C Chun Chen1, Jerome Waser. 1. Laboratory of Catalysis and Organic Synthesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne , EPFL SB ISIC LCSO, BCH 4306, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Abstract
A one-pot three-component protocol for the preparation of arylsulfonyl alkynes through the reaction of ethynyl-benziodoxolone (EBX) reagents, DABSO (DABCO·SO2), and either organomagnesium reagents or aryl iodides with a palladium catalyst is reported. A broad range of aryl and heteroarylalkynyl sulfones were obtained in 46-85% overall yield.
A one-pot three-component protocol for the preparation of arylsulfonyl alkynes through the reaction of ethynyl-benziodoxolone (EBX) reagents, DABSO (DABCO·SO2), and either organomagnesium reagents or aryl iodides with a palladium catalyst is reported. A broad range of aryl and heteroarylalkynyl sulfones were obtained in 46-85% overall yield.
Aryl sulfone-containing compounds
display a variety of biological activities. Several of them are marketed
drugs for treatment of human diseases. Examples include the antimigraine
Vioxx (1),[1a] the antibacterial
Dapsone (2)[1b] and the antiandrogen
Casodex (3)[1c] (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Biologically active aryl sulfones.
Biologically active aryl sulfones.Among all sulfones, (aryl)alkynyl sulfones constitute an
important
class of building blocks due to their versatile reactivity. The sulfonyl
unit has a strong electron-withdrawing character that enhances the
reactivity of the triple bond.[2] Therefore,
sulfonyl acetylenes are widely utilized in cycloadditions and conjugate
additions reactions. They were also found to react in certain cases
with organometallic reagents or radicals through 1,3-addition to generate
anions or radical intermediates, followed by an elimination of the
sulfonyl group to give disubstituted alkynes.[3]Up to now, the preparation of sulfones could be achieved by
numerous
approaches, the most frequent one being the oxidation of the corresponding
thiols.[4] Another convenient method is based
on the reaction of sulfinate salts with electrophiles.[5] If the introduction of an aryl or an alkynyl group is desired
on the sulfinate, hypervalent iodine reagents have emerged as reagents
of choice, due to their exceptional reactivity.[6] For example, Manolikakes and co-workers reported that diaryl
sulfones could be synthesized from arylsulfinate and diaryliodonium
salts (Scheme 1A, eq 1).[7] Electrophilic alkynyl iodonium salts are also widely used
in alkynylation reactions,[8] and their utilization
for the preparation of alkynyl sulfones from sulfinate salts were
reported by the groups of Stang[9] and Moran
(Scheme 1A, eq 2).[10] However, the scope of arylsulfinate salts reported was limited (only
PhSO2Na and p-TolSO2Na), probably
due to the low number of commercially available sulfinate salts. Recently,
Willis and co-workers showed that DABSO (DABCO·SO2, the combination of DABCO and sulfur dioxide) can serve as a surrogate
of SO2 for the in situ formation of sulfinate salts in
the synthesis of sulfonamides.[11] More importantly,
Willis and co-workers[12] and Rocke and co-workers[13] independently demonstrated a one-pot synthesis
of sulfones from organolithium/magnesium and organozinc reagents,
DABSO, and alkyl halides (Scheme 1B, eq 3).
In addition, transition metal-catalyzed, e.g. palladium[14] (eq 4) and gold,[15] as well as metal-free[16] sulfinate salt
formation with DABSO were also reported for sulfone synthesis. These
recent breakthroughs have greatly simplified the synthesis of sulfones.
However, a one-pot protocol for the preparation of arylalkynyl sulfones
has still not been reported. The synthesis of this class of compounds
is especially challenging, as the products themselves are also highly
reactive.
