Literature DB >> 26061889

On the moments of Cochran's Q statistic under the null hypothesis, with application to the meta-analysis of risk difference.

Elena Kulinskaya1, Michael B Dollinger2, Kirsten Bjørkestøl3.   

Abstract

W. G. Cochran's Q statistic was introduced in 1937 to test for equality of means under heteroscedasticity. Today, the use of Q is widespread in tests for homogeneity of effects in meta-analysis, but often these effects (such as risk differences and odds ratios) are not normally distributed. It is common to assume that Q follows a chi-square distribution, but it has long been known that this asymptotic distribution for Q is not accurate for moderate sample sizes. In this paper, the effect and weight for an individual study may depend on two parameters: the effect and a nuisance parameter. We present expansions for the first two moments of Q without any normality assumptions. Our expansions will have wide applicability in testing for homogeneity in meta-analysis. As an important example, we present a homogeneity test when the effects are the differences of risks between treatment and control arms of the several studies-a test which is substantially more accurate than that currently used. In this situation, we approximate the distribution of Q with a gamma distribution. We provide the results of simulations to verify the accuracy of our proposal and an example of a meta-analysis of medical data.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  gamma distribution; heterogeneity test; nuisance parameter; weighted analysis of variance; weighted sum of squares

Year:  2011        PMID: 26061889     DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Synth Methods        ISSN: 1759-2879            Impact factor:   5.273


  10 in total

1.  Meta-analytic approaches for examining complexity and heterogeneity in studies of adolescent development.

Authors:  Nicholas J Parr; Maria L Schweer-Collins; Todd M Darlington; Emily E Tanner-Smith
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2019-11-15

2.  Meta-Analysis in Sociological Research: Power and Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Guangyu Tong; Guang Guo
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2019-11-20

3.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited.

Authors:  Rebecca DerSimonian; Nan Laird
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  An accurate test for homogeneity of odds ratios based on Cochran's Q-statistic.

Authors:  Elena Kulinskaya; Michael B Dollinger
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Paule-Mandel estimators for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Martin Law; Andrea C Tricco; Rose Baker
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.273

Review 6.  When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Ian R White
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Approximate confidence intervals for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Jack Bowden; Rose Baker
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.273

8.  Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails?

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Jack Bowden
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Dan Jackson; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Ralf Bender; Jack Bowden; Guido Knapp; Oliver Kuss; Julian P T Higgins; Dean Langan; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.273

10.  Association of Short-Term Exposure to Meteorological Factors and Risk of Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhihui Liu; Yongna Meng; Hao Xiang; Yuanan Lu; Suyang Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.