Literature DB >> 20153197

A negative feedback signal that is triggered by peril curbs honey bee recruitment.

James C Nieh1.   

Abstract

Decision making in superorganisms such as honey bee colonies often uses self-organizing behaviors, feedback loops that allow the colony to gather information from multiple individuals and achieve reliable and agile solutions. Honey bees use positive feedback from the waggle dance to allocate colony foraging effort. However, the use of negative feedback signals by superorganisms is poorly understood. I show that conspecific attacks at a food source lead to the production of stop signals, communication that was known to reduce waggle dancing and recruitment but lacked a clear natural trigger. Signalers preferentially targeted nestmates visiting the same food source, on the basis of its odor. During aggressive food competition, attack victims increased signal production by 43 fold. Foragers that attacked competitors or experienced no aggression did not alter signal production. Biting ambush predators also attack foragers at flowers. Simulated biting of foragers or exposure to bee alarm pheromone also elicited signaling (88-fold and 14-fold increases, respectively). This provides the first clear evidence of a negative feedback signal elicited by foraging peril to counteract the positive feedback of the waggle dance. As in intra- and intercellular communication, negative feedback may play an important, though currently underappreciated, role in self-organizing behaviors within superorganisms. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20153197     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  33 in total

1.  Negative feedback from maternal signals reduces false alarms by collectively signalling offspring.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hamel; Reginald B Cocroft
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Modeling the Adaptive Role of Negative Signaling in Honey Bee Intraspecific Competition.

Authors:  Brian R Johnson; James C Nieh
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 1.309

3.  Ants adjust their pheromone deposition to a changing environment and their probability of making errors.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; Jürgen Heinze
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The computational stance in biology.

Authors:  C C Wood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Negative feedback in ants: crowding results in less trail pheromone deposition.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; Christoph Grüter; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) use social information as an indicator of safety in dangerous environments.

Authors:  Erika H Dawson; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Negative feedback: ants choose unoccupied over occupied food sources and lay more pheromone to them.

Authors:  Stephanie Wendt; Nico Kleinhoelting; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  An alarm pheromone modulates appetitive olfactory learning in the honeybee (apis mellifera).

Authors:  Elodie Urlacher; Bernard Francés; Martin Giurfa; Jean-Marc Devaud
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Desert ants achieve reliable recruitment across noisy interactions.

Authors:  Nitzan Razin; Jean-Pierre Eckmann; Ofer Feinerman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  Individual versus collective cognition in social insects.

Authors:  Ofer Feinerman; Amos Korman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.