Literature DB >> 29200350

Value Of Waiving Coinsurance For Colorectal Cancer Screening In Medicare Beneficiaries.

Elisabeth F P Peterse1, Reinier G S Meester2, Andrea Gini3, Chyke A Doubeni4, Daniel S Anderson5, Franklin G Berger6, Ann G Zauber7, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar8.   

Abstract

Financial barriers to colorectal cancer screening persist despite the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Medicare beneficiaries may face 20 percent coinsurance for a screening colonoscopy when the procedure includes the removal of polyps or follows a positive fecal screening test. Using an established microsimulation model, we estimated that waiving this coinsurance would result in 1.7 fewer colorectal cancer deaths (a decrease of 13 percent) and $17,000 higher colorectal cancer-related costs (an increase of 0.6 percent) for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services per 1,000 sixty-five-year-olds, assuming a 10-percentage-point increase in the rates of first colonoscopy screening, follow-up, and surveillance. If the rates did not change, waiving coinsurance would increase total costs by $51,000 (1.9 percent) per 1,000 sixty-five-year-olds. Estimated screening benefits were comparable when fecal testing was assumed to be the primary screening method. Moreover, waiving coinsurance would be cost-effective if the screening rate increased by 0.6 percentage points, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Thus, the waiver is likely to have a favorable balance of health and cost impact.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disparities; Health Economics; Health Reform; Medicare

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29200350      PMCID: PMC6067012          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  33 in total

1.  Modestly increased use of colonoscopy when copayments are waived.

Authors:  Shabnam Khatami; Lei Xuan; Rolando Roman; Song Zhang; Charles McConnel; Ethan A Halm; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Access, affordability, and insurance complexity are often worse in the United States compared to ten other countries.

Authors:  Cathy Schoen; Robin Osborn; David Squires; Michelle M Doty
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Resa M Jones; Steven H Woolf; Tina D Cunningham; Robert E Johnson; Alex H Krist; Stephen F Rothemich; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Aasma Shaukat; Steven J Mongin; Mindy S Geisser; Frank A Lederle; John H Bond; Jack S Mandel; Timothy R Church
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Janneke Wilschut; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Should colorectal cancer screening be considered in elderly persons without previous screening? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Frank van Hees; J Dik F Habbema; Reinier G Meester; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Nationwide High-deductible Health Plan Before and After the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  J Frank Wharam; Fang Zhang; Bruce E Landon; Robert LeCates; Stephen Soumerai; Dennis Ross-Degnan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  What would make getting colorectal cancer screening easier? Perspectives from screeners and nonscreeners.

Authors:  Gilda G Medina; Amy McQueen; Anthony J Greisinger; L Kay Bartholomew; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 9.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Øyvind Holme; Michael Bretthauer; Atle Fretheim; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Geir Hoff
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-01

10.  Cancer screening test use - United States, 2013.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Mary C White; Trevor D Thompson; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Data-Powered Participatory Decision Making: Leveraging Systems Thinking and Simulation to Guide Selection and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; Jennifer Leeman; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Florence K L Tangka; Melinda M Davis; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  Changes in screening colonoscopy following Medicare reimbursement and cost-sharing changes.

Authors:  Lina D Song; Joseph P Newhouse; Xabier Garcia-De-Albeniz; John Hsu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Mailed FIT (fecal immunochemical test), navigation or patient reminders? Using microsimulation to inform selection of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening in Medicaid enrollees.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Siddhartha Nambiar; Maria E Mayorga; Eliana Sullivan; Karen Hicklin; Meghan C O'Leary; Kristen Dillon; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Yifan Gu; Bonnie K Lind; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 4.  Causes of Socioeconomic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer and Intervention Framework and Strategies.

Authors:  John M Carethers; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  The potential impact of the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid expansion on reducing colorectal cancer screening disparities in African American males.

Authors:  Wizdom Powell; Leah Frerichs; Rachel Townsley; Maria Mayorga; Jennifer Richmond; Giselle Corbie-Smith; Stephanie Wheeler; Kristen Hassmiller Lich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Life-years gained resulting from screening colonoscopy compared with follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based colorectal screening test.

Authors:  A Mark Fendrick; Bijan J Borah; A Burak Ozbay; Leila Saoud; Paul J Limburg
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-01-19

7.  Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of Innovative Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests.

Authors:  Elisabeth F P Peterse; Reinier G S Meester; Lucie de Jonge; Amir-Houshang Omidvari; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Amy B Knudsen; Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 11.816

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.