 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl chlorosulfate (TCPC) is described. The reaction of 2-pyridylzinc reagents with TCPC resulted in 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl (TCP) pyridine-2-sulfonates, and the parent pyridine-2-sulfonate was shown to react with amines. Less electron-rich aryl- and heteroarylzinc reagents reacted with TCPC to afford sulfonyl chlorides that were converted in situ to sulfonamides.
A method for the preparation of aryl and heteroaryl sulfonamides using 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl chlorosulfate (TCPC) is described. The reaction of 2-pyridylzinc reagents with TCPC resulted in 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl (TCP) pyridine-2-sulfonates, and the parent pyridine-2-sulfonate was shown to react with amines. Less electron-rich aryl- and heteroarylzinc reagents reacted with TCPC to afford sulfonyl chlorides that were converted in situ to sulfonamides.
Heterocyclic
sulfonamides are
a historically significant and still common feature in successful
pharmaceuticals and biologically active molecules,[1] yet many examples of their most straightforward synthetic
precursors, heterocyclic sulfonyl chlorides, are challenging to synthesize
and/or notoriously unstable. The development of an efficient, modular,
and general route to sulfonyl chlorides or synthetic equivalents without
using toxic, inconvenient reagents such as chlorine gas or sulfuryl
chloride is an important unsolved synthetic problem, especially from
a discovery chemistry perspective.[2] Toward
this end, our laboratory recently described a palladium-mediated synthesis
of sulfonyl chlorides using phenyl chlorosulfate[3] and a variety of commercially available arylboronic acids
(Figure 1).[4] The
sulfonyl chloride products could either be isolated or reacted with
amines to make sulfonamides in a one-pot procedure. However, 3-thienylboronic
acid and dibenzofuran-4-boronic acid were the only heteroaryl nucleophiles
for which this method could be employed. This inefficiency was due
to either protodeboronation of the heteroarylboronic acid nucleophiles[5] or the thermal instability of the electron-deficient
heteroaryl sulfonyl chloride products, which in many cases readily
decompose at room temperature to give the corresponding chloroheteroarenes
and sulfur dioxide.[6]
Figure 1
Synthesis of aryl and
heteroaryl sulfonyl chlorides and sulfonate
esters with 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl chlorosulfate (TCPC).
Synthesis of aryl and
heteroaryl sulfonyl chlorides and sulfonate
esters with 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl chlorosulfate (TCPC).Many other researchers have contributed to the
synthesis of sulfonamides
in recent years. Explored by the groups of Willis[7] and Wu,[8] an approach to sulfonamides
using 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane bis(sulfur dioxide) adduct (DABSO)
and a Pd catalyst has been successful with some heterocycles. However,
these protocols are mostly limited to iodoarenes and exclusively access N-aminosulfonamide products. Wu recently described the reaction
of aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborates with DABSO to form sulfonamides,
but no heterocyclic examples were reported, and this reaction also
was limited N-amino products.[9] A useful approach targets the more stable sulfinate functional group,
which can be oxidized to form sulfonyl chlorides (Figure 1).[10] Organolithium,[10c] organomagnesium,[10b,10c,10h,10i] and organozinc[10g] reagents can be reacted
with SO2 or SO2 surrogates like DABSO to form
sulfinates directly, or aryl halides can be converted to sulfinates
in the presence of an SO2 surrogate and a Pd catalyst.
However, relatively few heterocyclic sulfonamides have been prepared
using either of these sulfinate strategies. Notably, sulfinates must
be oxidized to form sulfonyl chlorides, so methods that access them
require an oxidation step to reach sulfonamide products. Although
examples of aryl sulfonate esters as shelf-stable alternatives to
thermally unstable heterocyclic sulfonyl chlorides have been reported,
these compounds are still prepared by using the unstable sulfonyl
chlorides in question (Figure 1).[11]With the challenge of preparing heterocyclic
sulfonamides still
remaining, we aimed to increase the scope of our previous chemistry.
