Literature DB >> 26060121

Clinical impact and evolution of mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis.

Luis Nombela-Franco1, Hélène Eltchaninoff2, Ralf Zahn3, Luca Testa4, Martin B Leon5, Ramiro Trillo-Nouche6, Augusto D'Onofrio, Augusto D Onofrio7, Craig R Smith5, John Webb8, Sabine Bleiziffer9, Benedetta De Chiara10, Martine Gilard11, Corrado Tamburino12, Francesco Bedogni4, Marco Barbanti12, Stefano Salizzoni13, Bruno García del Blanco14, Manel Sabaté15, Antonella Moreo10, Cristina Fernández16, Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro17, Ignacio Amat-Santos17, Marina Urena17, Ricardo Allende17, Eulogio García16, Carlos Macaya16, Eric Dumont17, Philippe Pibarot17, Josep Rodés-Cabau17.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common entity in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but its influence on outcomes remains controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the clinical impact of and changes in significant (moderate-severe) MR in patients undergoing TAVR, overall and according to valve design (self-expandable (SEV) vs balloon-expandable (BEV)).
METHODS: All national registries and randomised trials were pooled using meta-analytical guidelines to establish the impact of moderate-severe MR on mortality after TAVR. Studies reporting changes in MR after TAVR on an individual level were electronically searched and used for the analysis.
RESULTS: Eight studies including 8015 patients (SEV: 3474 patients; BEV: 4492 patients) were included in the analysis. The overall 30-day and 1-year mortality was increased in patients with significant MR (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.92; HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.55, respectively), but a significant heterogeneity across studies was observed (p<0.05). The impact of MR on mortality was not different between SEV and BEV in meta-regression analysis for 30-day (p=0.360) and 1-year (p=0.388) mortality. Changes in MR over time were evaluated in nine studies including 1278 patients. Moderate-severe MR (SEV: 326 patients; BEV: 192 patients) improved in 50.5% of the patients at a median follow-up of 180 (30-360) days after TAVR, and the degree of improvement was greater in patients who had received a BEV (66.7% vs 40.8% in the SEV group, p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant moderate-severe MR was associated with increased early and late mortality following TAVR. A significant improvement in MR severity was detected in half of the patients following TAVR, and the degree of improvement was greater in those patients who had received a BEV. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26060121     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  20 in total

1.  The impact of balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement on concomitant mitral regurgitation: a comprehensive computational analysis.

Authors:  Andrés Caballero; Wenbin Mao; Raymond McKay; Wei Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and heart failure.

Authors:  Chirag Bavishi; Dhaval Kolte; Paul C Gordon; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Clinical and echocardiographic features of paradoxical low-flow and normal-flow severe aortic stenosis patients with concomitant mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Jinghao Nicholas Ngiam; Nicholas Chew; Rebecca Teng; Jonathan D Kochav; Stephanie M Kochav; Benjamin Yong-Qiang Tan; Hui Wen Sim; Ching-Hui Sia; William K F Kong; Edgar Lik Wui Tay; Tiong-Cheng Yeo; Kian-Keong Poh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Readmission rates and risk factors for readmission after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Dae Yong Park; Seokyung An; Jonathan M Hanna; Stephen Y Wang; Ana S Cruz-Solbes; Ajar Kochar; Angela M Lowenstern; John K Forrest; Yousif Ahmad; Michael Cleman; Abdulla Al Damluji; Michael G Nanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Pathophysiology and management of multivalvular disease.

Authors:  Philippe Unger; Marie-Annick Clavel; Brian R Lindman; Patrick Mathieu; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  A Glimpse into the Future: In 2020, Which Patients will Undergo TAVI or SAVR?

Authors:  Crochan J O'Sullivan; Peter Wenaweser
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-05

7.  Impact of Mitral Regurgitation on Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Crochan J O'Sullivan; David Tüller; Rainer Zbinden; Franz R Eberli
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-05

Review 8.  Is There Currently a Place for Combined Mitral and Aortic Transcatheter Interventions?

Authors:  Rodney De Palma; Crochan J O'Sullivan; Magnus Settergren
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  The Impact of Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Concomitant Functional Mitral Regurgitation: A Comprehensive Engineering Analysis.

Authors:  Andrés Caballero; Wenbin Mao; Raymond McKay; Wei Sun
Journal:  Struct Heart       Date:  2020-04-03

10.  Mitral and aortic regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Piotr Szymański; Tomasz Hryniewiecki; Maciej Dąbrowski; Danuta Sorysz; Janusz Kochman; Jan Jastrzębski; Tomasz Kukulski; Marian Zembala
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.