Literature DB >> 26061775

Developing a phenomenological model of the proton trajectory within a heterogeneous medium required for proton imaging.

Charles-Antoine Collins Fekete1, Paul Doolan, Marta F Dias, Luc Beaulieu, Joao Seco.   

Abstract

To develop an accurate phenomenological model of the cubic spline path estimate of the proton path, accounting for the initial proton energy and water equivalent thickness (WET) traversed. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were used to calculate the path of protons crossing various WET (10-30 cm) of different material (LN300, water and CB2-50% CaCO3) for a range of initial energies (180-330 MeV). For each MC trajectory, cubic spline trajectories (CST) were constructed based on the entrance and exit information of the protons and compared with the MC using the root mean square (RMS) metric. The CST path is dependent on the direction vector magnitudes (|P0,1|). First, |P0,1| is set to the proton path length (with factor Λ(Norm)(0,1) = 1.0). Then, two optimal factor Λ(0,1) are introduced in |P0,1|. The factors are varied to minimize the RMS difference with MC paths for every configuration. A set of Λ(opt)(0,1) factors, function of WET/water equivalent path length (WEPL), that minimizes the RMS are presented. MTF analysis is then performed on proton radiographs of a line-pair phantom reconstructed using the CST trajectories. Λ(opt)(0,1) was fitted to the WET/WEPL ratio using a quadratic function (Y = A + BX(2) where A = 1.01,0.99, B = 0.43,-  0.46 respectively for Λ(opt)(0), Λ(opt)(1)). The RMS deviation calculated along the path, between the CST and the MC, increases with the WET. The increase is larger when using Λ(Norm)(0,1) than Λ(opt)(0,1) (difference of 5.0% with WET/WEPL = 0.66). For 230/330 MeV protons, the MTF10% was found to increase by 40/16% respectively for a thin phantom (15 cm) when using the Λ(opt)(0,1) model compared to the Λ(Norm)(0,1) model. Calculation times for Λ(opt)(0,1) are scaled down compared to MLP and RMS deviation are similar within standard deviation.B ased on the results of this study, using CST with the Λ(opt)(0,1) factors reduces the RMS deviation and increases the spatial resolution when reconstructing proton trajectories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26061775     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/13/5071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  An Improved Method of Total Variation Superiorization Applied to Reconstruction in Proton Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Blake Schultze; Yair Censor; Paniz Karbasi; Keith E Schubert; Reinhard W Schulte
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  A novel proton-integrating radiography system design using a monolithic scintillator detector: experimental studies.

Authors:  Chinmay D Darne; Daniel G Robertson; Fahed Alsanea; Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.455

3.  The accuracy of helium ion CT based particle therapy range prediction: an experimental study comparing different particle and x-ray CT modalities.

Authors:  L Volz; C-A Collins-Fekete; E Bär; S Brons; C Graeff; R P Johnson; A Runz; C Sarosiek; R W Schulte; J Seco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Stopping power accuracy and achievable spatial resolution of helium ion imaging using a prototype particle CT detector system.

Authors:  Lennart Volz; Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete; Pierluigi Piersimoni; Robert P Johnson; Vladimir Bashkirov; Reinhard Schulte; Joao Seco
Journal:  Curr Dir Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-07

5.  A proton imaging system using a volumetric liquid scintillator: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Chinmay D Darne; Fahed Alsanea; Daniel G Robertson; Fada Guan; Tinsu Pan; David Grosshans; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2019-07-12

6.  An inhomogeneous most likely path formalism for proton computed tomography.

Authors:  Mark D Brooke; Scott N Penfold
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Helium ion beam imaging for image guided ion radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Martišíková; T Gehrke; S Berke; G Aricò; O Jäkel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.