Literature DB >> 26058463

Hepato-pancreatectomy: how morbid? Results from the national surgical quality improvement project.

Thuy B Tran1, Monica M Dua1, David A Spain1, Brendan C Visser1, Jeffrey A Norton1, George A Poultsides1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous resection of both the liver and the pancreas carries significant complexity. The objective of this study was to investigate peri-operative outcomes after a synchronous hepatectomy and pancreatectomy (SHP).
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried to identify patients who underwent SHP. Resections were categorized as '< hemihepatectomy', '≥ hemihepatectomy' (hemihepatectomy and trisectionectomy), 'PD' (pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy) and 'distal' (distal pancreatectomy and enucleation).
RESULTS: From 2005 to 2013, 480 patients underwent SHP. Patients were stratified based on the extent of resection: '< hemihepatectomy + distal (n = 224)', '≥ hemihepatectomy + distal' (n = 49), '< hemihepatectomy + PD' (n = 83) and '≥ hemihepatectomy + PD' (n = 24). Although the first three groups had a reasonable and comparable safety profile (morbidity 33-51% and mortality 0-6.6%), the '≥ hemihepatectomy + PD' group was associated with an 87.5% morbidity (organ space infection 58.3%, re-intubation 12.5%, reoperation 25% and septic shock 25%), 8.3% 30-day mortality and 18.2% in-hospital mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: A synchronous hemihepatectomy (or trisectionectomy) with PD remains a highly morbid combination and should be reserved for patients who have undergone extremely cautious selection.
© 2015 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26058463      PMCID: PMC4557649          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  41 in total

Review 1.  A review of techniques for liver resection.

Authors:  A G Heriot; N D Karanjia
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  RADICAL PANCREATODUODENECTOMY: A 22-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH THE COMPLICATIONS, MORTALITY RATE, AND SURVIVAL RATE.

Authors:  J J MONGE; E S JUDD; R P GAGE
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Reappraisal of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy as a treatment modality for bile duct and gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Chang-Sup Lim; Jin-Young Jang; Seung Eun Lee; Mee Joo Kang; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: radiographic calcifications correlate with grade and metastasis.

Authors:  George A Poultsides; Lyen C Huang; Yijun Chen; Brendan C Visser; Reetesh K Pai; R Brooke Jeffrey; Walter G Park; Ann M Chen; Pamela L Kunz; George A Fisher; Jeffrey A Norton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Is extended hemihepatectomy plus pancreaticoduodenectomy justified for advanced bile duct cancer and gallbladder cancer?

Authors:  Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Satoshi Nara; Yoji Kishi; Minoru Esaki; Kazuaki Shimada; Norihiro Kokudo; Tomoo Kosuge
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Is major hepatectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy justified for advanced biliary malignancy?

Authors:  Shiro Miwa; Akira Kobayashi; Yasuhiko Akahane; Takenari Nakata; Motohiro Mihara; Kei Kusama; Shinichiro Ogawa; Junpei Soeda; Shinichi Miyagawa
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2007-03-27

7.  Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center review of 85 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Tomoki Ebata; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tsuyoshi Igami; Gen Sugawara; Yu Takahashi; Yuji Nimura; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 20-year experience in 516 patients.

Authors:  C Max Schmidt; Emilie S Powell; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Thomas J Howard; Eric A Wiebke; Chad A Wiesenauer; Joel A Baumgardner; Oscar W Cummings; Lewis E Jacobson; Thomas A Broadie; David F Canal; Robert J Goulet; Eardie A Curie; Higinia Cardenes; John M Watkins; Patrick J Loehrer; Keith D Lillemoe; James A Madura
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-07

9.  Combined pancreaticoduodenectomy and hepatectomy for patients with locally advanced gallbladder carcinoma: long term results.

Authors:  Y Shirai; T Ohtani; K Tsukada; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Anesthetic considerations during liver surgery.

Authors:  Imre Redai; Jean Emond; Tricia Brentjens
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.741

View more
  4 in total

1.  Hybrid Laparoscopic and Robotic Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Eui Hyuk Chong; Sung Hoon Choi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Central hepatopancreatoduodenectomy-oncological effectiveness and parenchymal sparing option for diffusely spreading bile duct cancer: report of two cases.

Authors:  Kapil Nagaraj; Yuichi Goto; Satoki Kojima; Hisamune Sakai; Toru Hisaka; Yoshito Akagi; Koji Okuda
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Safety and Outcomes of Combined Pancreatic and Hepatic Resections for Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Hallbera Gudmundsdottir; Ron Pery; Rondell P Graham; Cornelius A Thiels; Susanne G Warner; Rory L Smoot; Mark J Truty; Michael L Kendrick; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Elizabeth B Habermann; David M Nagorney; Sean P Cleary
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Simultaneous Resection for Synchronous Double Primary Cancers of the Pancreas and the Liver.

Authors:  Tomohiko Taniai; Koichiro Haruki; Hiroaki Shiba; Shinji Onda; Taro Sakamoto; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.