In this paper, we describe the preparation of aryl and heteroaryl
sulfonamides using 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl chlorosulfate (TCPC)[12] and aryl- and heteroarylzinc reagents. Upon
reaction with organozinc reagents, this electrophile generates intermediates
at the sulfonyl chloride oxidation state that can be directly coupled
with amines.Substituting organozinc reagents for boronic acids
has been a powerful
and general strategy to enable cross-coupling reactions of heteroaryl
carbon nucleophiles,[13] and the same strategy
was proposed for the synthesis of sulfonyl chlorides. This tactic,
as in previous endeavors, was in part meant to circumvent the aforementioned
protodeboronation problems associated with the corresponding Suzuki–Miyaura
coupling reactions of heteroarylboronates.[14] Additionally, initial experiments revealed that organozinc reagents
react with aryl chlorosulfates directly, without a transition-metal
catalyst (Scheme 1).[15]
Scheme 1
TCPC Exhibits Two Modes of Reactivity
In preliminary investigations, two modes of reactivity
were observed.
Allowing 2-pyridylzinc bromide (1) to react with TCPC
afforded a 75% yield of 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl (TCP) pyridine-2-sulfonate
(4a). This product suggests a change of leaving group
preference for TCPC when it reacts with the 2-pyridylzinc reagent
compared with what we observed in the Pd-catalyzed reaction with arylboronic
acids and phenyl chlorosulfate[4] and with
the reactivity of aryl chlorosulfates in general.[3] We believe that such a change is unlikely, and instead
we propose that although 2,4,6-trichlorophenoxide 3 leaves
upon attack of TCPC by the organozinc reagent, an equivalent of the
liberated phenoxide subsequently traps the highly reactive pyridine-2-sulfonyl
chloride (2).[16] This proposed
mechanism is consistent with the known reactivities of both aryl chlorosulfates
and the electrophile 2.In contrast, combining
TCPC and 2-thienylzinc bromide (5) afforded thiophene-2-sulfonyl
chloride (6) (observed
by GC), which was treated in situ with excess dimethylamine to afford
sulfonamide 7. This further substantiates the proposed
mechanism of preferential displacement of 2,4,6-trichlorophenoxide
over the chloride. Sulfonyl chloride 6 is more stable
than 2 and was not observed to react with the phenoxide
under these conditions.The formation of 4a was
surprising but quite advantageous.
While pyridine-2-sulfonyl chloride 2 is very unstable,
the TCP esters could be stored at room temperature for months without
significant decomposition and were isolated by flash chromatography
on silica gel. We chose TCPC over phenyl chlorosulfate for this work
because TCP sulfonates are more reactive electrophiles than phenyl
sulfonates. Caddick has shown that perfluorophenyl and TCP sulfonates
are solid, stable, and sufficiently reactive electrophiles that can
be used as sulfonyl chloride surrogates.[11a−11d] While Caddick’s methods were only extended to a few heteroarylsulfonyl
electrophiles, Kristensen further demonstrated that perfluorophenyl
sulfonates of electron-deficient heteroarenes are stable alternatives
to the corresponding unstable sulfonyl chlorides.[11e] However, perfluorophenyl chlorosulfate decomposed when
we attempted to purify it by silica gel chromatography and was not
pursued in light of our success with TCPC.We were able to generate
a series of TCP pyridine-2-sulfonates
(Scheme 2), and minimal optimization was required
to determine the described reaction conditions. A 1:1 ratio of organozinc
reagent to TCPC afforded satisfactory yields of the desired esters.
The parent substrate 4a was prepared on a 20 mmol scale
with no additional difficulty. Several substituted pyridines were
used, all isolated as solids that were stable in air on the lab bench
(4b–e). While our laboratory and
others have generally found that magnesium–halogen exchange
is preferable to lithium–halogen exchange in the preparation
of 2-pyridylzinc for Negishi cross-coupling reactions,[13,17] 2-pyridylzinc mixtures prepared from Grignard reagents consistently
afforded lower yields of the sulfonate esters when reacted with TCPC.
This is seen in the yield of 4b, where the only successful
method for preparing the 2-pyrimidinylzinc reagent was by use of magnesium–iodine
exchange.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of 2,4,6-Trichlorophenyl Pyridine-2-sulfonates
from 2-Pyridylzinc
Reagents and TCPC
Reaction conditions: HetArBr
(1.0 mmol), n-BuLi (1.0 mmol), ZnCl2 (1.0
mmol), TCPC (1.0 mmol). The reported isolated yields are averages
of two runs.