Scheme 1
Recent Reports on Sulfone Synthesis
Our group is interested in alkyne synthesis
using electrophilic
alkynylation reagents, in particular ethynyl-benziodoxolones (EBX, 4).[17,18] These cyclic hypervalent iodine
reagents display high reactivity, but are more stable than the traditionally
used alkynyliodonium salts. We therefore thought they would be well-suited
to develop the first one-pot three-component synthesis of alkynyl
sulfones. Herein we would like to present the successful implementation
of this approach using EBX reagents 4, DABSO, and organomagnesium/lithium
reagents or aryl iodides with a palladium catalyst (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
Our Approach toward the Synthesis of Alkynyl
Sulfones
The preparation of
sulfonyl alkynes starting from tolyl magnesium
bromide (5a) with TIPS-EBX (4a) and DABSO
was examined first. Initially, the protocol developed by Willis for
preparation of sulfonamides[11a] was utilized.
Unfortunately, the desired product was not obtained when using THF
only as solvent. To our delight, 16% yield of 6a was
observed when THF was removed and replaced by DMF (Table 1, entry 1).
Table 1
Optimization of the
Arylalkynyl Sulfone
Synthesis
entrya
equiv of 4a
solvent
t
yield (%)d
1
1.2
DMFb
2 h
16
2
1.2
DMFb
14 h
0
3
1.2
DMF/H2Ob,c
2 h
15
4
1.2
DMF/H2Ob,c
14 h
0
5
1.2
DMF
2 h
65
6
1.2
DMSO
2 h
0
7
1.5
DMF
2 h
50
8
1.5
DMF
1 h
50
9
1.5
DMF
30 min
75
10
1.5
DMF
5 min
78
11
1.2
DMF
5 min
80
12
1.1
DMF
5 min
75
0.06 mmol p-tolylmagnesium
bromide (5a) was used in 0.2 mL of THF. 0.2 mL of solvent
was added for the second step (final concentration: 0.13 M).
THF was removed before adding 0.2
mL of solvent (final concentration: 0.3 M).
Ratio (v/v) =
5/1.
The yield was obtained
based on 1H NMR analysis using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene
as internal reference.
0.06 mmol p-tolylmagnesium
bromide (5a) was used in 0.2 mL of THF. 0.2 mL of solvent
was added for the second step (final concentration: 0.13 M).THF was removed before adding 0.2
mL of solvent (final concentration: 0.3 M).Ratio (v/v) =
5/1.The yield was obtained
based on 1H NMR analysis using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene
as internal reference.Longer
reaction time (14 h), and DMF/H2O (v/v = 5/1) as a solvent system for the alkynylation
did not give better results (Table 1, entries
2–4). On the other hand, we were pleased to observe an increased
yield of 6a (65%) when THF was not removed before adding
DMF for the alkynylation step (Table 1, entry
5). In contrast, the addition of DMSO was not successful (Table 1, entry 6). A fast examination of TIPS-EBX 4a loading and reaction time (Table 1, entries 6–12) showed that 1.2 equiv of 4a and
5 min reaction time resulted in the production of 6a in
80% yield (Table 1, entry 11). The lower yields
observed with longer reaction times are probably due to the high reactivity
of the formed alkynyl sulfone 6a.With optimized
conditions in hand we examined the scope of the
one-pot sulfinylation alkynylation from organometallic reagents with
TIPS-EBX 4a (Scheme 3). Acetylene 6a was obtained in good yield on preparative scale (85%).
We further expanded the utility of this protocol by preparing the
organomagnesium/lithium reagents immediately before use. Phenylalkynyl
sulfone 6b could be synthesized in 85% overall yield
starting from bromobenzene 5b. Other electron-rich and
electron-poor functional groups were well-tolerated. For example, p-tert-butyl, p-methoxy,
and p-dimethylaminosulfonyl alkynes 6c, 6d, and 6e were obtained in good yields
(79, 79, and 85% respectively). p-Chloro and p-fluorophenylsulfonyl alkynes 6f, and 6g were also synthesized in 70 and 85% yield, respectively.
Scheme 3
Scope of the One-Pot Sulfinylation Alkynylation
Reaction conditions: 0.20 mmol
of 5 (1.0 equiv), 0.20 mmol of Mg (1.0 equiv), 0.20 mmol
of DABSO (1.0 equiv), and THF (0.65 mL) were used for the first step.
