| Literature DB >> 26052333 |
Lingan Kong1, Mingze Sun2, Yan Xie1, Fahong Wang1, Zhendong Zhao1.
Abstract
The non-leaf photosynthetic organs have recently attracted much attention for the breeding and screening of varieties of cereal crops to achieve a high grain yield. However, the glume photosynthetic characteristics and responses to high temperature at the late stages of grain filling are not well known in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). In the present study, an experiment was conducted to investigate the anatomy, chloroplast temporal changes, chlorophyll fluorescence, xanthophyll cycle and antioxidative defense system in glumes of field-grown wheat during grain filling compared with flag leaves. Observations using a light microscope revealed that the glumes developed a solid structural base for performing photosynthesis. Compared with the flag leaves, the glumes preserved a more integral ultrastructure, as observed under transmission electron microscopy, and had higher values of Fv/Fm and ΦPSII at the maturity stage. Further analysis of the chlorophyll fluorescence demonstrated that the glumes experienced high non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) at the late stages. Determination of the pool size of the xanthophyll cycle suggested that the (A+Z)/(V+A+Z) ratio was consistently higher in glumes than in flag leaves and that the V+A+Z content was considerably higher in glumes at the maturity stage. In addition, the glumes exhibited a higher antioxidant enzyme activity and a lower accumulation of reactive oxygen species. These results suggest that the glumes are photosynthetically active and senesce later than the flag leaves; the advantages may have been achieved by coordinated contributions of the structural features, higher NPQ levels, greater de-epoxidation of the xanthophyll cycle components and antioxidative defense metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidative defense; chlorophyll fluorescence; non-photochemical quenching; ultrastructure; wheat; xanthophyll cycle
Year: 2015 PMID: 26052333 PMCID: PMC4440901 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Representative profile of the air temperature (A) and photosynthetically active photon flux density (PPFD) (B) of wheat during grain filling in the 2012–2013 cropping year at the experimental site. Each datum was collected every 10 min using a mini-type weather station.
FIGURE 2Glume (A–C) and flag leaf (D) cross-sections were stained with toluidine blue O to show the anatomy at the anthesis of wheat cv. Jimai 22. Note the chlorenchyma strands and the localization of mesophyll cells in the center of glumes. Abbreviations: ab, abaxial side; ad, adaxial side; bs, bundle sheath; cs, chlorenchyma strands; d, dorsal; e, epidermis; me, mesophyll cell; sc, sclerenchyma cell; and v, ventral (bar = 100 μm).
Stomatal density of the flag leaf and glume in wheat.
| Flag leaf | Adaxial | 57.83 ± 6.56 b |
| Abaxial | 44.75 ± 6.37 c | |
| Glume | Dorsal | 63.23 ± 4.89 b |
| Ventral | 80.56 ± 9.16 a |
Each value represents the mean ± SD of five ears and at least four glumes were measured in each ear. Means followed by different letters differed significantly at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
FIGURE 3Transmission electron micrographs showing the ultrastructure of cells in wheat flag leaves (A, E, I, M, and Q) and glumes (B–D, F–H, J–L, N, O, P, R, S, and T) at 0, 8, 16, 24, and 32 DAA of wheat. (A–D and H): 0 DAA; (E–G): 8 DAA; (I–L): 16 DAA, (M–P and T): 24 DAA; (M–P and T): 24 DAA. (Q–S): 32 DAA. (C, G, H, K, O, S), and (T): higher magnification of the areas highlighted in (B, F, D, J, N, R), and (T), respectively. Abbreviations: Ch, chloroplast; G, granum; PF, pit field; Pl, plasmodesma; P, plastoglobule; S, starch grain. Scale bars: 500 nM (A, E, I, M, P and Q), 2 μM (B, D, F, J, L, N and R), and 50 nM (C, G, K, O, S and Q).
FIGURE 4Fluorescence imaging of the maximal efficiency of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm, A, D), actual PSII efficiency (Φ The measurements were performed at 0, 8, 16, 24, and 32 DAA. The data were determined in the year 2013. Each value is the mean ± SD from at least six leaves or 30 glumes. The columns labeled with different letters differed significantly at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test using DPS software.
Statistical analysis of effects of the organ (glume and flag leaf) and the date of sampling on chlorophyll fluorescence, antioxidative enzymes, ROS concentration, and xanthophyll cycle.
| Fv/Fm | 29.37, < 0.01 | 244.33, < 0.01 | 8.65, < 0.01 |
| ΦPSII | 4.11, 0.05 | 44.55, < 0.01 | 3.53, 0.01 |
| NPQ | 82.81, < 0.01 | 173.09, < 0.01 | 31.04, < 0.01 |
| V+A+Z | 233.11, < 0.01 | 35.57, < 0.01 | 43.92, < 0.01 |
| (A+Z)/(V+A+Z) | 35.03, < 0.01 | 133.88, < 0.01 | 0.78, 0.55 |
| SOD | 128.34, < 0.01 | 65.14, < 0.01 | 47.08, < 0.01 |
| POD | 811058, < 0.01 | 144.63, < 0.01 | 102.11, < 0.01 |
| CAT | 5.10, 0.03 | 415.45, < 0.01 | 59.43, < 0.01 |
| ROS concentration | 16.13, < 0.01 | 45.22, < 0.01 | 2.26, 0.08 |
FIGURE 5Changes in the xanthophyll cycle pool size, i.e., contents of V+A+Z (A), and the de-epoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle, i.e., the (A+Z)/(V+A+Z) ratio (B). Columns with different letters are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test using DPS software (P < 0.05). The P value for comparison between flag leaf and glume at each stage is presented over the top of column. The values are the means ± SD from three independent measurements.
FIGURE 6Comparison of the activities of POD (A), CAT (B) and SOD (C) and of the relative DCFH-DA fluorescence intensity between the glumes and flag leaves (D). The ROS concentration was measured using DCFH-DA, which is oxidized by ROS to DCF. The fluorescence was determined at 20 min after the incubation of glumes or flag leaf cross-sections with DCFH-DA. Each value represents the mean ± SD from four independent samples. The columns labeled with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test using DPS software. The P value for comparison between flag leaf and glume at each stage is presented over the top of column.