Literature DB >> 35754525

Meta-Analysis in Sociological Research: Power and Heterogeneity.

Guangyu Tong1, Guang Guo2.   

Abstract

Meta-analysis is a statistical method that combines quantitative findings from previous studies. It has been increasingly used to obtain more credible results in a wide range of scientific fields. Combining the results of relevant studies allows researchers to leverage study similarities while modeling potential sources of between-study heterogeneity. This paper provides a review of the core methodologies of meta-analysis that we consider most relevant to sociological research. After developing the foundation of the fixed-effects and random-effects models of meta-analysis, this paper illustrates the utility of the method with regression coefficients reported from two sets of social science studies. We explain the various steps of the process including constructing the meta-sample from primary studies; estimating the fixed- and random-effects models; analyzing the source of heterogeneity across studies; assessing publication bias. We conclude with a discussion of steps that could be taken to strengthen the development of meta-analysis in sociological research, which will eventually increase the credibility of sociological inquiry via a knowledge-cumulative process.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 35754525      PMCID: PMC9231456          DOI: 10.1177/0049124119882479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Methods Res        ISSN: 0049-1241


  61 in total

1.  Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses.

Authors:  A J Sutton; S J Duval; R L Tweedie; K R Abrams; D R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-10

2.  Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Duval; R Tweedie
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression.

Authors:  Hans C van Houwelingen; Lidia R Arends; Theo Stijnen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

5.  Sexual possibility situations and sexual behaviors among young adolescents: the moderating role of protective factors.

Authors:  Colleen DiLorio; William N Dudley; Johanna E Soet; Frances McCarty
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 6.  Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews.

Authors:  R J McManus; S Wilson; B C Delaney; D A Fitzmaurice; C J Hyde; R S Tobias; S Jowett; F D Hobbs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-12-05

7.  Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta-analysis.

Authors:  T D Stanley; Hristos Doucouliagos
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Generational status and social factors predicting initiation of partnered sexual activity among Latino/a youth.

Authors:  Patricia Cabral; Jan L Wallander; Anna V Song; Marc N Elliott; Susan R Tortolero; Sari L Reisner; Mark A Schuster
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Early sexual initiation: the role of peer norms.

Authors:  S B Kinsman; D Romer; F F Furstenberg; D F Schwarz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Friends' influence on adolescents' first sexual intercourse.

Authors:  Renee E Sieving; Marla E Eisenberg; Sandra Pettingell; Carol Skay
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2006-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.