Literature DB >> 26059765

Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review.

Carlo Senore1, John Inadomi2, Nereo Segnan1, Cristina Bellisario1, Cesare Hassan3.   

Abstract

The study aims to review available evidence concerning effective interventions to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening acceptance. We performed a literature search of randomised trials designed to increase individuals' use of CRC screening on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. Small (≤ 100 subjects per arm) studies and those reporting results of interventions implemented before publication of the large faecal occult blood test trials were excluded. Interventions were categorised following the Continuum of Cancer Care and the PRECEDE-PROCEED models and studies were grouped by screening model (opportunistic vs organised). Multifactor interventions targeting multiple levels of care and considering factors outside the individual clinician control, represent the most effective strategy to enhance CRC screening acceptance. Removing financial barriers, implementing methods allowing a systematic contact of the whole target population, using personal invitation letters, preferably signed by the reference care provider, and reminders mailed to all non-attendees are highly effective in enhancing CRC screening acceptance. Physician reminders may support the diffusion of screening, but they can be effective only for individuals who have access to and make use of healthcare services. Educational interventions for patients and providers are effective, but the implementation of organisational measures may be necessary to favour their impact. Available evidence indicates that organised programmes allow to achieve an extensive coverage and to enhance equity of access, while maximising the health impact of screening. They provide at the same time an infrastructure allowing to achieve a more favourable cost-effectiveness profile of potentially effective strategies, which would not be sustainable in opportunistic settings. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING; COST-EFFECTIVENESS

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26059765     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  37 in total

1.  Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Bauer; Jürgen F Riemann; Thomas Seufferlein; Max Reinshagen; Stephan Hollerbach; Ulrike Haug; Susanne Unverzagt; Stephanie Boese; Madeleine Ritter-Herschbach; Patrick Jahn; Thomas Frese; Michael Harris; Margarete Landenberger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Harnessing the Question-Behavior Effect to Enhance Colorectal Cancer Screening in an mHealth Experiment.

Authors:  Lea Hagoel; Efrat Neter; Nili Stein; Gad Rennert
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Reactions to online colorectal cancer risk estimates among a nationally representative sample of adults who have never been screened.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Constance M Johnson; Sathya Amarasekara; Wei Pan; John A Updegraff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-11-15

4.  Value Of Waiving Coinsurance For Colorectal Cancer Screening In Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Elisabeth F P Peterse; Reinier G S Meester; Andrea Gini; Chyke A Doubeni; Daniel S Anderson; Franklin G Berger; Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  An innovative robotic platform for magnetically-driven painless colonoscopy.

Authors:  Federico Bianchi; Gastone Ciuti; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Alberto Arezzo; Danail Stoyanov; Sebastian Schostek; Calogero Maria Oddo; Arianna Menciassi; Paolo Dario
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-11

6.  Colorectal cancer screening: It is not time for a radical shift.

Authors:  Barbara Bielawska; Catherine Dubé
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Effect of Physician Notification Regarding Nonadherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening on Patient Participation in Fecal Immunochemical Test Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Cédric Rat; Corinne Pogu; Delphine Le Donné; Chloé Latour; Gaelle Bianco; France Nanin; Anne Cowppli-Bony; Aurélie Gaultier; Jean-Michel Nguyen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Do Primary Care Provider Strategies Improve Patient Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening?

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Rinku Sutradhar; Qing Li; Corinne Daly; Gladys N Honein-AbouHaidar; Devon P Richardson; Lisa Del Giudice; Jill Tinmouth; Lawrence Paszat; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Epidemiology of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrew R Marley; Hongmei Nan
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2016-09-30

Review 10.  CT colonography for population screening of colorectal cancer: hints from European trials.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.