0.24 mmol of TIPS-EBX 4a (1.2 equiv) and DMF (0.65 mL)
were added for the second step. Isolated yield after purification
on column chromatography is given.
Commercial Grignard reagent was used.
0.5 M organometallic reagent in THF.
R-Li was generated from the corresponding C–H
bond with n-BuLi.
Commercial n-BuLi was used.
Scope of the One-Pot Sulfinylation Alkynylation
Reaction conditions: 0.20 mmol
of 5 (1.0 equiv), 0.20 mmol of Mg (1.0 equiv), 0.20 mmol
of DABSO (1.0 equiv), and THF (0.65 mL) were used for the first step.
0.24 mmol of TIPS-EBX 4a (1.2 equiv) and DMF (0.65 mL)
were added for the second step. Isolated yield after purification
on column chromatography is given.Commercial Grignard reagent was used.0.5 M organometallic reagent in THF.R-Li was generated from the corresponding C–H
bond with n-BuLi.Commercial n-BuLi was used.o-Tolyl sulfinate magnesium salt gave a lower
yield of product 6h (52%). In addition, alkyne 6i was also obtained from 1-bromonaphthalene in 83% yield.
The heteroaryl bromides5-bromo-N-methylindole (5j) and 2-bromo-thiophene (5k) gave products 6j and 6k in 72 and 79% yield, respectively.
Sulfone 6l was synthesized in 70% yield starting from
furan 5l using a selective lithiation at C2. However,
2-pyridinyl and 2-pyrimidinyl alkynyl sulfones 6m and 6n could not be synthesized using this one-pot protocol. Allylsulfonyl
alkyne 6o was obtained in 46% yield. Sulfones 6p and 6q could not be obtained when starting from the
corresponding organolithium reagents.Further extension of the
scope of the one-pot sulfonyl alkynylation
was focused on p-tolyl Grignard (5a)
with R-EBX reagents (Scheme 4). Alkyne 7a was made in 79% yield using t-Bu-EBX 4b.[18f] Unfortunately, Me-EBX 4c,[18k] Ph-EBX 4d,[18f] and n-Hex-EBX 4e(18f) were not able to react with the in
situ formed p-tolyl sulfinate salt to deliver the
desired alkynes 7b, 7c, and 7d respectively. Interestingly, dihydrofuran 8 was obtained
in 93% yield when the EBX reagent 4f was utilized in
the alkynylation.
Scheme 4
Iodine Reagent Scope of the One-Pot Sulfinylation
Alkynylation
Reaction conditions: 0.20 mmol
of p-tolylMgBr (5a) (1.0 equiv), 0.20
mmol of DABSO (1.0 equiv) and THF (0.65 mL) were used for the first
step. 0.24 mmol of R-EBX 4 (1.2 equiv) and DMF (0.65
mL) were added for the second step. Isolated yield after purification
on column chromatography is given.
Iodine Reagent Scope of the One-Pot Sulfinylation
Alkynylation
Reaction conditions: 0.20 mmol
of p-tolylMgBr (5a) (1.0 equiv), 0.20
mmol of DABSO (1.0 equiv) and THF (0.65 mL) were used for the first
step. 0.24 mmol of R-EBX 4 (1.2 equiv) and DMF (0.65
mL) were added for the second step. Isolated yield after purification
on column chromatography is given.At least
three different mechanisms could be considered for the
alkynylation step in this one-pot protocol. A first possibility frequently
occurring with hypervalent iodine reagents is direct nucleophilic
attack of sulfinate onto the iodine atom of the benziodoxolone, followed
by a C–S bond formation via a reductive elimination step.[6] Our group has recently discovered by computation
an alternative mechanism for the alkynylation of thiols involving
a concerted three-atom transition state including the iodine, the
sulfur and the α-carbon atom of the alkyne.[18k] However, these two mechanisms are less likely to be involved
in the alkynylation of sulfinates because (i) dihydrofuran 8 was obtained and this product most probably results from 1,5-C–H
insertion of a carbene intermediate, and (ii) EBX reagents 4c–f did not give the desired alkyne products,
in contrast to the high yields observed with thiols.[18k] These facts suggest that the reaction mechanism is different
for sulfinates and most probably involves a third alternative: a conjugate
addition of the sulfinate onto the β-alkynyl carbon of ethynyl-benziodoxolone,
followed by an α-elimination of the aryl iodide to give a carbene
intermediate, and finally a 1,2-shift to form the alkyne.[10,19]One disadvantage of the developed sulfonylation-alkynylation
protocol
involving organo-magnesium or -lithium reagents is that it cannot
be applied to substrates sensitive to strong bases or nucleophiles.