Synthesis of 2,4,6-Trichlorophenyl Pyridine-2-sulfonates
from 2-Pyridylzinc
Reagents and TCPC
Reaction conditions: HetArBr
(1.0 mmol), n-BuLi (1.0 mmol), ZnCl2 (1.0
mmol), TCPC (1.0 mmol). The reported isolated yields are averages
of two runs.Reaction conditions:
2-iodopyrimidine (1.0 mmol), i-PrMgCl·LiCl (1.0
mmol), ZnCl2 (1.0 mmol), TCPC (1.0 mmol).To demonstrate the utility of TCP pyridine-2-sulfonates, 4a was converted to N-alkyl and N-aryl sulfonamides in good yields (Scheme 3). The ester is not as reactive as pyridine-2-sulfonyl chloride,
and while this imparts the benefit of bench stability, more vigorous
conditions are required in order to react this electrophile with amines.
Heating to 60 °C was sufficient for ammonia and alkylamines (8a–d), but strong base (LHMDS) was required
for N-aryl- and N-heteroarylamines
(8e–h).
Scheme 3
Preparation of Pyridine-2-sulfonamides
The reported isolated yields
are averages of two runs.
The reported isolated yields
are averages of two runs.Reaction conditions: 4a (1.0 mmol), 56% aqueous NH4OH (2 mL), 1 h.Reaction conditions: 4a (1.0 mmol), amine (2.0 mmol).Reaction conditions: 4a (1.0 mmol), amine (2.0 mmol), LHMDS (2.0 mmol).Reaction conditions: 4a (1.0 mmol), amine (1.2 mmol), LHMDS (1.2 mmol).We then showed that the scope of TCPC with less electron-deficient
aryl- and heteroarylzinc reagents is quite broad (Scheme 4). Of note, sterically encumbered arylzinc reagents
represent suitable nucleophiles for the sulfonylation reaction (9a and 9b). Sulfonamides attached at the 2- and
3-positions of pyrazole were both prepared in useful yields (9c and 9d), as well as two thiophene-based sulfonamides
(9e and 9f). Lastly, three examples of electron-rich
five-membered heterocycles were converted to sulfonamides (9g–i).
Scheme 4
Preparation of (Hetero)aryl Sulfonamides
with Organozinc Reagents
and TCPC via Sulfonyl Chlorides
Reaction
conditions: (Het)Ar–H/Br
(1.0 mmol), n-BuLi (1.0 mmol), ZnCl2 (1.0
mmol), TCPC (1.0 mmol), amine (2.0 mmol). The reported isolated yields
are averages of two runs.
Same as the general procedure, except that TCPC was added at −78
°C with subsequent warming to rt overnight.
Preparation of (Hetero)aryl Sulfonamides
with Organozinc Reagents
and TCPC via Sulfonyl Chlorides
Reaction
conditions: (Het)Ar–H/Br
(1.0 mmol), n-BuLi (1.0 mmol), ZnCl2 (1.0
mmol), TCPC (1.0 mmol), amine (2.0 mmol). The reported isolated yields
are averages of two runs.Same as the general procedure, except that TCPC was added at −78
°C with subsequent warming to rt overnight.The underexplored reagent TCPC has been shown to facilitate a new
and convenient way to prepare aryl and heteroaryl sulfonyl chlorides.
No transition-metal catalyst is required for the reaction, and using
organozinc reagents enabled the functionalization of heterocycles.
A broad range of amines and electron-rich (hetero)arylzinc reagents
were suitable coupling partners, enabling the rapid synthesis of a
diverse set of sulfonamides. TCPC also allowed for the preparation
of TCP pyridine-2-sulfonates, bench-stable alternatives to pyridine-2-sulfonyl
chlorides that are still reactive with both alkyl- and arylamines.
For both classes of heterocycles, these protocols take advantage of
the modularity of the sulfonamide functional group when generating
molecular diversity. This modularity and the operational simplicity
of the procedures described herein suggest that TCPC may serve as
a useful and practical reagent in drug discovery or medicinal chemistry
efforts.
Authors: Miles W Johnson; Scott W Bagley; Neal P Mankad; Robert G Bergman; Vincent Mascitti; F Dean Toste Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: James R Colombe; Sebastian Bernhardt; Christos Stathakis; Stephen L Buchwald; Paul Knochel Journal: Org Lett Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 6.005
Authors: Jonathan D Wilden; Lynsey Geldeard; Chieh C Lee; Duncan B Judd; Stephen Caddick Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2006-12-21 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Benjamin N Rocke; Kevin B Bahnck; Michael Herr; Sophie Lavergne; Vincent Mascitti; Christian Perreault; Jana Polivkova; Andrei Shavnya Journal: Org Lett Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 6.005