Literature DB >> 22750757

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center review of 85 consecutive patients.

Tomoki Ebata1, Yukihiro Yokoyama, Tsuyoshi Igami, Gen Sugawara, Yu Takahashi, Yuji Nimura, Masato Nagino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To outline our experience with hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) as a treatment for cholangiocarcinoma and to appraise the clinical significance of this challenging procedure.
BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinomas often exhibit an extensive ductal spread invading from the hepatic hilus to the lower bile duct, and such tumors can be completely resected only by HPD. Early experiences with HPD were associated with high mortality and morbidity, leading to an underestimation of the survival benefit of HPD.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 85 patients with cholangiocarcinoma who underwent HPD from 1992 to 2011. Major hepatectomy was performed in 79 patients (92.9%), and combined vascular resection was performed in 26 patients (30.6%).
RESULTS: The operating time was 762 ± 141 minutes, and blood loss was 2696 ± 1970 mL. Liver failure was the most common abdominal complication (n = 64), followed by pancreatic fistula (n = 60), wound sepsis (n = 33), intra-abdominal abscess (n = 22), refractory ascites (n = 17), bacteremia (n = 16), bile leakage (n = 13), and delayed gastric emptying (n = 12). Re-laparotomy was necessary in 9 cases (11.1%). Overall, 19 patients (22.4%) exhibited Clavien grade 0 to II complications, 58 (68.2%) exhibited grade III, 6 (7.1%) exhibited grade IV, and 2 (2.4%) exhibited grade V (mortality). The overall survival rate for the 85 patients was 79.7% after 1 year, 48.5% after 3 years, 37.4% after 5 years, and 32.1% after 10 years; 9 (10.5%) patients survived for more than 5 years. The rate of survival for the 53 patients with pM0 disease who underwent R0 resection was the most favorable, with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 54.3% and 46.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: HPD is technically demanding and is associated with high morbidity. However, this surgery can be performed with low mortality and offers a better probability of long-term survival in selected patients. As hepatobiliary surgeons, we should consider HPD to be a standard procedure for laterally advanced cholangiocarcinomas that are otherwise unresectable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22750757     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826029ca

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  50 in total

1.  Isolated caudate lobectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy for a bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Sano; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Yoshiki Senda; Koji Komori; Seiji Ito; Tetsuya Abe; Taira Kinoshita; Yuji Nimura
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Improved surgical outcomes for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: changes in surgical procedures and related outcomes based on 40 years of experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Ryota Higuchi; Takehiro Ota; Takehisa Yazawa; Hideki Kajiyama; Tatsuo Araida; Toru Furukawa; Tatsuya Yoshikawa; Ken Takasaki; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Extra-Hepatic Bile Duct Resection: an Insight in the Management of Gallbladder Cancer.

Authors:  Durgatosh Pandey; Pankaj Kumar Garg; N M L Manjunath; Jyoti Sharma
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2015-09

4.  The value of preoperative screening colonoscopies in patients with biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Keita Itatsu; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tomoki Ebata; Tsuyoshi Igami; Gen Sugawara; Keisuke Uehara; Takashi Mizuno; Masahiko Ando; Hidemi Goto; Masato Nagino
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Evaluation of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients undergoing hepatobiliary resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Masataka Okuno; Tomoki Ebata; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tsuyoshi Igami; Gen Sugawara; Takashi Mizuno; Junpei Yamaguchi; Masato Nagino
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 6.  Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a surgeon's viewpoint on current topics.

Authors:  Masato Nagino
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Cutting edge of an aggressive surgical approach for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Masato Nagino
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-06

Review 8.  Assessing resectability in cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Sano; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Yoshiki Senda; Taira Kinoshita; Yuji Nimura
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2013-12-20

Review 9.  Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Current therapy.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Lu-Nan Yan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-08-15

10.  Resection of a cholangiocarcinoma via laparoscopic hepatopancreato- duodenectomy: a case report.

Authors:  Miao-Zun Zhang; Xiao-Wu Xu; Yi-Ping Mou; Jia-Fei Yan; Yi-Ping Zhu; Ren-Chao Zhang; Yu-Cheng Zhou; Ke Chen; Wei-Wei Jin; Erik Matro; Harsha Ajoodhea
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.