In order to further enhance the generality of the one-pot approach
for the synthesis of alkynyl sulfones, we then examined a Pd-catalyzed
ammonium sulfinate salt formation starting from aryl iodides which
can proceed under much milder conditions (Scheme 1B, eq 4).[14] Alkynes 6a (82%) and 6d (68%) could be synthesized in comparable
yields using the Pd-catalyzed sulfinylation in the first step (Scheme 5). Gratifyingly, alkynes 6r, 6s and 6t bearing potentially base- and nucleophile
sensitive hydroxy, methyl ester, and methyl ketone groups were synthesized
successfully in 39–60% yield.
Scheme 5
Scope of the Pd-Catalyzed
One-Pot Sulfinylation Alkynylation
Reaction
conditions: 0.20 mmol
of ArI 9 (1.0 equiv), 10 μmol of Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), 15 μmol of PAd2Bu (7.5 mol %), 0.20
mmol DABSO (1.0 equiv), Et3N (3.0 equiv) and iPrOH (1.7 mL) were used for the first step. 0.24 mmol of TIPS-EBX 4a (1.2 equiv) and DMF (0.65 mL) were used for the second
step. Isolated yield after purification on column chromatography is
given.
Scope of the Pd-Catalyzed
One-Pot Sulfinylation Alkynylation
Reaction
conditions: 0.20 mmol
of ArI 9 (1.0 equiv), 10 μmol of Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), 15 μmol of PAd2Bu (7.5 mol %), 0.20
mmol DABSO (1.0 equiv), Et3N (3.0 equiv) and iPrOH (1.7 mL) were used for the first step. 0.24 mmol of TIPS-EBX 4a (1.2 equiv) and DMF (0.65 mL) were used for the second
step. Isolated yield after purification on column chromatography is
given.In conclusion, we report a simple one-pot
protocol for sulfonylation-alkynylation
starting either from organomagnesium/lithium reagents or from aryl
iodides with a palladium catalyst, DABSO, and EBX reagents, in up
to 85% overall yield. The method from organomagnesium/lithium reagents
gives an unprecedented efficient access to aryl-alkynyl sulfones bearing
benzene rings with electron-poor or electron-rich substituents, as
well as heterocycles. The complementary Pd-catalyzed protocol can
be used for substrates sensitive to the use of strongly basic or nucleophilic
organometallic reagents. Extension of the scope and investigations
on the mechanism of the sulfonyl alkynylation are currently underway
and will be reported in due course.
Authors: Miles W Johnson; Scott W Bagley; Neal P Mankad; Robert G Bergman; Vincent Mascitti; F Dean Toste Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Leyre Marzo; Ignacio Pérez; Francisco Yuste; José Alemán; José Luis García Ruano Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: P Prasit; Z Wang; C Brideau; C C Chan; S Charleson; W Cromlish; D Ethier; J F Evans; A W Ford-Hutchinson; J Y Gauthier; R Gordon; J Guay; M Gresser; S Kargman; B Kennedy; Y Leblanc; S Léger; J Mancini; G P O'Neill; M Ouellet; M D Percival; H Perrier; D Riendeau; I Rodger; R Zamboni Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 1999-07-05 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Benjamin N Rocke; Kevin B Bahnck; Michael Herr; Sophie Lavergne; Vincent Mascitti; Christian Perreault; Jana Polivkova; Andrei Shavnya Journal: Org Lett Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 6.005