Kenneth D Ward1, Kamran Siddiqi2, Jasjit S Ahluwalia3, Adam C Alexander4, Taghrid Asfar5. 1. School of Public Health, University of Memphis, 201 Robison Hall, Memphis, TN 38152-3450, United States; Syrian Center for Tobacco Studies, Tishreen Street, Sheehan, PO Box: 16542, Aleppo, Syria. Electronic address: kdward@memphis.edu. 2. Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington York YO10 5DD, England, United Kingdom. 3. Rutgers School of Public Health, The State University of New Jersey, 683 Hoes Lane West, Room 235, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States. 4. School of Public Health, University of Memphis, 201 Robison Hall, Memphis, TN 38152-3450, United States. 5. Syrian Center for Tobacco Studies, Tishreen Street, Sheehan, PO Box: 16542, Aleppo, Syria; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th St, Suite 912, Miami, FL 33136, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Waterpipe use has spread globally, and has substantial negative health effects and nicotine dependence potential. A growing literature addresses cessation-related experiences of waterpipe users, but this literature has not been summarized nor is guidance available on developing and testing cessation interventions. METHOD: Authors gathered key empirical papers on waterpipe cessation-related topics, including observational studies about users' perceived ability to quit, interest in quitting, quit rates, and cessation trials. Based on this review, recommendations are made to guide the development and rigorous evaluation of waterpipe cessation interventions. RESULTS: Many users want to quit and make quit attempts, but are unsuccessful at doing so on their own; therefore, developing and testing waterpipe cessation interventions should be a priority for global tobacco control efforts. Early efforts have tested waterpipe cessation interventions designed for, or adapted from, cigarette smoking programs. CONCLUSIONS: Waterpipe-specific cessation programs that address unique features of waterpipe smoking (e.g., its cultural significance, social uses, and intermittent use pattern) and characteristics and motivations of users who want to quit are needed. Recommendations are provided to move waterpipe cessation intervention development forward.
BACKGROUND: Waterpipe use has spread globally, and has substantial negative health effects and nicotine dependence potential. A growing literature addresses cessation-related experiences of waterpipe users, but this literature has not been summarized nor is guidance available on developing and testing cessation interventions. METHOD: Authors gathered key empirical papers on waterpipe cessation-related topics, including observational studies about users' perceived ability to quit, interest in quitting, quit rates, and cessation trials. Based on this review, recommendations are made to guide the development and rigorous evaluation of waterpipe cessation interventions. RESULTS: Many users want to quit and make quit attempts, but are unsuccessful at doing so on their own; therefore, developing and testing waterpipe cessation interventions should be a priority for global tobacco control efforts. Early efforts have tested waterpipe cessation interventions designed for, or adapted from, cigarette smoking programs. CONCLUSIONS: Waterpipe-specific cessation programs that address unique features of waterpipe smoking (e.g., its cultural significance, social uses, and intermittent use pattern) and characteristics and motivations of users who want to quit are needed. Recommendations are provided to move waterpipe cessation intervention development forward.
Authors: Eleanor L S Leavens; Ellen Meier; Alayna P Tackett; Mary Beth Miller; Noor N Tahirkheli; Emma I Brett; Dana M Carroll; Leslie M Driskill; Michael P Anderson; Theodore L Wagener Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-10-28 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan; Raed Bahelah; Zoran Bursac; Ziyad Ben Taleb; Joseph R DiFranza; Malak Tleis; Rima Nakkash; Rime Jebai; Mohammad Masudul Alam; Miguel Ángel Cano; Matthew T Sutherland; Kristopher Fenni; Taghrid Asfar; Thomas Eissenberg; Kenneth D Ward; Wasim Maziak Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Aruni Bhatnagar; Wasim Maziak; Thomas Eissenberg; Kenneth D Ward; George Thurston; Brian A King; Erin L Sutfin; Caroline O Cobb; Merlyn Griffiths; Larry B Goldstein; Mary Rezk-Hanna Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Omar F Khabour; Karem H Alzoubi; Nihaya A Al-Sheyab; Mohammad A Azab; Adnan M Massadeh; Ahmed A Alomary; Thomas E Eissenberg Journal: Inhal Toxicol Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 2.724
Authors: Muhamad Ali K Shakhatreh; Omar F Khabour; Karem H Alzoubi; Majed M Masadeh; Emad I Hussein; George N Bshara Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2018-02-02